Cargando…

A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators to differentiate mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) from hepatic metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 343 patients with path...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bao, Wuyongga, Liao, Min, Yang, Jie, Huang, Jiayan, Zeng, Keyu, Lu, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1245686
_version_ 1785134600816689152
author Bao, Wuyongga
Liao, Min
Yang, Jie
Huang, Jiayan
Zeng, Keyu
Lu, Qiang
author_facet Bao, Wuyongga
Liao, Min
Yang, Jie
Huang, Jiayan
Zeng, Keyu
Lu, Qiang
author_sort Bao, Wuyongga
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators to differentiate mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) from hepatic metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 343 patients with pathologically confirmed MF-ICC or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled between October 2018 and July 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation sets at a ratio of 7:3. Preoperative ultrasound features and clinical indicators were retrieved. Univariate logistic regression analysis was employed to select relevant features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish a predictive model, which was presented as a nomogram in training sets. The model’s performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS: The study included 169 patients with MF-ICC and 174 with liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, assigned to training (n=238) and validation (n=105) cohorts. The nomogram incorporated ultrasound features (tumor size, lesion number, echogenicity, tumor necrosis, and rim arterial phase hyperenhancement) and clinical information (serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125). The nomogram demonstrated promising performance in differentiating these two entities in both training and validation sets, with an AUC value of 0.937 (95%CI: 0.907,0.969) and 0.916 (95%CI: 0.863,0.968), respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test and calibration curves confirmed good consistency between predictions and observations. Additionally, decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram’s high clinical practicability. CONCLUSION: The nomogram based on ultrasound features and clinical indicators demonstrated good discrimination performance in differentiating MF-ICC from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, which may enhance clinical decision-making process in managing these challenging diagnostic scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106446732023-01-01 A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma Bao, Wuyongga Liao, Min Yang, Jie Huang, Jiayan Zeng, Keyu Lu, Qiang Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators to differentiate mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) from hepatic metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 343 patients with pathologically confirmed MF-ICC or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled between October 2018 and July 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation sets at a ratio of 7:3. Preoperative ultrasound features and clinical indicators were retrieved. Univariate logistic regression analysis was employed to select relevant features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish a predictive model, which was presented as a nomogram in training sets. The model’s performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS: The study included 169 patients with MF-ICC and 174 with liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, assigned to training (n=238) and validation (n=105) cohorts. The nomogram incorporated ultrasound features (tumor size, lesion number, echogenicity, tumor necrosis, and rim arterial phase hyperenhancement) and clinical information (serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125). The nomogram demonstrated promising performance in differentiating these two entities in both training and validation sets, with an AUC value of 0.937 (95%CI: 0.907,0.969) and 0.916 (95%CI: 0.863,0.968), respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test and calibration curves confirmed good consistency between predictions and observations. Additionally, decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram’s high clinical practicability. CONCLUSION: The nomogram based on ultrasound features and clinical indicators demonstrated good discrimination performance in differentiating MF-ICC from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, which may enhance clinical decision-making process in managing these challenging diagnostic scenarios. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10644673/ /pubmed/38023257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1245686 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bao, Liao, Yang, Huang, Zeng and Lu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Bao, Wuyongga
Liao, Min
Yang, Jie
Huang, Jiayan
Zeng, Keyu
Lu, Qiang
A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma
title A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma
title_full A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma
title_short A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma
title_sort nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1245686
work_keys_str_mv AT baowuyongga anomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT liaomin anomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT yangjie anomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT huangjiayan anomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT zengkeyu anomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT luqiang anomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT baowuyongga nomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT liaomin nomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT yangjie nomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT huangjiayan nomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT zengkeyu nomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma
AT luqiang nomogrambasedonultrasonographicfeaturesandclinicalindicatorsfordifferentiatingmassformingintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaandlivermetastaticcolorectaladenocarcinoma