Cargando…
Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37902812 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50463 |
_version_ | 1785134501494521856 |
---|---|
author | Munce, Sarah EP Steele Gray, Carolyn Pomeroy, Beverley Claire Bayley, Mark Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Luong, Dorothy Biddiss, Elaine Cave, Trish Bragge, Peter Chew-Graham, Carolyn A Colquhoun, Heather Dadich, Ann Dainty, Katie N Elliott, Mark Feng, Patrick Goldhar, Jodeme Hamilton, Clayon B Harvey, Gillian Kastner, Monika Kothari, Anita Langley, Joe Jeffs, Lianne Masterson, Daniel Nelson, Michelle LA Perrier, Laure Riley, John Sellen, Kate Seto, Emily Simpson, Robert Staniszewska, Sophie Srinivasan, Vasanthi Straus, Sharon E Tricco, Andrea C Kuluski, Kerry |
author_facet | Munce, Sarah EP Steele Gray, Carolyn Pomeroy, Beverley Claire Bayley, Mark Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Luong, Dorothy Biddiss, Elaine Cave, Trish Bragge, Peter Chew-Graham, Carolyn A Colquhoun, Heather Dadich, Ann Dainty, Katie N Elliott, Mark Feng, Patrick Goldhar, Jodeme Hamilton, Clayon B Harvey, Gillian Kastner, Monika Kothari, Anita Langley, Joe Jeffs, Lianne Masterson, Daniel Nelson, Michelle LA Perrier, Laure Riley, John Sellen, Kate Seto, Emily Simpson, Robert Staniszewska, Sophie Srinivasan, Vasanthi Straus, Sharon E Tricco, Andrea C Kuluski, Kerry |
author_sort | Munce, Sarah EP |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of the Preferred Components for Co-design in Research (PRECISE) guideline to enhance the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting co-design studies used to develop complex health interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to develop the first iteration of the PRECISE guideline. The purpose of the PRECISE guideline is to improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting on studies that use co-design to develop complex health interventions. METHODS: The aim will be achieved by addressing the following objectives: to review and synthesize the literature on the models, theories, and frameworks used in the co-design of complex health interventions to identify their common elements (components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes); and by using the results of the scoping review, prioritize the co-design components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes to be included in the PRECISE guideline. RESULTS: The project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CONCLUSIONS: The collective results of this project will lead to a ready-to-implement PRECISE guideline that outlines a minimum set of items to include when reporting the co-design of complex health interventions. The PRECISE guideline will improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reports of studies. Additionally, it will include guidance on how to enact or enable the values or principles of co-design for meaningful and collaborative solutions (interventions). PRECISE might also be used by peer reviewers and editors to improve the review of manuscripts involving co-design. Ultimately, the PRECISE guideline will facilitate more efficient use of new results about complex health intervention development and bring better returns on research investments. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/50463 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106441952023-10-30 Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process Munce, Sarah EP Steele Gray, Carolyn Pomeroy, Beverley Claire Bayley, Mark Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Luong, Dorothy Biddiss, Elaine Cave, Trish Bragge, Peter Chew-Graham, Carolyn A Colquhoun, Heather Dadich, Ann Dainty, Katie N Elliott, Mark Feng, Patrick Goldhar, Jodeme Hamilton, Clayon B Harvey, Gillian Kastner, Monika Kothari, Anita Langley, Joe Jeffs, Lianne Masterson, Daniel Nelson, Michelle LA Perrier, Laure Riley, John Sellen, Kate Seto, Emily Simpson, Robert Staniszewska, Sophie Srinivasan, Vasanthi Straus, Sharon E Tricco, Andrea C Kuluski, Kerry JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of the Preferred Components for Co-design in Research (PRECISE) guideline to enhance the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting co-design studies used to develop complex health interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to develop the first iteration of the PRECISE guideline. The purpose of the PRECISE guideline is to improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting on studies that use co-design to develop complex health interventions. METHODS: The aim will be achieved by addressing the following objectives: to review and synthesize the literature on the models, theories, and frameworks used in the co-design of complex health interventions to identify their common elements (components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes); and by using the results of the scoping review, prioritize the co-design components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes to be included in the PRECISE guideline. RESULTS: The project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CONCLUSIONS: The collective results of this project will lead to a ready-to-implement PRECISE guideline that outlines a minimum set of items to include when reporting the co-design of complex health interventions. The PRECISE guideline will improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reports of studies. Additionally, it will include guidance on how to enact or enable the values or principles of co-design for meaningful and collaborative solutions (interventions). PRECISE might also be used by peer reviewers and editors to improve the review of manuscripts involving co-design. Ultimately, the PRECISE guideline will facilitate more efficient use of new results about complex health intervention development and bring better returns on research investments. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/50463 JMIR Publications 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10644195/ /pubmed/37902812 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50463 Text en ©Sarah EP Munce, Carolyn Steele Gray, Beverley Claire Pomeroy, Mark Bayley, Kristina Marie Kokorelias, Dorothy Luong, Elaine Biddiss, Trish Cave, Peter Bragge, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Heather Colquhoun, Ann Dadich, Katie N Dainty, Mark Elliott, Patrick Feng, Jodeme Goldhar, Clayon B Hamilton, Gillian Harvey, Monika Kastner, Anita Kothari, Joe Langley, Lianne Jeffs, Daniel Masterson, Michelle LA Nelson, Laure Perrier, John Riley, Kate Sellen, Emily Seto, Robert Simpson, Sophie Staniszewska, Vasanthi Srinivasan, Sharon E Straus, Andrea C Tricco, Kerry Kuluski. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 30.10.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Munce, Sarah EP Steele Gray, Carolyn Pomeroy, Beverley Claire Bayley, Mark Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Luong, Dorothy Biddiss, Elaine Cave, Trish Bragge, Peter Chew-Graham, Carolyn A Colquhoun, Heather Dadich, Ann Dainty, Katie N Elliott, Mark Feng, Patrick Goldhar, Jodeme Hamilton, Clayon B Harvey, Gillian Kastner, Monika Kothari, Anita Langley, Joe Jeffs, Lianne Masterson, Daniel Nelson, Michelle LA Perrier, Laure Riley, John Sellen, Kate Seto, Emily Simpson, Robert Staniszewska, Sophie Srinivasan, Vasanthi Straus, Sharon E Tricco, Andrea C Kuluski, Kerry Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process |
title | Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process |
title_full | Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process |
title_fullStr | Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process |
title_short | Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process |
title_sort | development of the preferred components for co-design in research guideline and checklist: protocol for a scoping review and a modified delphi process |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37902812 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muncesarahep developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT steelegraycarolyn developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT pomeroybeverleyclaire developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT bayleymark developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT kokoreliaskristinamarie developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT luongdorothy developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT biddisselaine developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT cavetrish developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT braggepeter developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT chewgrahamcarolyna developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT colquhounheather developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT dadichann developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT daintykatien developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT elliottmark developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT fengpatrick developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT goldharjodeme developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT hamiltonclayonb developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT harveygillian developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT kastnermonika developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT kotharianita developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT langleyjoe developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT jeffslianne developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT mastersondaniel developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT nelsonmichellela developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT perrierlaure developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT rileyjohn developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT sellenkate developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT setoemily developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT simpsonrobert developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT staniszewskasophie developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT srinivasanvasanthi developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT straussharone developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT triccoandreac developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess AT kuluskikerry developmentofthepreferredcomponentsforcodesigninresearchguidelineandchecklistprotocolforascopingreviewandamodifieddelphiprocess |