Cargando…
Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators
PURPOSE: Symptoms can negatively impact quality of life for patients with a history of cancer. Digital, electronic health record (EHR)-integrated approaches to routine symptom monitoring accompanied by evidence-based interventions for symptom management have been explored as a scalable way to improv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08114-6 |
_version_ | 1785147392824180736 |
---|---|
author | Minteer, Sarah A. Cheville, Andrea Tesch, Nathan Griffin, Joan M. Austin, Jessica D. Mitchell, Sandra Leppin, Aaron L. Ridgeway, Jennifer L. |
author_facet | Minteer, Sarah A. Cheville, Andrea Tesch, Nathan Griffin, Joan M. Austin, Jessica D. Mitchell, Sandra Leppin, Aaron L. Ridgeway, Jennifer L. |
author_sort | Minteer, Sarah A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Symptoms can negatively impact quality of life for patients with a history of cancer. Digital, electronic health record (EHR)-integrated approaches to routine symptom monitoring accompanied by evidence-based interventions for symptom management have been explored as a scalable way to improve symptom management, particularly between clinic visits. However, little research has evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementing these approaches in real-world settings, particularly during the pre-implementation phase. Pre-implementation assessment is critical for informing the selection and sequencing of implementation strategies and intervention adaptation. Thus, this study sought to understand pre-implementation perceptions of a remote cancer symptom monitoring and management intervention that uses electronic patient-reported outcome measures for symptom assessment. METHODS: We interviewed 20 clinical and administrative stakeholders from 4 geographic regions within an academic medical center and its affiliated health system during the months prior to initiation of a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized pragmatic trial. Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research [CFIR] 2.0. Two study team members reviewed coded transcripts to understand how determinants were relevant in the pre-implementation phase of the trial and prepared analytic memos to identify themes. RESULTS: Findings are summarized in four themes: (1) ability of the intervention to meet patient needs [recipient characteristics], (2) designing with care team needs in mind [innovation design and adaptability], (3) fit of the intervention with existing practice workflows [compatibility], and (4) engaging care teams early [engaging deliverers]. CONCLUSION: Attention to these aspects when planning intervention protocols can promote intervention compatibility with patients, providers, and practices thereby increasing implementation success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10645625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106456252023-11-14 Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators Minteer, Sarah A. Cheville, Andrea Tesch, Nathan Griffin, Joan M. Austin, Jessica D. Mitchell, Sandra Leppin, Aaron L. Ridgeway, Jennifer L. Support Care Cancer Research PURPOSE: Symptoms can negatively impact quality of life for patients with a history of cancer. Digital, electronic health record (EHR)-integrated approaches to routine symptom monitoring accompanied by evidence-based interventions for symptom management have been explored as a scalable way to improve symptom management, particularly between clinic visits. However, little research has evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementing these approaches in real-world settings, particularly during the pre-implementation phase. Pre-implementation assessment is critical for informing the selection and sequencing of implementation strategies and intervention adaptation. Thus, this study sought to understand pre-implementation perceptions of a remote cancer symptom monitoring and management intervention that uses electronic patient-reported outcome measures for symptom assessment. METHODS: We interviewed 20 clinical and administrative stakeholders from 4 geographic regions within an academic medical center and its affiliated health system during the months prior to initiation of a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized pragmatic trial. Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research [CFIR] 2.0. Two study team members reviewed coded transcripts to understand how determinants were relevant in the pre-implementation phase of the trial and prepared analytic memos to identify themes. RESULTS: Findings are summarized in four themes: (1) ability of the intervention to meet patient needs [recipient characteristics], (2) designing with care team needs in mind [innovation design and adaptability], (3) fit of the intervention with existing practice workflows [compatibility], and (4) engaging care teams early [engaging deliverers]. CONCLUSION: Attention to these aspects when planning intervention protocols can promote intervention compatibility with patients, providers, and practices thereby increasing implementation success. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-11-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10645625/ /pubmed/37962699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08114-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Minteer, Sarah A. Cheville, Andrea Tesch, Nathan Griffin, Joan M. Austin, Jessica D. Mitchell, Sandra Leppin, Aaron L. Ridgeway, Jennifer L. Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators |
title | Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators |
title_full | Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators |
title_fullStr | Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators |
title_short | Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators |
title_sort | implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08114-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minteersaraha implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators AT chevilleandrea implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators AT teschnathan implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators AT griffinjoanm implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators AT austinjessicad implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators AT mitchellsandra implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators AT leppinaaronl implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators AT ridgewayjenniferl implementingcancersymptommanagementinterventionsutilizingpatientreportedoutcomesapreimplementationevaluationofbarriersandfacilitators |