Cargando…

Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review

People with dementia are excluded from research due to methodological challenges, stigma, and discrimination. Including perspectives of people with dementia across a spectrum of abilities is essential to understanding their perspectives and experiences. Engaging people living with dementia in qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conway, Emma, MacEachen, Ellen, Middleton, Laura, McAiney, Carrie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37871184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14713012231205610
_version_ 1785147278943584256
author Conway, Emma
MacEachen, Ellen
Middleton, Laura
McAiney, Carrie
author_facet Conway, Emma
MacEachen, Ellen
Middleton, Laura
McAiney, Carrie
author_sort Conway, Emma
collection PubMed
description People with dementia are excluded from research due to methodological challenges, stigma, and discrimination. Including perspectives of people with dementia across a spectrum of abilities is essential to understanding their perspectives and experiences. Engaging people living with dementia in qualitative research can require adaptation of methods. Qualitative research is typically considered when researchers seek to understand the perspectives, lived experiences, or opinions of individuals’ social reality. This scoping review explores current use of adapted methods with people with dementia in qualitative research, including methods used and impacts on the engagement as it relates to meeting accessibility needs. This review considered rationales for adaptations provided by authors, particularly whether authors identified a human rights or justice rationale for adapting methods to promote accessibility and engagement. This review began with a search of primary studies using qualitative research methods published in English in OECD countries from 2017 to 2022. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts for inclusion. Full texts were reviewed, and data from included studies were extracted using a pre-determined chart. Content analysis of rationales was conducted and reviewed by all authors. Studies were assessed for findings related to impacts of adapted methods. Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Adaptations to qualitative research methods ranged from minor changes, such as maintaining a familiar interviewer, to more extensive novel methods such as photo-elicitation techniques. Twenty-seven studies provided a rationale for adapting their methods. No studies assessed impacts of their methodology on engagement or accessibility. Five studies observed that their methodology supported engagement. This review helps understand the breadth of adaptations that researchers have made to qualitative research methods to include people with dementia in research. Research is needed to explore adaptations and their impact on engagement of persons with dementia with a range of abilities and backgrounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106446842023-11-14 Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review Conway, Emma MacEachen, Ellen Middleton, Laura McAiney, Carrie Dementia (London) Review Article People with dementia are excluded from research due to methodological challenges, stigma, and discrimination. Including perspectives of people with dementia across a spectrum of abilities is essential to understanding their perspectives and experiences. Engaging people living with dementia in qualitative research can require adaptation of methods. Qualitative research is typically considered when researchers seek to understand the perspectives, lived experiences, or opinions of individuals’ social reality. This scoping review explores current use of adapted methods with people with dementia in qualitative research, including methods used and impacts on the engagement as it relates to meeting accessibility needs. This review considered rationales for adaptations provided by authors, particularly whether authors identified a human rights or justice rationale for adapting methods to promote accessibility and engagement. This review began with a search of primary studies using qualitative research methods published in English in OECD countries from 2017 to 2022. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts for inclusion. Full texts were reviewed, and data from included studies were extracted using a pre-determined chart. Content analysis of rationales was conducted and reviewed by all authors. Studies were assessed for findings related to impacts of adapted methods. Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Adaptations to qualitative research methods ranged from minor changes, such as maintaining a familiar interviewer, to more extensive novel methods such as photo-elicitation techniques. Twenty-seven studies provided a rationale for adapting their methods. No studies assessed impacts of their methodology on engagement or accessibility. Five studies observed that their methodology supported engagement. This review helps understand the breadth of adaptations that researchers have made to qualitative research methods to include people with dementia in research. Research is needed to explore adaptations and their impact on engagement of persons with dementia with a range of abilities and backgrounds. SAGE Publications 2023-10-23 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10644684/ /pubmed/37871184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14713012231205610 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Conway, Emma
MacEachen, Ellen
Middleton, Laura
McAiney, Carrie
Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review
title Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review
title_full Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review
title_fullStr Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review
title_short Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review
title_sort use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37871184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14713012231205610
work_keys_str_mv AT conwayemma useofadaptedormodifiedmethodswithpeoplewithdementiainresearchascopingreview
AT maceachenellen useofadaptedormodifiedmethodswithpeoplewithdementiainresearchascopingreview
AT middletonlaura useofadaptedormodifiedmethodswithpeoplewithdementiainresearchascopingreview
AT mcaineycarrie useofadaptedormodifiedmethodswithpeoplewithdementiainresearchascopingreview