Cargando…
Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. PURPOSE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231209951 |
_version_ | 1785147287181197312 |
---|---|
author | Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi Pavão, Douglas Mello Radulski, Mariana Leal, Ana Carolina More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo Mozella, Alan de Paula Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus LaPrade, Robert F Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Salim, Rodrigo |
author_facet | Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi Pavão, Douglas Mello Radulski, Mariana Leal, Ana Carolina More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo Mozella, Alan de Paula Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus LaPrade, Robert F Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Salim, Rodrigo |
author_sort | Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 ± 0.12 and 0.48 ± 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .2792). The stiffness at the ultimate load testing was 36.3 ± 1.9 and 35.3 ± 2.4 N/mm for groups CS and IO, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .2557). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 218.2 ± 63.9 and 238.3 ± 71.3 N in the CS and IO groups, respectively, with no significant group differences (P = .3062). CONCLUSION: A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106447612023-11-13 Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi Pavão, Douglas Mello Radulski, Mariana Leal, Ana Carolina More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo Mozella, Alan de Paula Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus LaPrade, Robert F Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Salim, Rodrigo Orthop J Sports Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. PURPOSE: To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 ± 0.12 and 0.48 ± 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .2792). The stiffness at the ultimate load testing was 36.3 ± 1.9 and 35.3 ± 2.4 N/mm for groups CS and IO, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .2557). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 218.2 ± 63.9 and 238.3 ± 71.3 N in the CS and IO groups, respectively, with no significant group differences (P = .3062). CONCLUSION: A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option. SAGE Publications 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10644761/ /pubmed/38021309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231209951 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rocha de Faria, José Leonardo Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi Pavão, Douglas Mello Radulski, Mariana Leal, Ana Carolina More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo Mozella, Alan de Paula Guimarães, João Antonio Matheus LaPrade, Robert F Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Salim, Rodrigo Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison |
title | Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison |
title_full | Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison |
title_fullStr | Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison |
title_short | Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison |
title_sort | continuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231209951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rochadefariajoseleonardo continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT santosarthurpaivagrimaldi continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT pavaodouglasmello continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT radulskimariana continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT lealanacarolina continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT morearidigiacomoocampo continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT mozellaalandepaula continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT guimaraesjoaoantoniomatheus continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT lapraderobertf continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT roeslercarlosrodrigodemello continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison AT salimrodrigo continuousverticalinsideoutversustraditionalverticalinsideoutmeniscalrepairabiomechanicalcomparison |