Cargando…

Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munce, Sarah EP, Steele Gray, Carolyn, Pomeroy, Beverley Claire, Bayley, Mark, Kokorelias, Kristina Marie, Luong, Dorothy, Biddiss, Elaine, Cave, Trish, Bragge, Peter, Chew-Graham, Carolyn A, Colquhoun, Heather, Dadich, Ann, Dainty, Katie N, Elliott, Mark, Feng, Patrick, Goldhar, Jodeme, Hamilton, Clayon B, Harvey, Gillian, Kastner, Monika, Kothari, Anita, Langley, Joe, Jeffs, Lianne, Masterson, Daniel, Nelson, Michelle LA, Perrier, Laure, Riley, John, Sellen, Kate, Seto, Emily, Simpson, Robert, Staniszewska, Sophie, Srinivasan, Vasanthi, Straus, Sharon E, Tricco, Andrea C, Kuluski, Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37902812
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50463
_version_ 1785134501494521856
author Munce, Sarah EP
Steele Gray, Carolyn
Pomeroy, Beverley Claire
Bayley, Mark
Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
Luong, Dorothy
Biddiss, Elaine
Cave, Trish
Bragge, Peter
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A
Colquhoun, Heather
Dadich, Ann
Dainty, Katie N
Elliott, Mark
Feng, Patrick
Goldhar, Jodeme
Hamilton, Clayon B
Harvey, Gillian
Kastner, Monika
Kothari, Anita
Langley, Joe
Jeffs, Lianne
Masterson, Daniel
Nelson, Michelle LA
Perrier, Laure
Riley, John
Sellen, Kate
Seto, Emily
Simpson, Robert
Staniszewska, Sophie
Srinivasan, Vasanthi
Straus, Sharon E
Tricco, Andrea C
Kuluski, Kerry
author_facet Munce, Sarah EP
Steele Gray, Carolyn
Pomeroy, Beverley Claire
Bayley, Mark
Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
Luong, Dorothy
Biddiss, Elaine
Cave, Trish
Bragge, Peter
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A
Colquhoun, Heather
Dadich, Ann
Dainty, Katie N
Elliott, Mark
Feng, Patrick
Goldhar, Jodeme
Hamilton, Clayon B
Harvey, Gillian
Kastner, Monika
Kothari, Anita
Langley, Joe
Jeffs, Lianne
Masterson, Daniel
Nelson, Michelle LA
Perrier, Laure
Riley, John
Sellen, Kate
Seto, Emily
Simpson, Robert
Staniszewska, Sophie
Srinivasan, Vasanthi
Straus, Sharon E
Tricco, Andrea C
Kuluski, Kerry
author_sort Munce, Sarah EP
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of the Preferred Components for Co-design in Research (PRECISE) guideline to enhance the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting co-design studies used to develop complex health interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to develop the first iteration of the PRECISE guideline. The purpose of the PRECISE guideline is to improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting on studies that use co-design to develop complex health interventions. METHODS: The aim will be achieved by addressing the following objectives: to review and synthesize the literature on the models, theories, and frameworks used in the co-design of complex health interventions to identify their common elements (components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes); and by using the results of the scoping review, prioritize the co-design components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes to be included in the PRECISE guideline. RESULTS: The project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CONCLUSIONS: The collective results of this project will lead to a ready-to-implement PRECISE guideline that outlines a minimum set of items to include when reporting the co-design of complex health interventions. The PRECISE guideline will improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reports of studies. Additionally, it will include guidance on how to enact or enable the values or principles of co-design for meaningful and collaborative solutions (interventions). PRECISE might also be used by peer reviewers and editors to improve the review of manuscripts involving co-design. Ultimately, the PRECISE guideline will facilitate more efficient use of new results about complex health intervention development and bring better returns on research investments. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/50463
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106441952023-10-30 Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process Munce, Sarah EP Steele Gray, Carolyn Pomeroy, Beverley Claire Bayley, Mark Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Luong, Dorothy Biddiss, Elaine Cave, Trish Bragge, Peter Chew-Graham, Carolyn A Colquhoun, Heather Dadich, Ann Dainty, Katie N Elliott, Mark Feng, Patrick Goldhar, Jodeme Hamilton, Clayon B Harvey, Gillian Kastner, Monika Kothari, Anita Langley, Joe Jeffs, Lianne Masterson, Daniel Nelson, Michelle LA Perrier, Laure Riley, John Sellen, Kate Seto, Emily Simpson, Robert Staniszewska, Sophie Srinivasan, Vasanthi Straus, Sharon E Tricco, Andrea C Kuluski, Kerry JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of the Preferred Components for Co-design in Research (PRECISE) guideline to enhance the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting co-design studies used to develop complex health interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to develop the first iteration of the PRECISE guideline. The purpose of the PRECISE guideline is to improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting on studies that use co-design to develop complex health interventions. METHODS: The aim will be achieved by addressing the following objectives: to review and synthesize the literature on the models, theories, and frameworks used in the co-design of complex health interventions to identify their common elements (components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes); and by using the results of the scoping review, prioritize the co-design components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes