Cargando…

Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups

OBJECTIVES: The severity of skin involvement in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) depends on stage of disease and differs between anti-RNA-polymerase III (ARA) and anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA) subsets. We have investigated cellular differences in well-characterised dcSSc patients com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard, Xu, Shiwen, Attah, Moustafa, Ong, Voon H, Buckley, Christopher Dominic, Denton, Christopher P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37580109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-224184
_version_ 1785147466396467200
author Clark, Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard
Xu, Shiwen
Attah, Moustafa
Ong, Voon H
Buckley, Christopher Dominic
Denton, Christopher P
author_facet Clark, Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard
Xu, Shiwen
Attah, Moustafa
Ong, Voon H
Buckley, Christopher Dominic
Denton, Christopher P
author_sort Clark, Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The severity of skin involvement in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) depends on stage of disease and differs between anti-RNA-polymerase III (ARA) and anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA) subsets. We have investigated cellular differences in well-characterised dcSSc patients compared with healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: We performed single-cell RNA sequencing on 4 mm skin biopsy samples from 12 patients with dcSSc and HCs (n=3) using droplet-based sequencing (10× genomics). Patients were well characterised by stage (>5 or <5 years disease duration) and autoantibody (ATA+ or ARA+). Analysis of whole skin cell subsets and fibroblast subpopulations across stage and ANA subgroup were used to interpret potential cellular differences anchored by these subgroups. RESULTS: Fifteen forearm skin biopsies were analysed. There was a clear separation of SSc samples, by disease, stage and antibody, for all cells and fibroblast subclusters. Further analysis revealed differing cell cluster gene expression profiles between ATA+ and ARA+ patients. Cell-to-cell interaction suggest differing interactions between early and late stages of disease and autoantibody. TGFβ response was mainly seen in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in early ATA+dcSSc skin samples, whereas in early ARA+dcSSc patient skin samples, the responding cells were endothelial, reflect broader differences between clinical phenotypes and distinct skin score trajectories across autoantibody subgroups of dcSSc. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified cellular differences between the two main autoantibody subsets in dcSSc (ARA+ and ATA+). These differences reinforce the importance of considering autoantibody and stage of disease in management and trial design in SSc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10646865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106468652023-11-15 Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups Clark, Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard Xu, Shiwen Attah, Moustafa Ong, Voon H Buckley, Christopher Dominic Denton, Christopher P Ann Rheum Dis Systemic Sclerosis OBJECTIVES: The severity of skin involvement in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) depends on stage of disease and differs between anti-RNA-polymerase III (ARA) and anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA) subsets. We have investigated cellular differences in well-characterised dcSSc patients compared with healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: We performed single-cell RNA sequencing on 4 mm skin biopsy samples from 12 patients with dcSSc and HCs (n=3) using droplet-based sequencing (10× genomics). Patients were well characterised by stage (>5 or <5 years disease duration) and autoantibody (ATA+ or ARA+). Analysis of whole skin cell subsets and fibroblast subpopulations across stage and ANA subgroup were used to interpret potential cellular differences anchored by these subgroups. RESULTS: Fifteen forearm skin biopsies were analysed. There was a clear separation of SSc samples, by disease, stage and antibody, for all cells and fibroblast subclusters. Further analysis revealed differing cell cluster gene expression profiles between ATA+ and ARA+ patients. Cell-to-cell interaction suggest differing interactions between early and late stages of disease and autoantibody. TGFβ response was mainly seen in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in early ATA+dcSSc skin samples, whereas in early ARA+dcSSc patient skin samples, the responding cells were endothelial, reflect broader differences between clinical phenotypes and distinct skin score trajectories across autoantibody subgroups of dcSSc. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified cellular differences between the two main autoantibody subsets in dcSSc (ARA+ and ATA+). These differences reinforce the importance of considering autoantibody and stage of disease in management and trial design in SSc. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-12 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10646865/ /pubmed/37580109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-224184 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systemic Sclerosis
Clark, Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard
Xu, Shiwen
Attah, Moustafa
Ong, Voon H
Buckley, Christopher Dominic
Denton, Christopher P
Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups
title Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups
title_full Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups
title_fullStr Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups
title_full_unstemmed Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups
title_short Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups
title_sort single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups
topic Systemic Sclerosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37580109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-224184
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkkristinaelizabethneergaard singlecellanalysisrevealskeydifferencesbetweenearlystageandlatestagesystemicsclerosisskinacrossautoantibodysubgroups
AT xushiwen singlecellanalysisrevealskeydifferencesbetweenearlystageandlatestagesystemicsclerosisskinacrossautoantibodysubgroups
AT attahmoustafa singlecellanalysisrevealskeydifferencesbetweenearlystageandlatestagesystemicsclerosisskinacrossautoantibodysubgroups
AT ongvoonh singlecellanalysisrevealskeydifferencesbetweenearlystageandlatestagesystemicsclerosisskinacrossautoantibodysubgroups
AT buckleychristopherdominic singlecellanalysisrevealskeydifferencesbetweenearlystageandlatestagesystemicsclerosisskinacrossautoantibodysubgroups
AT dentonchristopherp singlecellanalysisrevealskeydifferencesbetweenearlystageandlatestagesystemicsclerosisskinacrossautoantibodysubgroups