Cargando…
Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering
[Image: see text] The ability to maintain and differentiate cells in vitro is critical to many advances in the field of bioengineering. However, on traditional, stiff (E ≈ GPa) culture substrates, cells are subjected to sustained mechanical stress that can lead to phenotypic changes. Such changes ma...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37797187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01007 |
_version_ | 1785147458692579328 |
---|---|
author | Dudaryeva, Oksana Y. Bernhard, Stéphane Tibbitt, Mark W. Labouesse, Céline |
author_facet | Dudaryeva, Oksana Y. Bernhard, Stéphane Tibbitt, Mark W. Labouesse, Céline |
author_sort | Dudaryeva, Oksana Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The ability to maintain and differentiate cells in vitro is critical to many advances in the field of bioengineering. However, on traditional, stiff (E ≈ GPa) culture substrates, cells are subjected to sustained mechanical stress that can lead to phenotypic changes. Such changes may remain even after transferring the cells to another scaffold or engrafting them in vivo and bias the outcomes of the biological investigation or clinical treatment. This persistence—or mechanical memory—was initially observed for sustained myofibroblast activation of pulmonary fibroblasts after culturing them on stiff (E ≈ 100 kPa) substrates. Aspects of mechanical memory have now been described in many in vitro contexts. In this Review, we discuss the stiffness-induced effectors of mechanical memory: structural changes in the cytoskeleton and activity of transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers. We then focus on how mechanical memory impacts cell expansion and tissue regeneration outcomes in bioengineering applications relying on prolonged 2D plastic culture, such as stem cell therapies and disease models. We propose that alternatives to traditional cell culture substrates can be used to mitigate or erase mechanical memory and improve the efficiency of downstream cell-based bioengineering applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10646820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106468202023-11-15 Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering Dudaryeva, Oksana Y. Bernhard, Stéphane Tibbitt, Mark W. Labouesse, Céline ACS Biomater Sci Eng [Image: see text] The ability to maintain and differentiate cells in vitro is critical to many advances in the field of bioengineering. However, on traditional, stiff (E ≈ GPa) culture substrates, cells are subjected to sustained mechanical stress that can lead to phenotypic changes. Such changes may remain even after transferring the cells to another scaffold or engrafting them in vivo and bias the outcomes of the biological investigation or clinical treatment. This persistence—or mechanical memory—was initially observed for sustained myofibroblast activation of pulmonary fibroblasts after culturing them on stiff (E ≈ 100 kPa) substrates. Aspects of mechanical memory have now been described in many in vitro contexts. In this Review, we discuss the stiffness-induced effectors of mechanical memory: structural changes in the cytoskeleton and activity of transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers. We then focus on how mechanical memory impacts cell expansion and tissue regeneration outcomes in bioengineering applications relying on prolonged 2D plastic culture, such as stem cell therapies and disease models. We propose that alternatives to traditional cell culture substrates can be used to mitigate or erase mechanical memory and improve the efficiency of downstream cell-based bioengineering applications. American Chemical Society 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10646820/ /pubmed/37797187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01007 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Dudaryeva, Oksana Y. Bernhard, Stéphane Tibbitt, Mark W. Labouesse, Céline Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering |
title | Implications
of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering |
title_full | Implications
of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering |
title_fullStr | Implications
of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications
of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering |
title_short | Implications
of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering |
title_sort | implications
of cellular mechanical memory in bioengineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37797187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dudaryevaoksanay implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering AT bernhardstephane implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering AT tibbittmarkw implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering AT labouesseceline implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering |