Cargando…

The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation

CT is the principal imaging modality used for the pre-operative 3D planning and assessment of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The image quality offered by CT has a radiation penalty to the patient. Higher than necessary radiation exposure is of particular concern when imaging young patients and women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramesh, Angelika, Di Laura, Anna, Henckel, Johann, Hart, Alister
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2023
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37909704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0141
_version_ 1785134912052920320
author Ramesh, Angelika
Di Laura, Anna
Henckel, Johann
Hart, Alister
author_facet Ramesh, Angelika
Di Laura, Anna
Henckel, Johann
Hart, Alister
author_sort Ramesh, Angelika
collection PubMed
description CT is the principal imaging modality used for the pre-operative 3D planning and assessment of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The image quality offered by CT has a radiation penalty to the patient. Higher than necessary radiation exposure is of particular concern when imaging young patients and women of childbearing age, due to the greater risk of radiation-induced cancer in this group. A harmonised low-dose CT protocol is needed, evidenced by the huge variability in the 17 protocols reviewed. The majority of the protocols were incomplete, leading to uncertainty among radiographers when performing the scans. Only three protocols (20%) were optimised for both ‘field of view’ and image acquisition parameters. 10 protocols (60%) were optimised for ‘field of view’ only. These protocols included imaging of the relevant landmarks in the bony pelvis in addition to the knees – the reference for femoral anteversion. CT parameters, including the scanner kilovoltage (kV), milliamperage–time product (mAs) and slice thickness, must be optimised with a ‘field of view’ that includes the relevant bony landmarks. The recommended kV and mAs values were very wide ranging from 100 to 150 and from 100 to 250, respectively. The large variability that exists amongst the CT protocols illustrates the need for a more consistent low-dose CT protocol for the planning of THA. This must provide an optimal balance between image quality and radiation dose to the patient. Current CT scanners do not allow for measurements of functional pelvic orientation and additional upright imaging modalities are needed to augment them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10646515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106465152023-11-01 The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation Ramesh, Angelika Di Laura, Anna Henckel, Johann Hart, Alister EFORT Open Rev Hip CT is the principal imaging modality used for the pre-operative 3D planning and assessment of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The image quality offered by CT has a radiation penalty to the patient. Higher than necessary radiation exposure is of particular concern when imaging young patients and women of childbearing age, due to the greater risk of radiation-induced cancer in this group. A harmonised low-dose CT protocol is needed, evidenced by the huge variability in the 17 protocols reviewed. The majority of the protocols were incomplete, leading to uncertainty among radiographers when performing the scans. Only three protocols (20%) were optimised for both ‘field of view’ and image acquisition parameters. 10 protocols (60%) were optimised for ‘field of view’ only. These protocols included imaging of the relevant landmarks in the bony pelvis in addition to the knees – the reference for femoral anteversion. CT parameters, including the scanner kilovoltage (kV), milliamperage–time product (mAs) and slice thickness, must be optimised with a ‘field of view’ that includes the relevant bony landmarks. The recommended kV and mAs values were very wide ranging from 100 to 150 and from 100 to 250, respectively. The large variability that exists amongst the CT protocols illustrates the need for a more consistent low-dose CT protocol for the planning of THA. This must provide an optimal balance between image quality and radiation dose to the patient. Current CT scanners do not allow for measurements of functional pelvic orientation and additional upright imaging modalities are needed to augment them. Bioscientifica Ltd 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10646515/ /pubmed/37909704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0141 Text en © the author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Hip
Ramesh, Angelika
Di Laura, Anna
Henckel, Johann
Hart, Alister
The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation
title The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation
title_full The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation
title_fullStr The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation
title_full_unstemmed The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation
title_short The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation
title_sort variability of ct scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37909704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0141
work_keys_str_mv AT rameshangelika thevariabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation
AT dilauraanna thevariabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation
AT henckeljohann thevariabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation
AT hartalister thevariabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation
AT rameshangelika variabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation
AT dilauraanna variabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation
AT henckeljohann variabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation
AT hartalister variabilityofctscanprotocolsfortotalhiparthroplastyacallforharmonisation