Cargando…
Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis
BACKGROUND: Patients with Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experienced endocrine disorders that may present vascular function changes. This study aimed to classify and predict PCOS by radial pulse wave parameters using machine learning (ML) methods and to provide evidence for objectifying pulse diag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5 |
_version_ | 1785147228502884352 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Jiekee Li, Jieyun Feng, Xiao Feng, Lu Xia, Yumo Xiao, Xinang Wang, Yiqin Xu, Zhaoxia |
author_facet | Lim, Jiekee Li, Jieyun Feng, Xiao Feng, Lu Xia, Yumo Xiao, Xinang Wang, Yiqin Xu, Zhaoxia |
author_sort | Lim, Jiekee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experienced endocrine disorders that may present vascular function changes. This study aimed to classify and predict PCOS by radial pulse wave parameters using machine learning (ML) methods and to provide evidence for objectifying pulse diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). METHODS: A case-control study with 459 subjects divided into a PCOS group and a healthy (non-PCOS) group. The pulse wave parameters were measured and analyzed between the two groups. Seven supervised ML classification models were applied, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Voting, and Long Short Term Memory networks (LSTM). Parameters that were significantly different were selected as input features and stratified k-fold cross-validations training was applied to the models. RESULTS: There were 316 subjects in the PCOS group and 143 subjects in the healthy group. Compared to the healthy group, the pulse wave parameters h3/h1 and w/t from both left and right sides were increased while h4, t4, t, As, h4/h1 from both sides and right t1 were decreased in the PCOS group (P < 0.01). Among the ML models evaluated, both the Voting and LSTM with ensemble learning capabilities, demonstrated competitive performance. These models achieved the highest results across all evaluation metrics. Specifically, they both attained a testing accuracy of 72.174% and an F1 score of 0.818, their respective AUC values were 0.715 for the Voting and 0.722 for the LSTM. CONCLUSION: Radial pulse wave signal could identify most PCOS patients accurately (with a good F1 score) and is valuable for early detection and monitoring of PCOS with acceptable overall accuracy. This technique can stimulate the development of individualized PCOS risk assessment using mobile detection technology, furthermore, gives physicians an intuitive understanding of the objective pulse diagnosis of TCM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106444352023-11-13 Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis Lim, Jiekee Li, Jieyun Feng, Xiao Feng, Lu Xia, Yumo Xiao, Xinang Wang, Yiqin Xu, Zhaoxia BMC Complement Med Ther Research BACKGROUND: Patients with Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experienced endocrine disorders that may present vascular function changes. This study aimed to classify and predict PCOS by radial pulse wave parameters using machine learning (ML) methods and to provide evidence for objectifying pulse diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). METHODS: A case-control study with 459 subjects divided into a PCOS group and a healthy (non-PCOS) group. The pulse wave parameters were measured and analyzed between the two groups. Seven supervised ML classification models were applied, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Voting, and Long Short Term Memory networks (LSTM). Parameters that were significantly different were selected as input features and stratified k-fold cross-validations training was applied to the models. RESULTS: There were 316 subjects in the PCOS group and 143 subjects in the healthy group. Compared to the healthy group, the pulse wave parameters h3/h1 and w/t from both left and right sides were increased while h4, t4, t, As, h4/h1 from both sides and right t1 were decreased in the PCOS group (P < 0.01). Among the ML models evaluated, both the Voting and LSTM with ensemble learning capabilities, demonstrated competitive performance. These models achieved the highest results across all evaluation metrics. Specifically, they both attained a testing accuracy of 72.174% and an F1 score of 0.818, their respective AUC values were 0.715 for the Voting and 0.722 for the LSTM. CONCLUSION: Radial pulse wave signal could identify most PCOS patients accurately (with a good F1 score) and is valuable for early detection and monitoring of PCOS with acceptable overall accuracy. This technique can stimulate the development of individualized PCOS risk assessment using mobile detection technology, furthermore, gives physicians an intuitive understanding of the objective pulse diagnosis of TCM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5. BioMed Central 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10644435/ /pubmed/37957660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lim, Jiekee Li, Jieyun Feng, Xiao Feng, Lu Xia, Yumo Xiao, Xinang Wang, Yiqin Xu, Zhaoxia Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis |
title | Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis |
title_full | Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis |
title_fullStr | Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis |
title_short | Machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis |
title_sort | machine learning classification of polycystic ovary syndrome based on radial pulse wave analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04249-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limjiekee machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis AT lijieyun machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis AT fengxiao machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis AT fenglu machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis AT xiayumo machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis AT xiaoxinang machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis AT wangyiqin machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis AT xuzhaoxia machinelearningclassificationofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonradialpulsewaveanalysis |