Cargando…

Association of intravenous thrombolysis and pre-interventional reperfusion: a post hoc analysis of the SWIFT DIRECT trial

BACKGROUND: A potential benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is pre-interventional reperfusion. Currently, there are few data on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion in patients randomized to IVT or no IVT before MT. METHODS: SWIFT DIRECT (Solitai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mujanovic, Adnan, Eker, Omer, Marnat, Gaultier, Strbian, Daniel, Ijäs, Petra, Préterre, Cécile, Triquenot, Aude, Albucher, Jean François, Gauberti, Maxime, Weisenburger-Lile, David, Ernst, Marielle, Nikoubashman, Omid, Mpotsaris, Anastasios, Gory, Benjamin, Tuan Hua, Vi, Ribo, Marc, Liebeskind, David S, Dobrocky, Tomas, Meinel, Thomas R, Buetikofer, Lukas, Gralla, Jan, Fischer, Urs, Kaesmacher, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2022-019585
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: A potential benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is pre-interventional reperfusion. Currently, there are few data on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion in patients randomized to IVT or no IVT before MT. METHODS: SWIFT DIRECT (Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous t-PA vs DIRECT Solitaire Stent-retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke) was a randomized controlled trial including acute ischemic stroke IVT eligible patients being directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center, with allocation to IVT with MT versus MT alone. The primary endpoint of this analysis was the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion, defined as a pre-interventional expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of ≥2a. The effect of IVT and potential treatment effect heterogeneity were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 396 patients, pre-interventional reperfusion occurred in 20 (10.0%) patients randomized to IVT with MT, and in 7 (3.6%) patients randomized to MT alone. Receiving IVT favored the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion (adjusted OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.87). There was no IVT treatment effect heterogeneity on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion with different strata of Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time (p for interaction=0.33), although the effect tended to be stronger in patients with a Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time >28 min (adjusted OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 18.68). There were no significant differences in rates of functional outcomes between patients with and without pre-interventional reperfusion. CONCLUSION: Even for patients with proximal large vessel occlusions and direct access to MT, IVT resulted in an absolute increase of 6% in rates of pre-interventional reperfusion. The influence of time strata on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion should be studied further in an individual patient data meta-analysis of comparable trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03192332.