Cargando…
Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for acute respiratory failure encompasses veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R). V-V ECMO is primarily used to treat severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by life-t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00563-x |
_version_ | 1785147411767754752 |
---|---|
author | Tonetti, Tommaso Zanella, Alberto Pérez-Torres, David Grasselli, Giacomo Ranieri, V. Marco |
author_facet | Tonetti, Tommaso Zanella, Alberto Pérez-Torres, David Grasselli, Giacomo Ranieri, V. Marco |
author_sort | Tonetti, Tommaso |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for acute respiratory failure encompasses veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R). V-V ECMO is primarily used to treat severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by life-threatening hypoxemia or ventilatory insufficiency with conventional protective settings. It employs an artificial lung with high blood flows, and allows improvement in gas exchange, correction of hypoxemia, and reduction of the workload on the native lung. On the other hand, ECCO(2)R focuses on carbon dioxide removal and ventilatory load reduction (“ultra-protective ventilation”) in moderate ARDS, or in avoiding pump failure in acute exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical indications for V-V ECLS are tailored to individual patients, as there are no absolute contraindications. However, determining the ideal timing for initiating extracorporeal respiratory support remains uncertain. Current ECLS equipment faces issues like size and durability. Innovations include intravascular lung assist devices (ILADs) and pumpless devices, though they come with their own challenges. Efficient gas exchange relies on modern oxygenators using hollow fiber designs, but research is exploring microfluidic technology to improve oxygenator size, thrombogenicity, and blood flow capacity. Coagulation management during V-V ECLS is crucial due to common bleeding and thrombosis complications; indeed, anticoagulation strategies and monitoring systems require improvement, while surface coatings and new materials show promise. Moreover, pharmacokinetics during ECLS significantly impact antibiotic therapy, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring for precise dosing. Managing native lung ventilation during V-V ECMO remains complex, requiring a careful balance between benefits and potential risks for spontaneously breathing patients. Moreover, weaning from V-V ECMO is recognized as an area of relevant uncertainty, requiring further research. In the last decade, the concept of Extracorporeal Organ Support (ECOS) for patients with multiple organ dysfunction has emerged, combining ECLS with other organ support therapies to provide a more holistic approach for critically ill patients. In this review, we aim at providing an in-depth overview of V-V ECMO and ECCO(2)R, addressing various aspects of their use, challenges, and potential future directions in research and development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10645840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106458402023-11-14 Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support Tonetti, Tommaso Zanella, Alberto Pérez-Torres, David Grasselli, Giacomo Ranieri, V. Marco Intensive Care Med Exp Reviews Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for acute respiratory failure encompasses veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R). V-V ECMO is primarily used to treat severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by life-threatening hypoxemia or ventilatory insufficiency with conventional protective settings. It employs an artificial lung with high blood flows, and allows improvement in gas exchange, correction of hypoxemia, and reduction of the workload on the native lung. On the other hand, ECCO(2)R focuses on carbon dioxide removal and ventilatory load reduction (“ultra-protective ventilation”) in moderate ARDS, or in avoiding pump failure in acute exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical indications for V-V ECLS are tailored to individual patients, as there are no absolute contraindications. However, determining the ideal timing for initiating extracorporeal respiratory support remains uncertain. Current ECLS equipment faces issues like size and durability. Innovations include intravascular lung assist devices (ILADs) and pumpless devices, though they come with their own challenges. Efficient gas exchange relies on modern oxygenators using hollow fiber designs, but research is exploring microfluidic technology to improve oxygenator size, thrombogenicity, and blood flow capacity. Coagulation management during V-V ECLS is crucial due to common bleeding and thrombosis complications; indeed, anticoagulation strategies and monitoring systems require improvement, while surface coatings and new materials show promise. Moreover, pharmacokinetics during ECLS significantly impact antibiotic therapy, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring for precise dosing. Managing native lung ventilation during V-V ECMO remains complex, requiring a careful balance between benefits and potential risks for spontaneously breathing patients. Moreover, weaning from V-V ECMO is recognized as an area of relevant uncertainty, requiring further research. In the last decade, the concept of Extracorporeal Organ Support (ECOS) for patients with multiple organ dysfunction has emerged, combining ECLS with other organ support therapies to provide a more holistic approach for critically ill patients. In this review, we aim at providing an in-depth overview of V-V ECMO and ECCO(2)R, addressing various aspects of their use, challenges, and potential future directions in research and development. Springer International Publishing 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10645840/ /pubmed/37962702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00563-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reviews Tonetti, Tommaso Zanella, Alberto Pérez-Torres, David Grasselli, Giacomo Ranieri, V. Marco Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support |
title | Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support |
title_full | Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support |
title_fullStr | Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support |
title_full_unstemmed | Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support |
title_short | Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support |
title_sort | current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00563-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tonettitommaso currentknowledgegapsinextracorporealrespiratorysupport AT zanellaalberto currentknowledgegapsinextracorporealrespiratorysupport AT pereztorresdavid currentknowledgegapsinextracorporealrespiratorysupport AT grasselligiacomo currentknowledgegapsinextracorporealrespiratorysupport AT ranierivmarco currentknowledgegapsinextracorporealrespiratorysupport |