Cargando…
Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study
INTRODUCTION: Observational studies have yielded inconsistent findings regarding the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and various spinal disorders. To explore the relationship between total-body BMD and various spinal disorders further, we conducted a Mendelian randomization analysis t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1285137 |
_version_ | 1785134518090334208 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Qingyu Gao, Haihao Shi, Xudong Wu, Yan Ni, Wentao Shang, Aijia |
author_facet | Jiang, Qingyu Gao, Haihao Shi, Xudong Wu, Yan Ni, Wentao Shang, Aijia |
author_sort | Jiang, Qingyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Observational studies have yielded inconsistent findings regarding the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and various spinal disorders. To explore the relationship between total-body BMD and various spinal disorders further, we conducted a Mendelian randomization analysis to assess this association. METHODS: Two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to investigate the association between total-body BMD and various spinal disorders. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary effect estimate, and additional methods, including weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode, were used to assess the reliability of the results. To examine the robustness of the data further, we conducted a sensitivity analysis using alternative bone-density databases, validating the outcome data. RESULTS: MR revealed a significant positive association between total-body BMD and the prevalence of spondylosis and spinal stenosis. When total-body BMD was considered as the exposure factor, the analysis demonstrated an increased risk of spinal stenosis (IVW odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–1.32; P < 0.001) and spondylosis (IVW: OR 1.24; 95%CI, 1.16–1.33; P < 0.001). Similarly, when focusing solely on heel BMD as the exposure factor, we found a positive correlation with the development of both spinal stenosis (IVW OR 1.13, 95%CI, 1.05–1.21; P < 0.001) and spondylosis (IVW OR 1.10, 95%CI, 1.03–1.18; P = 0.0048). However, no significant associations were found between total-body BMD and other spinal disorders, including spinal instability, spondylolisthesis/spondylolysis, and scoliosis (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study verified an association of total-body BMD with spinal stenosis and with spondylosis. Our results imply that when an increasing trend in BMD is detected during patient examinations and if the patient complains of numbness and pain, the potential occurrence of conditions such as spondylosis or spinal stenosis should be investigated and treated appropriately. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106442982023-01-01 Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study Jiang, Qingyu Gao, Haihao Shi, Xudong Wu, Yan Ni, Wentao Shang, Aijia Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Observational studies have yielded inconsistent findings regarding the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and various spinal disorders. To explore the relationship between total-body BMD and various spinal disorders further, we conducted a Mendelian randomization analysis to assess this association. METHODS: Two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to investigate the association between total-body BMD and various spinal disorders. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary effect estimate, and additional methods, including weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode, were used to assess the reliability of the results. To examine the robustness of the data further, we conducted a sensitivity analysis using alternative bone-density databases, validating the outcome data. RESULTS: MR revealed a significant positive association between total-body BMD and the prevalence of spondylosis and spinal stenosis. When total-body BMD was considered as the exposure factor, the analysis demonstrated an increased risk of spinal stenosis (IVW odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–1.32; P < 0.001) and spondylosis (IVW: OR 1.24; 95%CI, 1.16–1.33; P < 0.001). Similarly, when focusing solely on heel BMD as the exposure factor, we found a positive correlation with the development of both spinal stenosis (IVW OR 1.13, 95%CI, 1.05–1.21; P < 0.001) and spondylosis (IVW OR 1.10, 95%CI, 1.03–1.18; P = 0.0048). However, no significant associations were found between total-body BMD and other spinal disorders, including spinal instability, spondylolisthesis/spondylolysis, and scoliosis (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study verified an association of total-body BMD with spinal stenosis and with spondylosis. Our results imply that when an increasing trend in BMD is detected during patient examinations and if the patient complains of numbness and pain, the potential occurrence of conditions such as spondylosis or spinal stenosis should be investigated and treated appropriately. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10644298/ /pubmed/38027141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1285137 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jiang, Gao, Shi, Wu, Ni and Shang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Jiang, Qingyu Gao, Haihao Shi, Xudong Wu, Yan Ni, Wentao Shang, Aijia Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study |
title | Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study |
title_full | Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study |
title_fullStr | Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study |
title_full_unstemmed | Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study |
title_short | Total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a Mendelian randomization study |
title_sort | total body bone mineral density and various spinal disorders: a mendelian randomization study |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1285137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangqingyu totalbodybonemineraldensityandvariousspinaldisordersamendelianrandomizationstudy AT gaohaihao totalbodybonemineraldensityandvariousspinaldisordersamendelianrandomizationstudy AT shixudong totalbodybonemineraldensityandvariousspinaldisordersamendelianrandomizationstudy AT wuyan totalbodybonemineraldensityandvariousspinaldisordersamendelianrandomizationstudy AT niwentao totalbodybonemineraldensityandvariousspinaldisordersamendelianrandomizationstudy AT shangaijia totalbodybonemineraldensityandvariousspinaldisordersamendelianrandomizationstudy |