Cargando…

Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis

BACKGROUND: Patients with Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experienced endocrine disorders that may present vascular function changes. This study aimed to classify and predict PCOS by radial pulse wave parameters using machine learning (ML) methods and to provide evidence for objectifying pulse diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Jiekee, Li, Jieyun, Feng, Xiao, Feng, Lu, Xia, Yumo, Xiao, Xinang, Wang, Yiqin, Xu, Zhaoxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5
_version_ 1785147228502884352
author Lim, Jiekee
Li, Jieyun
Feng, Xiao
Feng, Lu
Xia, Yumo
Xiao, Xinang
Wang, Yiqin
Xu, Zhaoxia
author_facet Lim, Jiekee
Li, Jieyun
Feng, Xiao
Feng, Lu
Xia, Yumo
Xiao, Xinang
Wang, Yiqin
Xu, Zhaoxia
author_sort Lim, Jiekee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experienced endocrine disorders that may present vascular function changes. This study aimed to classify and predict PCOS by radial pulse wave parameters using machine learning (ML) methods and to provide evidence for objectifying pulse diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). METHODS: A case-control study with 459 subjects divided into a PCOS group and a healthy (non-PCOS) group. The pulse wave parameters were measured and analyzed between the two groups. Seven supervised ML classification models were applied, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Voting, and Long Short Term Memory networks (LSTM). Parameters that were significantly different were selected as input features and stratified k-fold cross-validations training was applied to the models. RESULTS: There were 316 subjects in the PCOS group and 143 subjects in the healthy group. Compared to the healthy group, the pulse wave parameters h3/h1 and w/t from both left and right sides were increased while h4, t4, t, As, h4/h1 from both sides and right t1 were decreased in the PCOS group (P < 0.01). Among the ML models evaluated, both the Voting and LSTM with ensemble learning capabilities, demonstrated competitive performance. These models achieved the highest results across all evaluation metrics. Specifically, they both attained a testing accuracy of 72.174% and an F1 score of 0.818, their respective AUC values were 0.715 for the Voting and 0.722 for the LSTM. CONCLUSION: Radial pulse wave signal could identify most PCOS patients accurately (with a good F1 score) and is valuable for early detection and monitoring of PCOS with acceptable overall accuracy. This technique can stimulate the development of individualized PCOS risk assessment using mobile detection technology, furthermore, gives physicians an intuitive understanding of the objective pulse diagnosis of TCM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106444352023-11-13 Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis Lim, Jiekee Li, Jieyun Feng, Xiao Feng, Lu Xia, Yumo Xiao, Xinang Wang, Yiqin Xu, Zhaoxia BMC Complement Med Ther Research BACKGROUND: Patients with Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experienced endocrine disorders that may present vascular function changes. This study aimed to classify and predict PCOS by radial pulse wave parameters using machine learning (ML) methods and to provide evidence for objectifying pulse diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). METHODS: A case-control study with 459 subjects divided into a PCOS group and a healthy (non-PCOS) group. The pulse wave parameters were measured and analyzed between the two groups. Seven supervised ML classification models were applied, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Voting, and Long Short Term Memory networks (LSTM). Parameters that were significantly different were selected as input features and stratified k-fold cross-validations training was applied to the models. RESULTS: There were 316 subjects in the PCOS group and 143 subjects in the healthy group. Compared to the healthy group, the pulse wave parameters h3/h1 and w/t from both left and right sides were increased while h4, t4, t, As, h4/h1 from both sides and right t1 were decreased in the PCOS group (P < 0.01). Among the ML models evaluated, both the Voting and LSTM with ensemble learning capabilities, demonstrated competitive performance. These models achieved the highest results across all evaluation metrics. Specifically, they both attained a testing accuracy of 72.174% and an F1 score of 0.818, their respective AUC values were 0.715 for the Voting and 0.722 for the LSTM. CONCLUSION: Radial pulse wave signal could identify most PCOS patients accurately (with a good F1 score) and is valuable for early detection and monitoring of PCOS with acceptable overall accuracy. This technique can stimulate the development of individualized PCOS risk assessment using mobile detection technology, furthermore, gives physicians an intuitive understanding of the objective pulse diagnosis of TCM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5. BioMed Central 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10644435/ /pubmed/37957660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lim, Jiekee
Li, Jieyun
Feng, Xiao
Feng, Lu
Xia, Yumo
Xiao, Xinang
Wang, Yiqin
Xu, Zhaoxia
Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
title Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
title_full Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
title_fullStr Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
title_short Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
title_sort machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5
work_keys_str_mv AT limjiekee machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis
AT lijieyun machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis
AT fengxiao machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis
AT fenglu machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis
AT xiayumo machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis
AT xiaoxinang machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis
AT wangyiqin machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis
AT xuzhaoxia machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis