Cargando…

Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution

In this paper, we argue that the development, uptake and adoption of innovations resembles an evolutionary process of variation, selection and retention (within broader processes of co-evolution) in which actors are myopically caught. We do so in four steps. First, we review in what ways socio-techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kemp, René, van Lente, Harro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0270
_version_ 1785147318837706752
author Kemp, René
van Lente, Harro
author_facet Kemp, René
van Lente, Harro
author_sort Kemp, René
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we argue that the development, uptake and adoption of innovations resembles an evolutionary process of variation, selection and retention (within broader processes of co-evolution) in which actors are myopically caught. We do so in four steps. First, we review in what ways socio-technical evolution resembles biological evolution. Second, we argue that in socio-technical evolution so-called ‘configurations that work’ can be viewed as evolutionary units, which are subject to selection pressures, variation and human-made couplings between variation and selection. This explains why innovation is often cumulative, based on variation and recombination. Third, we discuss how producers, consumers, governments and scientists are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution. While humans are capable of imagining the need for system change and details of desired systems, they are less capable of accepting the concomitant higher costs and inconveniences and adopt new interpretive schemes. Fourth, in a pluralist world, steering is done by all kind of actors, including those who actively resist transformative change. Because of this, steering by government and coalitions of change can achieve little more than a modulation of ongoing dynamics, despite disturbing evidence of a run-away climate, mass extinction, pervasive ecological degradation and steady depletion of resources. A new consciousness of the Anthropocene can evoke fundamental changes in science and the economy if—and only if—they are sufficiently carried by institutional changes and new practices. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10645083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2024
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106450832023-11-14 Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution Kemp, René van Lente, Harro Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part II: Present - Evolutionary Dynamics of the Anthropocene In this paper, we argue that the development, uptake and adoption of innovations resembles an evolutionary process of variation, selection and retention (within broader processes of co-evolution) in which actors are myopically caught. We do so in four steps. First, we review in what ways socio-technical evolution resembles biological evolution. Second, we argue that in socio-technical evolution so-called ‘configurations that work’ can be viewed as evolutionary units, which are subject to selection pressures, variation and human-made couplings between variation and selection. This explains why innovation is often cumulative, based on variation and recombination. Third, we discuss how producers, consumers, governments and scientists are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution. While humans are capable of imagining the need for system change and details of desired systems, they are less capable of accepting the concomitant higher costs and inconveniences and adopt new interpretive schemes. Fourth, in a pluralist world, steering is done by all kind of actors, including those who actively resist transformative change. Because of this, steering by government and coalitions of change can achieve little more than a modulation of ongoing dynamics, despite disturbing evidence of a run-away climate, mass extinction, pervasive ecological degradation and steady depletion of resources. A new consciousness of the Anthropocene can evoke fundamental changes in science and the economy if—and only if—they are sufficiently carried by institutional changes and new practices. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’. The Royal Society 2024-01-01 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10645083/ /pubmed/37952629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0270 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Part II: Present - Evolutionary Dynamics of the Anthropocene
Kemp, René
van Lente, Harro
Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution
title Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution
title_full Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution
title_fullStr Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution
title_full_unstemmed Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution
title_short Innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution
title_sort innovation for sustainability: how actors are myopically caught in processes of co-evolution
topic Part II: Present - Evolutionary Dynamics of the Anthropocene
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0270
work_keys_str_mv AT kemprene innovationforsustainabilityhowactorsaremyopicallycaughtinprocessesofcoevolution
AT vanlenteharro innovationforsustainabilityhowactorsaremyopicallycaughtinprocessesofcoevolution