Cargando…

Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering

[Image: see text] The ability to maintain and differentiate cells in vitro is critical to many advances in the field of bioengineering. However, on traditional, stiff (E ≈ GPa) culture substrates, cells are subjected to sustained mechanical stress that can lead to phenotypic changes. Such changes ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudaryeva, Oksana Y., Bernhard, Stéphane, Tibbitt, Mark W., Labouesse, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37797187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01007
_version_ 1785147458692579328
author Dudaryeva, Oksana Y.
Bernhard, Stéphane
Tibbitt, Mark W.
Labouesse, Céline
author_facet Dudaryeva, Oksana Y.
Bernhard, Stéphane
Tibbitt, Mark W.
Labouesse, Céline
author_sort Dudaryeva, Oksana Y.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The ability to maintain and differentiate cells in vitro is critical to many advances in the field of bioengineering. However, on traditional, stiff (E ≈ GPa) culture substrates, cells are subjected to sustained mechanical stress that can lead to phenotypic changes. Such changes may remain even after transferring the cells to another scaffold or engrafting them in vivo and bias the outcomes of the biological investigation or clinical treatment. This persistence—or mechanical memory—was initially observed for sustained myofibroblast activation of pulmonary fibroblasts after culturing them on stiff (E ≈ 100 kPa) substrates. Aspects of mechanical memory have now been described in many in vitro contexts. In this Review, we discuss the stiffness-induced effectors of mechanical memory: structural changes in the cytoskeleton and activity of transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers. We then focus on how mechanical memory impacts cell expansion and tissue regeneration outcomes in bioengineering applications relying on prolonged 2D plastic culture, such as stem cell therapies and disease models. We propose that alternatives to traditional cell culture substrates can be used to mitigate or erase mechanical memory and improve the efficiency of downstream cell-based bioengineering applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10646820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106468202023-11-15 Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering Dudaryeva, Oksana Y. Bernhard, Stéphane Tibbitt, Mark W. Labouesse, Céline ACS Biomater Sci Eng [Image: see text] The ability to maintain and differentiate cells in vitro is critical to many advances in the field of bioengineering. However, on traditional, stiff (E ≈ GPa) culture substrates, cells are subjected to sustained mechanical stress that can lead to phenotypic changes. Such changes may remain even after transferring the cells to another scaffold or engrafting them in vivo and bias the outcomes of the biological investigation or clinical treatment. This persistence—or mechanical memory—was initially observed for sustained myofibroblast activation of pulmonary fibroblasts after culturing them on stiff (E ≈ 100 kPa) substrates. Aspects of mechanical memory have now been described in many in vitro contexts. In this Review, we discuss the stiffness-induced effectors of mechanical memory: structural changes in the cytoskeleton and activity of transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers. We then focus on how mechanical memory impacts cell expansion and tissue regeneration outcomes in bioengineering applications relying on prolonged 2D plastic culture, such as stem cell therapies and disease models. We propose that alternatives to traditional cell culture substrates can be used to mitigate or erase mechanical memory and improve the efficiency of downstream cell-based bioengineering applications. American Chemical Society 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10646820/ /pubmed/37797187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01007 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Dudaryeva, Oksana Y.
Bernhard, Stéphane
Tibbitt, Mark W.
Labouesse, Céline
Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering
title Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering
title_full Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering
title_fullStr Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering
title_short Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering
title_sort implications of cellular mechanical memory in bioengineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37797187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01007
work_keys_str_mv AT dudaryevaoksanay implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering
AT bernhardstephane implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering
AT tibbittmarkw implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering
AT labouesseceline implicationsofcellularmechanicalmemoryinbioengineering