Cargando…

Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) are commonly used in a sequential regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of early, high-risk or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Novel approaches to increase the response rate combine this treatment with immunotherapies such as PD-1 in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wimmer, Kerstin, Sachet, Monika, Ramos, Cristiano, Frantal, Sophie, Birnleitner, Hanna, Brostjan, Christine, Exner, Ruth, Filipits, Martin, Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna, Rudas, Margaretha, Bartsch, Rupert, Gnant, Michael, Singer, Christian F., Balic, Marija, Egle, Daniel, Oehler, Rudolf, Fitzal, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-023-02876-x
_version_ 1785147253909880832
author Wimmer, Kerstin
Sachet, Monika
Ramos, Cristiano
Frantal, Sophie
Birnleitner, Hanna
Brostjan, Christine
Exner, Ruth
Filipits, Martin
Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Rudas, Margaretha
Bartsch, Rupert
Gnant, Michael
Singer, Christian F.
Balic, Marija
Egle, Daniel
Oehler, Rudolf
Fitzal, Florian
author_facet Wimmer, Kerstin
Sachet, Monika
Ramos, Cristiano
Frantal, Sophie
Birnleitner, Hanna
Brostjan, Christine
Exner, Ruth
Filipits, Martin
Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Rudas, Margaretha
Bartsch, Rupert
Gnant, Michael
Singer, Christian F.
Balic, Marija
Egle, Daniel
Oehler, Rudolf
Fitzal, Florian
author_sort Wimmer, Kerstin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) are commonly used in a sequential regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of early, high-risk or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Novel approaches to increase the response rate combine this treatment with immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibition. However, the expected stimulatory effect on lymphocytes may depend on the chemotherapy backbone. Therefore, we separately compared the immunomodulatory effects of EC and D in the setting of a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Tumor and blood samples of 154 patients from the ABCSG-34 trial were available (76 patients received four cycles of EC followed by four cycles of D; 78 patients get the reverse treatment sequence). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, circulating lymphocytes and 14 soluble immune mediators were determined at baseline and at drug change. Furthermore, six BC cell lines were treated with E, C or D and co-cultured with immune cells. RESULTS: Initial treatment with four cycles of EC reduced circulating B and T cells by 94% and 45%, respectively. In contrast, no comparable effects on lymphocytes were observed in patients treated with initial four cycles of D. Most immune mediators decreased under EC whereas D-treatment resulted in elevated levels of CXCL10, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its soluble receptor (suPAR). Accordingly, only the exposure of BC cell lines to D induced similar increases as compared to E. While treatment of BC cells with E was associated with cell shrinkage and apoptosis, D induced cell swelling and accumulation of cells in G2 phase. CONCLUSION: The deleterious effect of EC on lymphocytes indicates strong immunosuppressive properties of this combination therapy. D, in contrast, has no effect on lymphocytes, but triggers the secretion of stimulatory proteins in vivo and in vitro, indicating a supportive effect on the immune system. Underlying differences in the induced cell death might be causal. These divergent immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel should be considered when planning future combinations with immunotherapies in breast cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-023-02876-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106445592023-11-14 Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients Wimmer, Kerstin Sachet, Monika Ramos, Cristiano Frantal, Sophie Birnleitner, Hanna Brostjan, Christine Exner, Ruth Filipits, Martin Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna Rudas, Margaretha Bartsch, Rupert Gnant, Michael Singer, Christian F. Balic, Marija Egle, Daniel Oehler, Rudolf Fitzal, Florian J Exp Clin Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: Epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) are commonly used in a sequential regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of early, high-risk or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Novel approaches to increase the response rate combine this treatment with immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibition. However, the expected stimulatory effect on lymphocytes may depend on the chemotherapy backbone. Therefore, we separately compared the immunomodulatory effects of EC and D in the setting of a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Tumor and blood samples of 154 patients from the ABCSG-34 trial were available (76 patients received four cycles of EC followed by four cycles of D; 78 patients get the reverse treatment sequence). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, circulating lymphocytes and 14 soluble immune mediators were determined at baseline and at drug change. Furthermore, six BC cell lines were treated with E, C or D and co-cultured with immune cells. RESULTS: Initial treatment with four cycles of EC reduced circulating B and T cells by 94% and 45%, respectively. In contrast, no comparable effects on lymphocytes were observed in patients treated with initial four cycles of D. Most immune mediators decreased under EC whereas D-treatment resulted in elevated levels of CXCL10, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its soluble receptor (suPAR). Accordingly, only the exposure of BC cell lines to D induced similar increases as compared to E. While treatment of BC cells with E was associated with cell shrinkage and apoptosis, D induced cell swelling and accumulation of cells in G2 phase. CONCLUSION: The deleterious effect of EC on lymphocytes indicates strong immunosuppressive properties of this combination therapy. D, in contrast, has no effect on lymphocytes, but triggers the secretion of stimulatory proteins in vivo and in vitro, indicating a supportive effect on the immune system. Underlying differences in the induced cell death might be causal. These divergent immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel should be considered when planning future combinations with immunotherapies in breast cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-023-02876-x. BioMed Central 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10644559/ /pubmed/37957750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-023-02876-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wimmer, Kerstin
Sachet, Monika
Ramos, Cristiano
Frantal, Sophie
Birnleitner, Hanna
Brostjan, Christine
Exner, Ruth
Filipits, Martin
Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Rudas, Margaretha
Bartsch, Rupert
Gnant, Michael
Singer, Christian F.
Balic, Marija
Egle, Daniel
Oehler, Rudolf
Fitzal, Florian
Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients
title Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients
title_full Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients
title_short Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients
title_sort differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-023-02876-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wimmerkerstin differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT sachetmonika differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT ramoscristiano differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT frantalsophie differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT birnleitnerhanna differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT brostjanchristine differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT exnerruth differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT filipitsmartin differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT bagohorvathzsuzsanna differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT rudasmargaretha differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT bartschrupert differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT gnantmichael differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT singerchristianf differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT balicmarija differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT egledaniel differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT oehlerrudolf differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients
AT fitzalflorian differentialimmunomodulatoryeffectsofepirubicincyclophosphamideanddocetaxelinbreastcancerpatients