to be included in the PRECISE guideline. RESULTS: The project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CONCLUSIONS: The collective results of this project will lead to a ready-to-implement PRECISE guideline that outlines a minimum set of items to include when reporting the co-design of complex health interventions. The PRECISE guideline will improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reports of studies. Additionally, it will include guidance on how to enact or enable the values or principles of co-design for meaningful and collaborative solutions (interventions). PRECISE might also be used by peer reviewers and editors to improve the review of manuscripts involving co-design. Ultimately, the PRECISE guideline will facilitate more efficient use of new results about complex health intervention development and bring better returns on research investments. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/50463 JMIR Publications 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10644195/ /pubmed/37902812 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50463 Text en ©Sarah EP Munce, Carolyn Steele Gray, Beverley Claire Pomeroy, Mark Bayley, Kristina Marie Kokorelias, Dorothy Luong, Elaine Biddiss, Trish Cave, Peter Bragge, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Heather Colquhoun, Ann Dadich, Katie N Dainty, Mark Elliott, Patrick Feng, Jodeme Goldhar, Clayon B Hamilton, Gillian Harvey, Monika Kastner, Anita Kothari, Joe Langley, Lianne Jeffs, Daniel Masterson, Michelle LA Nelson, Laure Perrier, John Riley, Kate Sellen, Emily Seto, Robert Simpson, Sophie Staniszewska, Vasanthi Srinivasan, Sharon E Straus, Andrea C Tricco, Kerry Kuluski. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 30.10.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Munce, Sarah EP
Steele Gray, Carolyn
Pomeroy, Beverley Claire
Bayley, Mark
Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
Luong, Dorothy
Biddiss, Elaine
Cave, Trish
Bragge, Peter
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A
Colquhoun, Heather
Dadich, Ann
Dainty, Katie N
Elliott, Mark
Feng, Patrick
Goldhar, Jodeme
Hamilton, Clayon B
Harvey, Gillian
Kastner, Monika
Kothari, Anita
Langley, Joe
Jeffs, Lianne
Masterson, Daniel
Nelson, Michelle LA
Perrier, Laure
Riley, John
Sellen, Kate
Seto, Emily
Simpson, Robert
Staniszewska, Sophie
Srinivasan, Vasanthi
Straus, Sharon E
Tricco, Andrea C
Kuluski, Kerry
Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
title Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
title_full Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
title_fullStr Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
title_full_unstemmed Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
title_short Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
title_sort development of the preferred components for co-design in research guideline and checklist: protocol for a scoping review and a modified delphi process
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37902812
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50463
work_keys_str_mv AT muncesarahep developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT steelegraycarolyn developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT pomeroybeverleyclaire developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT bayleymark developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT kokoreliaskristinamarie developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT luongdorothy developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT biddisselaine developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT cavetrish developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT braggepeter developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT chewgrahamcarolyna developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT colquhounheather developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT dadichann developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT daintykatien developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT elliottmark developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT fengpatrick developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT goldharjodeme developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT hamiltonclayonb developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT harveygillian developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT kastnermonika developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT kotharianita developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT langleyjoe developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT jeffslianne developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT mastersondaniel developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT nelsonmichellela developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT perrierlaure developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT rileyjohn developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT sellenkate developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT setoemily developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT simpsonrobert developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT staniszewskasophie developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT srinivasanvasanthi developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT straussharone developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT triccoandreac developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess
AT kuluskikerry developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess