Cargando…
Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model
BACKGROUND: Long bone defects resulting from primary trauma or secondary to debridement of fracture-related infection (FRI) remain a major clinical challenge. One approach often used is the induced membrane technique (IMT). The effectiveness of the IMT in infected versus non-infected settings remain...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07031-3 |
_version_ | 1785147256822824960 |
---|---|
author | Siverino, Claudia Vanvelk, Niels Nehrbass, Dirk Mischler, Dominic Geoff Richards, Robert Morgenstern, Mario Zeiter, Stephan Arens, Daniel Fintan Moriarty, Thomas |
author_facet | Siverino, Claudia Vanvelk, Niels Nehrbass, Dirk Mischler, Dominic Geoff Richards, Robert Morgenstern, Mario Zeiter, Stephan Arens, Daniel Fintan Moriarty, Thomas |
author_sort | Siverino, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Long bone defects resulting from primary trauma or secondary to debridement of fracture-related infection (FRI) remain a major clinical challenge. One approach often used is the induced membrane technique (IMT). The effectiveness of the IMT in infected versus non-infected settings remains to be definitively established. In this study we present a new rabbit humerus model and compare the IMT approach between animals with prior infection and non-infected equivalents. METHODS: A 5 mm defect was created in the humerus of New Zealand White rabbits (n = 53) and fixed with a 2.5 mm stainless steel plate. In the non-infected groups, the defect was either left empty (n = 6) or treated using the IMT procedure (PMMA spacer for 3 weeks, n = 6). Additionally, both approaches were applied in animals that were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus 4 weeks prior to defect creation (n = 5 and n = 6, respectively). At the first and second revision surgeries, infected and necrotic tissues were debrided and processed for bacteriological quantification. In the IMT groups, the PMMA spacer was removed 3 weeks post implantation and replaced with a beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold and bone healing observed for a further 10 weeks. Infected groups also received systemic antibiotic therapy. The differences in bone healing between the groups were evaluated radiographically using a modification of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures (RUST) and by semiquantitative histopathology on Giemsa-Eosin-stained sections. RESULTS: The presence of S. aureus infection at revision surgery was required for inclusion to the second stage. At the second revision surgery all collected samples were culture negative confirming successful treatment. In the empty defect group, bone healing was increased in the previously infected animals compared with non-infected controls as revealed by radiography with significantly higher RUST values at 6 weeks (p = 0.0281) and at the end of the study (p = 0.0411) and by histopathology with increased cortical bridging (80% and 100% in cis and trans cortical bridging in infected animals compared to 17% and 67% in the non-infected animals). With the IMT approach, both infected and non-infected animals had positive healing assessments. CONCLUSION: We successfully developed an in vivo model of bone defect healing with IMT with and without infection. Bone defects can heal after an infection with even better outcomes compared to the non-infected setting, although in both cases, the IMT achieved better healing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-07031-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106445712023-11-14 Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model Siverino, Claudia Vanvelk, Niels Nehrbass, Dirk Mischler, Dominic Geoff Richards, Robert Morgenstern, Mario Zeiter, Stephan Arens, Daniel Fintan Moriarty, Thomas BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Long bone defects resulting from primary trauma or secondary to debridement of fracture-related infection (FRI) remain a major clinical challenge. One approach often used is the induced membrane technique (IMT). The effectiveness of the IMT in infected versus non-infected settings remains to be definitively established. In this study we present a new rabbit humerus model and compare the IMT approach between animals with prior infection and non-infected equivalents. METHODS: A 5 mm defect was created in the humerus of New Zealand White rabbits (n = 53) and fixed with a 2.5 mm stainless steel plate. In the non-infected groups, the defect was either left empty (n = 6) or treated using the IMT procedure (PMMA spacer for 3 weeks, n = 6). Additionally, both approaches were applied in animals that were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus 4 weeks prior to defect creation (n = 5 and n = 6, respectively). At the first and second revision surgeries, infected and necrotic tissues were debrided and processed for bacteriological quantification. In the IMT groups, the PMMA spacer was removed 3 weeks post implantation and replaced with a beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold and bone healing observed for a further 10 weeks. Infected groups also received systemic antibiotic therapy. The differences in bone healing between the groups were evaluated radiographically using a modification of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures (RUST) and by semiquantitative histopathology on Giemsa-Eosin-stained sections. RESULTS: The presence of S. aureus infection at revision surgery was required for inclusion to the second stage. At the second revision surgery all collected samples were culture negative confirming successful treatment. In the empty defect group, bone healing was increased in the previously infected animals compared with non-infected controls as revealed by radiography with significantly higher RUST values at 6 weeks (p = 0.0281) and at the end of the study (p = 0.0411) and by histopathology with increased cortical bridging (80% and 100% in cis and trans cortical bridging in infected animals compared to 17% and 67% in the non-infected animals). With the IMT approach, both infected and non-infected animals had positive healing assessments. CONCLUSION: We successfully developed an in vivo model of bone defect healing with IMT with and without infection. Bone defects can heal after an infection with even better outcomes compared to the non-infected setting, although in both cases, the IMT achieved better healing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-07031-3. BioMed Central 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10644571/ /pubmed/37964215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07031-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Siverino, Claudia Vanvelk, Niels Nehrbass, Dirk Mischler, Dominic Geoff Richards, Robert Morgenstern, Mario Zeiter, Stephan Arens, Daniel Fintan Moriarty, Thomas Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model |
title | Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model |
title_full | Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model |
title_fullStr | Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model |
title_short | Comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (IMT) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model |
title_sort | comparative bone healing with induced membrane technique (imt) versus empty defects in septic and aseptic conditions in a novel rabbit humerus model |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07031-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siverinoclaudia comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT vanvelkniels comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT nehrbassdirk comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT mischlerdominic comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT geoffrichardsrobert comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT morgensternmario comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT zeiterstephan comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT arensdaniel comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel AT fintanmoriartythomas comparativebonehealingwithinducedmembranetechniqueimtversusemptydefectsinsepticandasepticconditionsinanovelrabbithumerusmodel |