Cargando…
Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability
Humans have evolved culturally and perhaps genetically to be unsustainable. We exhibit a deep and consistent pattern of short-term resource exploitation behaviours and institutions. We distinguish agentic and naturally selective forces in cultural evolution. Agentic forces are quite important compar...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2024
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0252 |
_version_ | 1785147318148792320 |
---|---|
author | Richerson, Peter J. Boyd, Robert T. Efferson, Charles |
author_facet | Richerson, Peter J. Boyd, Robert T. Efferson, Charles |
author_sort | Richerson, Peter J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans have evolved culturally and perhaps genetically to be unsustainable. We exhibit a deep and consistent pattern of short-term resource exploitation behaviours and institutions. We distinguish agentic and naturally selective forces in cultural evolution. Agentic forces are quite important compared to the blind forces (random variation and natural selection) in cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution. We need to use the agentic policy-making processes to evade the impact of blind natural selection. We argue that agentic forces became important during our Pleistocene history and into the Anthropocene present. Human creativity in the form of deliberate innovations and the deliberate selective diffusion of technical and social advances drove this process forward for a long time before planetary limits became a serious issue. We review models with multiple positive feedbacks that roughly fit this observed pattern. Policy changes in the case of large-scale existential threats like climate change are made by political and diplomatic agents grasping and moving levers of institutional power in order to avoid the operation of blind natural selection and agentic forces driven by narrow or short-term goals. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10645076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106450762023-11-14 Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability Richerson, Peter J. Boyd, Robert T. Efferson, Charles Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve? Humans have evolved culturally and perhaps genetically to be unsustainable. We exhibit a deep and consistent pattern of short-term resource exploitation behaviours and institutions. We distinguish agentic and naturally selective forces in cultural evolution. Agentic forces are quite important compared to the blind forces (random variation and natural selection) in cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution. We need to use the agentic policy-making processes to evade the impact of blind natural selection. We argue that agentic forces became important during our Pleistocene history and into the Anthropocene present. Human creativity in the form of deliberate innovations and the deliberate selective diffusion of technical and social advances drove this process forward for a long time before planetary limits became a serious issue. We review models with multiple positive feedbacks that roughly fit this observed pattern. Policy changes in the case of large-scale existential threats like climate change are made by political and diplomatic agents grasping and moving levers of institutional power in order to avoid the operation of blind natural selection and agentic forces driven by narrow or short-term goals. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’. The Royal Society 2024-01-01 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10645076/ /pubmed/37952614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0252 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve? Richerson, Peter J. Boyd, Robert T. Efferson, Charles Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability |
title | Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability |
title_full | Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability |
title_fullStr | Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability |
title_full_unstemmed | Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability |
title_short | Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability |
title_sort | agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to anthropocene sustainability |
topic | Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve? |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richersonpeterj agenticprocessesinculturalevolutionrelevancetoanthropocenesustainability AT boydrobertt agenticprocessesinculturalevolutionrelevancetoanthropocenesustainability AT effersoncharles agenticprocessesinculturalevolutionrelevancetoanthropocenesustainability |