Cargando…

Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability

Humans have evolved culturally and perhaps genetically to be unsustainable. We exhibit a deep and consistent pattern of short-term resource exploitation behaviours and institutions. We distinguish agentic and naturally selective forces in cultural evolution. Agentic forces are quite important compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richerson, Peter J., Boyd, Robert T., Efferson, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0252
_version_ 1785147318148792320
author Richerson, Peter J.
Boyd, Robert T.
Efferson, Charles
author_facet Richerson, Peter J.
Boyd, Robert T.
Efferson, Charles
author_sort Richerson, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description Humans have evolved culturally and perhaps genetically to be unsustainable. We exhibit a deep and consistent pattern of short-term resource exploitation behaviours and institutions. We distinguish agentic and naturally selective forces in cultural evolution. Agentic forces are quite important compared to the blind forces (random variation and natural selection) in cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution. We need to use the agentic policy-making processes to evade the impact of blind natural selection. We argue that agentic forces became important during our Pleistocene history and into the Anthropocene present. Human creativity in the form of deliberate innovations and the deliberate selective diffusion of technical and social advances drove this process forward for a long time before planetary limits became a serious issue. We review models with multiple positive feedbacks that roughly fit this observed pattern. Policy changes in the case of large-scale existential threats like climate change are made by political and diplomatic agents grasping and moving levers of institutional power in order to avoid the operation of blind natural selection and agentic forces driven by narrow or short-term goals. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10645076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2024
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106450762023-11-14 Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability Richerson, Peter J. Boyd, Robert T. Efferson, Charles Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve? Humans have evolved culturally and perhaps genetically to be unsustainable. We exhibit a deep and consistent pattern of short-term resource exploitation behaviours and institutions. We distinguish agentic and naturally selective forces in cultural evolution. Agentic forces are quite important compared to the blind forces (random variation and natural selection) in cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution. We need to use the agentic policy-making processes to evade the impact of blind natural selection. We argue that agentic forces became important during our Pleistocene history and into the Anthropocene present. Human creativity in the form of deliberate innovations and the deliberate selective diffusion of technical and social advances drove this process forward for a long time before planetary limits became a serious issue. We review models with multiple positive feedbacks that roughly fit this observed pattern. Policy changes in the case of large-scale existential threats like climate change are made by political and diplomatic agents grasping and moving levers of institutional power in order to avoid the operation of blind natural selection and agentic forces driven by narrow or short-term goals. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’. The Royal Society 2024-01-01 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10645076/ /pubmed/37952614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0252 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve?
Richerson, Peter J.
Boyd, Robert T.
Efferson, Charles
Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability
title Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability
title_full Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability
title_fullStr Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability
title_full_unstemmed Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability
title_short Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability
title_sort agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to anthropocene sustainability
topic Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0252
work_keys_str_mv AT richersonpeterj agenticprocessesinculturalevolutionrelevancetoanthropocenesustainability
AT boydrobertt agenticprocessesinculturalevolutionrelevancetoanthropocenesustainability
AT effersoncharles agenticprocessesinculturalevolutionrelevancetoanthropocenesustainability