Cargando…

Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins

Bacteriophages such as γ and AP50c have been shown to infect strains of Bacillus anthracis with high specificity, and this feature has been exploited in the development of bacterial detection assays. To better understand the emergence of phage resistance, and thus the potential failure of such assay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forrest, Samantha, Ton, Sarah, Sholes, Samantha L., Harrison, Sarah, Plaut, Roger D., Verratti, Kathleen, Wittekind, Michael, Ettehadieh, Elham, Necciai, Bryan, Sozhamannan, Shanmuga, Grady, Sarah L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1278791
_version_ 1785134618240876544
author Forrest, Samantha
Ton, Sarah
Sholes, Samantha L.
Harrison, Sarah
Plaut, Roger D.
Verratti, Kathleen
Wittekind, Michael
Ettehadieh, Elham
Necciai, Bryan
Sozhamannan, Shanmuga
Grady, Sarah L.
author_facet Forrest, Samantha
Ton, Sarah
Sholes, Samantha L.
Harrison, Sarah
Plaut, Roger D.
Verratti, Kathleen
Wittekind, Michael
Ettehadieh, Elham
Necciai, Bryan
Sozhamannan, Shanmuga
Grady, Sarah L.
author_sort Forrest, Samantha
collection PubMed
description Bacteriophages such as γ and AP50c have been shown to infect strains of Bacillus anthracis with high specificity, and this feature has been exploited in the development of bacterial detection assays. To better understand the emergence of phage resistance, and thus the potential failure of such assays, it is important to identify the host and phage receptors necessary for attachment and entry. Using genetic approaches, the bacterial receptors of AP50c and γ have been identified as sap and GamR, respectively. A second AP50c-like phage, Wip1, also appears to use sap as a receptor. In parallel with this work, the cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins (RBPs) have also been identified (Gp14 for γ, P28 for AP50c, and P23 for Wip1); however, the strength of evidence supporting these protein–protein interactions varies, necessitating additional investigation. Here, we present genetic evidence further supporting the interaction between sap and the RBPs of AP50c and Wip1 using fluorescently tagged proteins and a panel of B. anthracis mutants. These results showed that the deletion of the sap gene, as well as the deletion of csaB, whose encoded protein anchors sap to the bacterial S-layer, resulted in the loss of RBP binding. Binding could then be rescued by expressing these genes in trans. We also found that the RBP of the γ-like prophage λBa03 relied on csaB activity for binding, possibly by a different mechanism. RBP(λBa03) binding to B. anthracis cells was also unique in that it was not ablated by heat inactivation of vegetative cells, suggesting that its receptor is still functional following incubation at 98°C. These results extend our understanding of the diverse attachment and entry strategies used by B. anthracis phages, enabling future assay development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106447602023-10-31 Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins Forrest, Samantha Ton, Sarah Sholes, Samantha L. Harrison, Sarah Plaut, Roger D. Verratti, Kathleen Wittekind, Michael Ettehadieh, Elham Necciai, Bryan Sozhamannan, Shanmuga Grady, Sarah L. Front Microbiol Microbiology Bacteriophages such as γ and AP50c have been shown to infect strains of Bacillus anthracis with high specificity, and this feature has been exploited in the development of bacterial detection assays. To better understand the emergence of phage resistance, and thus the potential failure of such assays, it is important to identify the host and phage receptors necessary for attachment and entry. Using genetic approaches, the bacterial receptors of AP50c and γ have been identified as sap and GamR, respectively. A second AP50c-like phage, Wip1, also appears to use sap as a receptor. In parallel with this work, the cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins (RBPs) have also been identified (Gp14 for γ, P28 for AP50c, and P23 for Wip1); however, the strength of evidence supporting these protein–protein interactions varies, necessitating additional investigation. Here, we present genetic evidence further supporting the interaction between sap and the RBPs of AP50c and Wip1 using fluorescently tagged proteins and a panel of B. anthracis mutants. These results showed that the deletion of the sap gene, as well as the deletion of csaB, whose encoded protein anchors sap to the bacterial S-layer, resulted in the loss of RBP binding. Binding could then be rescued by expressing these genes in trans. We also found that the RBP of the γ-like prophage λBa03 relied on csaB activity for binding, possibly by a different mechanism. RBP(λBa03) binding to B. anthracis cells was also unique in that it was not ablated by heat inactivation of vegetative cells, suggesting that its receptor is still functional following incubation at 98°C. These results extend our understanding of the diverse attachment and entry strategies used by B. anthracis phages, enabling future assay development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10644760/ /pubmed/38029077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1278791 Text en Copyright © 2023 Forrest, Ton, Sholes, Harrison, Plaut, Verratti, Wittekind, Ettehadieh, Necciai, Sozhamannan and Grady. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Forrest, Samantha
Ton, Sarah
Sholes, Samantha L.
Harrison, Sarah
Plaut, Roger D.
Verratti, Kathleen
Wittekind, Michael
Ettehadieh, Elham
Necciai, Bryan
Sozhamannan, Shanmuga
Grady, Sarah L.
Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins
title Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins
title_full Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins
title_fullStr Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins
title_full_unstemmed Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins
title_short Genetic evidence for the interaction between Bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins
title_sort genetic evidence for the interaction between bacillus anthracis-encoded phage receptors and their cognate phage-encoded receptor binding proteins
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1278791
work_keys_str_mv AT forrestsamantha geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT tonsarah geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT sholessamanthal geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT harrisonsarah geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT plautrogerd geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT verrattikathleen geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT wittekindmichael geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT ettehadiehelham geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT necciaibryan geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT sozhamannanshanmuga geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins
AT gradysarahl geneticevidencefortheinteractionbetweenbacillusanthracisencodedphagereceptorsandtheircognatephageencodedreceptorbindingproteins