Cargando…

Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries

OBJECTIVES: Research evidence is commonly compiled into expert-informed consensus guidelines intended to consolidate and distribute sports medicine knowledge. Between 2003 and 2018, 27 International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statements were produced. This study explored the policy and practi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fortington, Lauren V, Badenhorst, Marelise, Bolling, Caroline, Derman, Wayne, Emery, Carolyn A, Pasanen, Kati, Schwellnus, Martin, Verhagen, Evert, Finch AO, Caroline F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105984
_version_ 1785147465291268096
author Fortington, Lauren V
Badenhorst, Marelise
Bolling, Caroline
Derman, Wayne
Emery, Carolyn A
Pasanen, Kati
Schwellnus, Martin
Verhagen, Evert
Finch AO, Caroline F
author_facet Fortington, Lauren V
Badenhorst, Marelise
Bolling, Caroline
Derman, Wayne
Emery, Carolyn A
Pasanen, Kati
Schwellnus, Martin
Verhagen, Evert
Finch AO, Caroline F
author_sort Fortington, Lauren V
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Research evidence is commonly compiled into expert-informed consensus guidelines intended to consolidate and distribute sports medicine knowledge. Between 2003 and 2018, 27 International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statements were produced. This study explored the policy and practice impact of the IOC Statements on athlete health and medical team management in two economically and contextually diverse countries. METHODS: A qualitative case study design was adopted. Fourteen face-to-face interviews were conducted with purposively selected interviewees, seven participants from Australia (higher economic equality) and seven from South Africa (lower economic equality), representing their national medical commissions (doctors and physiotherapists of Olympic, Paralympic and Youth teams). A framework method was used to analyse interview transcripts and identify key themes. RESULTS: Differences across resource settings were found, particularly in the perceived usefulness of the IOC Statements and their accessibility. Both settings were unsure about the purpose of the IOC Statements and their intended audience. However, both valued the existence of evidence-informed guidelines. In the Australian setting, there was less reliance on the resources developed by the IOC, preferring to use locally contextualised documents that are readily available. CONCLUSION: The IOC Statements are valuable evidence-informed resources that support translation of knowledge into clinical sports medicine practice. However, to be fully effective, they must be perceived as useful and relevant and should reach their target audiences with ready access. This study showed different contexts require different resources, levels of support and dissemination approaches. Future development and dissemination of IOC Statements should consider the perspectives and the diversity of contexts they are intended for.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10646857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106468572023-11-15 Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries Fortington, Lauren V Badenhorst, Marelise Bolling, Caroline Derman, Wayne Emery, Carolyn A Pasanen, Kati Schwellnus, Martin Verhagen, Evert Finch AO, Caroline F Br J Sports Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: Research evidence is commonly compiled into expert-informed consensus guidelines intended to consolidate and distribute sports medicine knowledge. Between 2003 and 2018, 27 International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statements were produced. This study explored the policy and practice impact of the IOC Statements on athlete health and medical team management in two economically and contextually diverse countries. METHODS: A qualitative case study design was adopted. Fourteen face-to-face interviews were conducted with purposively selected interviewees, seven participants from Australia (higher economic equality) and seven from South Africa (lower economic equality), representing their national medical commissions (doctors and physiotherapists of Olympic, Paralympic and Youth teams). A framework method was used to analyse interview transcripts and identify key themes. RESULTS: Differences across resource settings were found, particularly in the perceived usefulness of the IOC Statements and their accessibility. Both settings were unsure about the purpose of the IOC Statements and their intended audience. However, both valued the existence of evidence-informed guidelines. In the Australian setting, there was less reliance on the resources developed by the IOC, preferring to use locally contextualised documents that are readily available. CONCLUSION: The IOC Statements are valuable evidence-informed resources that support translation of knowledge into clinical sports medicine practice. However, to be fully effective, they must be perceived as useful and relevant and should reach their target audiences with ready access. This study showed different contexts require different resources, levels of support and dissemination approaches. Future development and dissemination of IOC Statements should consider the perspectives and the diversity of contexts they are intended for. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10646857/ /pubmed/36725283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105984 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Fortington, Lauren V
Badenhorst, Marelise
Bolling, Caroline
Derman, Wayne
Emery, Carolyn A
Pasanen, Kati
Schwellnus, Martin
Verhagen, Evert
Finch AO, Caroline F
Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries
title Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries
title_full Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries
title_fullStr Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries
title_full_unstemmed Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries
title_short Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries
title_sort are we levelling the playing field? a qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the ioc consensus statements in two countries
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105984
work_keys_str_mv AT fortingtonlaurenv arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT badenhorstmarelise arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT bollingcaroline arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT dermanwayne arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT emerycarolyna arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT pasanenkati arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT schwellnusmartin arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT verhagenevert arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries
AT finchaocarolinef arewelevellingtheplayingfieldaqualitativecasestudyoftheawarenessuptakeandrelevanceoftheiocconsensusstatementsintwocountries