Cargando…

Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients

INTRODUCTION: With the current surge on peripheral nerve blocks in post-cesarean pain management and the historical lack of unequivocal evidence supporting its universal use, this review intended to re-examine the extended scope of literature on regional anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in low...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silverman, Matthew, Zwolinski, Nicholas, Wang, Ethan, Lockwood, Nishita, Ancuta, Michael, Jin, Evan, Li, Jinlei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026463
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S428332
_version_ 1785134635388239872
author Silverman, Matthew
Zwolinski, Nicholas
Wang, Ethan
Lockwood, Nishita
Ancuta, Michael
Jin, Evan
Li, Jinlei
author_facet Silverman, Matthew
Zwolinski, Nicholas
Wang, Ethan
Lockwood, Nishita
Ancuta, Michael
Jin, Evan
Li, Jinlei
author_sort Silverman, Matthew
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With the current surge on peripheral nerve blocks in post-cesarean pain management and the historical lack of unequivocal evidence supporting its universal use, this review intended to re-examine the extended scope of literature on regional anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in low-transverse cesarean section. METHODS: A literature search was conducted up to April 2023 using PubMed to identify articles relevant to our search words “cesarean section”, “neuraxial morphine”, “post-cesarean analgesia”, as well as the name of each individual nerve block. The literature search was ultimately narrowed to systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials published between 2012 and 2023. We define, describe, and discuss the evidence surrounding each individual regional anesthetic technique in the presence and absence of intrathecal morphine, which is used as the gold standard when appropriate. RESULTS: In the absence of neuraxial morphine, all regional anesthetic techniques have some level of analgesic benefit in the post-cesarean analgesia. Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks continue to have the most studies in their use. Newer fascia plane blocks including the anterior Quadratus Lumborum, and Erector Spinae Plane blocks provide significant analgesia. In addition, direct comparison among peripheral nerve blocks consistently favors the more proximal, centralized techniques. Conversely, in the presence of neuraxial morphine, no peripheral anesthetic technique has reliably and reproducibly demonstrated an added analgesic benefit regardless of the peripheral nerve block technique or location of local anesthetic injection in the post-cesarean population. CONCLUSION: Neuraxial morphine continues to be the gold standard for post-cesarean section analgesia, the benefit of additional single injection regional anesthetic is currently not evidence supported. In cases where neuraxial opioids have not or cannot be given, there is overwhelming evidence that regional anesthetic techniques improve post-cesarean section analgesia and decrease post-operative opioid consumption. Even though there is no consensus on the optimal peripheral nerve block, emerging evidence suggests more centralized abdominal fascia plane block trends towards better analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106448372023-11-10 Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients Silverman, Matthew Zwolinski, Nicholas Wang, Ethan Lockwood, Nishita Ancuta, Michael Jin, Evan Li, Jinlei J Pain Res Review INTRODUCTION: With the current surge on peripheral nerve blocks in post-cesarean pain management and the historical lack of unequivocal evidence supporting its universal use, this review intended to re-examine the extended scope of literature on regional anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in low-transverse cesarean section. METHODS: A literature search was conducted up to April 2023 using PubMed to identify articles relevant to our search words “cesarean section”, “neuraxial morphine”, “post-cesarean analgesia”, as well as the name of each individual nerve block. The literature search was ultimately narrowed to systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials published between 2012 and 2023. We define, describe, and discuss the evidence surrounding each individual regional anesthetic technique in the presence and absence of intrathecal morphine, which is used as the gold standard when appropriate. RESULTS: In the absence of neuraxial morphine, all regional anesthetic techniques have some level of analgesic benefit in the post-cesarean analgesia. Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks continue to have the most studies in their use. Newer fascia plane blocks including the anterior Quadratus Lumborum, and Erector Spinae Plane blocks provide significant analgesia. In addition, direct comparison among peripheral nerve blocks consistently favors the more proximal, centralized techniques. Conversely, in the presence of neuraxial morphine, no peripheral anesthetic technique has reliably and reproducibly demonstrated an added analgesic benefit regardless of the peripheral nerve block technique or location of local anesthetic injection in the post-cesarean population. CONCLUSION: Neuraxial morphine continues to be the gold standard for post-cesarean section analgesia, the benefit of additional single injection regional anesthetic is currently not evidence supported. In cases where neuraxial opioids have not or cannot be given, there is overwhelming evidence that regional anesthetic techniques improve post-cesarean section analgesia and decrease post-operative opioid consumption. Even though there is no consensus on the optimal peripheral nerve block, emerging evidence suggests more centralized abdominal fascia plane block trends towards better analgesia. Dove 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10644837/ /pubmed/38026463 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S428332 Text en © 2023 Silverman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Silverman, Matthew
Zwolinski, Nicholas
Wang, Ethan
Lockwood, Nishita
Ancuta, Michael
Jin, Evan
Li, Jinlei
Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients
title Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients
title_full Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients
title_fullStr Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients
title_full_unstemmed Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients
title_short Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients
title_sort regional analgesia for cesarean delivery: a narrative review toward enhancing outcomes in parturients
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026463
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S428332
work_keys_str_mv AT silvermanmatthew regionalanalgesiaforcesareandeliveryanarrativereviewtowardenhancingoutcomesinparturients
AT zwolinskinicholas regionalanalgesiaforcesareandeliveryanarrativereviewtowardenhancingoutcomesinparturients
AT wangethan regionalanalgesiaforcesareandeliveryanarrativereviewtowardenhancingoutcomesinparturients
AT lockwoodnishita regionalanalgesiaforcesareandeliveryanarrativereviewtowardenhancingoutcomesinparturients
AT ancutamichael regionalanalgesiaforcesareandeliveryanarrativereviewtowardenhancingoutcomesinparturients
AT jinevan regionalanalgesiaforcesareandeliveryanarrativereviewtowardenhancingoutcomesinparturients
AT lijinlei regionalanalgesiaforcesareandeliveryanarrativereviewtowardenhancingoutcomesinparturients