Cargando…

Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. PURPOSE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo, Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi, Pavão, Douglas Mello, Radulski, Mariana, Leal, Ana Carolina, More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo, Mozella, Alan de Paula, Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus, LaPrade, Robert F, Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello, Salim, Rodrigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231209951
_version_ 1785147287181197312
author Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo
Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi
Pavão, Douglas Mello
Radulski, Mariana
Leal, Ana Carolina
More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo
Mozella, Alan de Paula
Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus
LaPrade, Robert F
Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello
Salim, Rodrigo
author_facet Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo
Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi
Pavão, Douglas Mello
Radulski, Mariana
Leal, Ana Carolina
More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo
Mozella, Alan de Paula
Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus
LaPrade, Robert F
Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello
Salim, Rodrigo
author_sort Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 ± 0.12 and 0.48 ± 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .2792). The stiffness at the ultimate load testing was 36.3 ± 1.9 and 35.3 ± 2.4 N/mm for groups CS and IO, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .2557). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 218.2 ± 63.9 and 238.3 ± 71.3 N in the CS and IO groups, respectively, with no significant group differences (P = .3062). CONCLUSION: A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106447612023-11-13 Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi Pavão, Douglas Mello Radulski, Mariana Leal, Ana Carolina More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo Mozella, Alan de Paula Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus LaPrade, Robert F Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Salim, Rodrigo Orthop J Sports Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 ± 0.12 and 0.48 ± 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .2792). The stiffness at the ultimate load testing was 36.3 ± 1.9 and 35.3 ± 2.4 N/mm for groups CS and IO, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .2557). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 218.2 ± 63.9 and 238.3 ± 71.3 N in the CS and IO groups, respectively, with no significant group differences (P = .3062). CONCLUSION: A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option. SAGE Publications 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10644761/ /pubmed/38021309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231209951 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo
Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi
Pavão, Douglas Mello
Radulski, Mariana
Leal, Ana Carolina
More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo
Mozella, Alan de Paula
Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus
LaPrade, Robert F
Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello
Salim, Rodrigo
Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
title Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
title_full Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
title_fullStr Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
title_short Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
title_sort continuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231209951
work_keys_str_mv AT rochadefariajoseleonardo continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT santosarthurpaivagrimaldi continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT pavaodouglasmello continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT radulskimariana continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT lealanacarolina continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT morearidigiacomoocampo continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT mozellaalandepaula continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT guimaraesjoaoantoniomatheus continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT lapraderobertf continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT roeslercarlosrodrigodemello continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison
AT salimrodrigo continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison