Cargando…
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK
BACKGROUND: The provision of neonatal care is variable and commonly lacks adequate evidence base; strategic development of methodologically robust clinical trials is needed to improve outcomes and maximise research resources. Historically, neonatal research topics have been selected by researchers;...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-325504 |
_version_ | 1785147468270272512 |
---|---|
author | Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine Carroll, Will Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James William Harrison Gale, Chris |
author_facet | Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine Carroll, Will Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James William Harrison Gale, Chris |
author_sort | Evans, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The provision of neonatal care is variable and commonly lacks adequate evidence base; strategic development of methodologically robust clinical trials is needed to improve outcomes and maximise research resources. Historically, neonatal research topics have been selected by researchers; prioritisation processes involving wider stakeholder groups have generally identified research themes rather than specific questions amenable to interventional trials. OBJECTIVE: To involve stakeholders including parents, healthcare professionals and researchers to identify and prioritise research questions suitable for answering in neonatal interventional trials in the UK. DESIGN: Research questions were submitted by stakeholders in population, intervention, comparison, outcome format through an online platform. Questions were reviewed by a representative steering group; duplicates and previously answered questions were removed. Eligible questions were entered into a three-round online Delphi survey for prioritisation by all stakeholder groups. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eight respondents submitted research questions for consideration; 144 participants completed round one of the Delphi survey, 106 completed all three rounds. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-five research questions were submitted and after steering group review, 186 entered into the Delphi survey. The top five ranked research questions related to breast milk fortification, intact cord resuscitation, timing of surgical intervention in necrotising enterocolitis, therapeutic hypothermia for mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and non-invasive respiratory support. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified and prioritised research questions suitable for practice-changing interventional trials in neonatal medicine in the UK at the present time. Trials targeting these uncertainties have potential to reduce research waste and improve neonatal care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10646876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106468762023-11-15 National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine Carroll, Will Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James William Harrison Gale, Chris Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Original Research BACKGROUND: The provision of neonatal care is variable and commonly lacks adequate evidence base; strategic development of methodologically robust clinical trials is needed to improve outcomes and maximise research resources. Historically, neonatal research topics have been selected by researchers; prioritisation processes involving wider stakeholder groups have generally identified research themes rather than specific questions amenable to interventional trials. OBJECTIVE: To involve stakeholders including parents, healthcare professionals and researchers to identify and prioritise research questions suitable for answering in neonatal interventional trials in the UK. DESIGN: Research questions were submitted by stakeholders in population, intervention, comparison, outcome format through an online platform. Questions were reviewed by a representative steering group; duplicates and previously answered questions were removed. Eligible questions were entered into a three-round online Delphi survey for prioritisation by all stakeholder groups. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eight respondents submitted research questions for consideration; 144 participants completed round one of the Delphi survey, 106 completed all three rounds. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-five research questions were submitted and after steering group review, 186 entered into the Delphi survey. The top five ranked research questions related to breast milk fortification, intact cord resuscitation, timing of surgical intervention in necrotising enterocolitis, therapeutic hypothermia for mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and non-invasive respiratory support. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified and prioritised research questions suitable for practice-changing interventional trials in neonatal medicine in the UK at the present time. Trials targeting these uncertainties have potential to reduce research waste and improve neonatal care. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10646876/ /pubmed/37094919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-325504 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine Carroll, Will Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James William Harrison Gale, Chris National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK |
title | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK |
title_full | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK |
title_fullStr | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK |
title_short | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK |
title_sort | national priority setting partnership using a delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the uk |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-325504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evanskatie nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT battersbycheryl nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT boardmanjamesp nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT boyleelaine nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT carrollwill nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT dinwiddykate nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT dorlingjon nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT gallagherkatie nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT hardypollyanna nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT johnstonemma nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT mactierhelen nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT marcroftclaire nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT webbejameswilliamharrison nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk AT galechris nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheuk |