Cargando…

Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case

The overall trajectory for the human–environment interaction has been punctuated by demographic boom-and-bust cycles, phases of growth/overshooting as well as of expansion/contraction in productivity. Although this pattern has been explained in terms of an interplay between population growth, social...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gayo, Eugenia M., Lima, Mauricio, Gurruchaga, Andone, Estay, Sergio A., Santoro, Calogero M., Latorre, Claudio, McRostie, Virginia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0253
_version_ 1785147318368993280
author Gayo, Eugenia M.
Lima, Mauricio
Gurruchaga, Andone
Estay, Sergio A.
Santoro, Calogero M.
Latorre, Claudio
McRostie, Virginia
author_facet Gayo, Eugenia M.
Lima, Mauricio
Gurruchaga, Andone
Estay, Sergio A.
Santoro, Calogero M.
Latorre, Claudio
McRostie, Virginia
author_sort Gayo, Eugenia M.
collection PubMed
description The overall trajectory for the human–environment interaction has been punctuated by demographic boom-and-bust cycles, phases of growth/overshooting as well as of expansion/contraction in productivity. Although this pattern has been explained in terms of an interplay between population growth, social upscaling, ecosystem engineering and climate variability, the evoked demographic–resource-complexity mechanisms have not been empirically tested. By integrating proxy data for population sizes, palaeoclimate and internal societal factors into empirical modelling approaches from the population dynamic theory, we evaluated how endogenous (population sizes, warfare and social upscaling) and exogenous (climate) variables module the dynamic in past agrarian societies. We focused on the inland Atacama Desert, where populations developed agriculture activities by engineering arid and semi-arid landscapes during the last 2000 years. Our modelling approach indicates that these populations experienced a boom-and-bust dynamic over the last millennia, which was coupled to structure feedback between population sizes, hydroclimate, social upscaling, warfare and ecosystem engineering. Thus, the human–environment loop appears closely linked with cooperation, competition, limiting resources and the ability of problem-solving. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10645077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2024
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106450772023-11-14 Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case Gayo, Eugenia M. Lima, Mauricio Gurruchaga, Andone Estay, Sergio A. Santoro, Calogero M. Latorre, Claudio McRostie, Virginia Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve? The overall trajectory for the human–environment interaction has been punctuated by demographic boom-and-bust cycles, phases of growth/overshooting as well as of expansion/contraction in productivity. Although this pattern has been explained in terms of an interplay between population growth, social upscaling, ecosystem engineering and climate variability, the evoked demographic–resource-complexity mechanisms have not been empirically tested. By integrating proxy data for population sizes, palaeoclimate and internal societal factors into empirical modelling approaches from the population dynamic theory, we evaluated how endogenous (population sizes, warfare and social upscaling) and exogenous (climate) variables module the dynamic in past agrarian societies. We focused on the inland Atacama Desert, where populations developed agriculture activities by engineering arid and semi-arid landscapes during the last 2000 years. Our modelling approach indicates that these populations experienced a boom-and-bust dynamic over the last millennia, which was coupled to structure feedback between population sizes, hydroclimate, social upscaling, warfare and ecosystem engineering. Thus, the human–environment loop appears closely linked with cooperation, competition, limiting resources and the ability of problem-solving. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’. The Royal Society 2024-01-01 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10645077/ /pubmed/37952616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0253 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve?
Gayo, Eugenia M.
Lima, Mauricio
Gurruchaga, Andone
Estay, Sergio A.
Santoro, Calogero M.
Latorre, Claudio
McRostie, Virginia
Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case
title Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case
title_full Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case
title_fullStr Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case
title_full_unstemmed Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case
title_short Towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the Atacama Desert case
title_sort towards understanding human–environment feedback loops: the atacama desert case
topic Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0253
work_keys_str_mv AT gayoeugeniam towardsunderstandinghumanenvironmentfeedbackloopstheatacamadesertcase
AT limamauricio towardsunderstandinghumanenvironmentfeedbackloopstheatacamadesertcase
AT gurruchagaandone towardsunderstandinghumanenvironmentfeedbackloopstheatacamadesertcase
AT estaysergioa towardsunderstandinghumanenvironmentfeedbackloopstheatacamadesertcase
AT santorocalogerom towardsunderstandinghumanenvironmentfeedbackloopstheatacamadesertcase
AT latorreclaudio towardsunderstandinghumanenvironmentfeedbackloopstheatacamadesertcase
AT mcrostievirginia towardsunderstandinghumanenvironmentfeedbackloopstheatacamadesertcase