Cargando…

Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions

BACKGROUND: The 2019 European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for endometrial cancer recommend performing either dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE MRI) or single-phase CE MRI. However, no study has directly compared these options. Therefore, this study compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Myoung Seok, Moon, Min Hoan, Kim, Taek Min, Jang, Siwon, Oh, Sohee, Cho, Jeong Yeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549231207833
_version_ 1785147283881328640
author Lee, Myoung Seok
Moon, Min Hoan
Kim, Taek Min
Jang, Siwon
Oh, Sohee
Cho, Jeong Yeon
author_facet Lee, Myoung Seok
Moon, Min Hoan
Kim, Taek Min
Jang, Siwon
Oh, Sohee
Cho, Jeong Yeon
author_sort Lee, Myoung Seok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2019 European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for endometrial cancer recommend performing either dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE MRI) or single-phase CE MRI. However, no study has directly compared these options. Therefore, this study compared dynamic versus single-phase CE MRI for the evaluation of myometrial invasion in women with endometrial cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, single-institution comparative study was conducted among women with surgically proven endometrial cancer, including 30 consecutive women with single-phase CE MRI and 30 age- and pathologic stage-matched women with dynamic CE MRI. Three readers independently compared dynamic and single-phase CE MRI in terms of the tumor-myometrium signal intensity (SI) difference ratio, depth of myometrial invasion, image quality, and image number. Pathologic findings served as a reference standard for the depth of myometrial invasion. RESULTS: The estimated mean SI difference ratios of dynamic CE MRI and single-phase CE MRI fell within an equivalence margin of 0.05 (90% confidence intervals [CIs] = [−0.0497 to −0.0165], [−0.0226 to −0.0403], and [−0.0429 to −0.0433], respectively, for readers A, B, and C). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the detection of deep myometrial invasion was not significantly different between the acquisitions (P = .3315, P = .3345, and P = .8593, respectively). Single-phase CE MRI showed significantly better image quality than dynamic CE MRI (P = .0143, P = .0042, and P = .0066, respectively), while the median number of images for dynamic CE MRI was 2.4 times higher than that for single-phase CE MRI. CONCLUSION: Single-phase acquisition may be a better option for CE MRI in women with endometrial cancer than dynamic acquisition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106447392023-11-13 Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions Lee, Myoung Seok Moon, Min Hoan Kim, Taek Min Jang, Siwon Oh, Sohee Cho, Jeong Yeon Clin Med Insights Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The 2019 European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for endometrial cancer recommend performing either dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE MRI) or single-phase CE MRI. However, no study has directly compared these options. Therefore, this study compared dynamic versus single-phase CE MRI for the evaluation of myometrial invasion in women with endometrial cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, single-institution comparative study was conducted among women with surgically proven endometrial cancer, including 30 consecutive women with single-phase CE MRI and 30 age- and pathologic stage-matched women with dynamic CE MRI. Three readers independently compared dynamic and single-phase CE MRI in terms of the tumor-myometrium signal intensity (SI) difference ratio, depth of myometrial invasion, image quality, and image number. Pathologic findings served as a reference standard for the depth of myometrial invasion. RESULTS: The estimated mean SI difference ratios of dynamic CE MRI and single-phase CE MRI fell within an equivalence margin of 0.05 (90% confidence intervals [CIs] = [−0.0497 to −0.0165], [−0.0226 to −0.0403], and [−0.0429 to −0.0433], respectively, for readers A, B, and C). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the detection of deep myometrial invasion was not significantly different between the acquisitions (P = .3315, P = .3345, and P = .8593, respectively). Single-phase CE MRI showed significantly better image quality than dynamic CE MRI (P = .0143, P = .0042, and P = .0066, respectively), while the median number of images for dynamic CE MRI was 2.4 times higher than that for single-phase CE MRI. CONCLUSION: Single-phase acquisition may be a better option for CE MRI in women with endometrial cancer than dynamic acquisition. SAGE Publications 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10644739/ /pubmed/38023285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549231207833 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lee, Myoung Seok
Moon, Min Hoan
Kim, Taek Min
Jang, Siwon
Oh, Sohee
Cho, Jeong Yeon
Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions
title Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions
title_full Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions
title_fullStr Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions
title_full_unstemmed Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions
title_short Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions
title_sort contrast-enhanced mri in women with endometrial cancer: dynamic versus single-phase acquisitions
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549231207833
work_keys_str_mv AT leemyoungseok contrastenhancedmriinwomenwithendometrialcancerdynamicversussinglephaseacquisitions
AT moonminhoan contrastenhancedmriinwomenwithendometrialcancerdynamicversussinglephaseacquisitions
AT kimtaekmin contrastenhancedmriinwomenwithendometrialcancerdynamicversussinglephaseacquisitions
AT jangsiwon contrastenhancedmriinwomenwithendometrialcancerdynamicversussinglephaseacquisitions
AT ohsohee contrastenhancedmriinwomenwithendometrialcancerdynamicversussinglephaseacquisitions
AT chojeongyeon contrastenhancedmriinwomenwithendometrialcancerdynamicversussinglephaseacquisitions