Cargando…
Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of starch requires recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that produce raw starch-degrading enzymes and ferment the resultant sugars to ethanol in a single step. In this study, the native S. cerevisiae COX4 and RPS25A promoter-proximal introns were evaluated fo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foad047 |
_version_ | 1785135008448512000 |
---|---|
author | Schwerdtfeger, Kirstie S Myburgh, Marthinus W van Zyl, Willem H Viljoen-Bloom, Marinda |
author_facet | Schwerdtfeger, Kirstie S Myburgh, Marthinus W van Zyl, Willem H Viljoen-Bloom, Marinda |
author_sort | Schwerdtfeger, Kirstie S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of starch requires recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that produce raw starch-degrading enzymes and ferment the resultant sugars to ethanol in a single step. In this study, the native S. cerevisiae COX4 and RPS25A promoter-proximal introns were evaluated for enhanced expression of amylase genes (ateA, temA or temG_Opt) under the control of an S. cerevisiae promoter (ENO1(P), TEF1(P), TDH3(P), or HXT7(P)). The results showed that different promoters and promoter-intron combinations differentially affected recombinant amylase production: ENO1(P)-COX4(i) and TDH3(P)-RPS25A(i) were the best promoters for AteA, followed closely by HXT7(P). The latter was also the best promoter for TemA and TemG production, followed closely by TDH3(P)-RPS25A(i) for both these enzymes. Introducing promoter-proximal introns increased amylase activity up to 62% in Y294[ENO-COX-AteA] and Y294[TDH3-RPS-TemA], a significant improvement relative to the intron-less promoters. Strains co-expressing both an α-amylase and glucoamylase genes yielded up to 56 g/L ethanol from 20% w/v raw starch, with a higher carbon conversion observed with strains co-expressing TDH3(P)-RPS25A(i)-temG_Opt than HXT7(P)-temG_Opt. The study showed that promoter-proximal introns can enhance amylase activity in S. cerevisiae and suggest that these alternative cassettes may also be considered for expression in more efficient ethanol-producing industrial yeast strains for raw starch CBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10647015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106470152023-10-27 Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Schwerdtfeger, Kirstie S Myburgh, Marthinus W van Zyl, Willem H Viljoen-Bloom, Marinda FEMS Yeast Res Research Article Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of starch requires recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that produce raw starch-degrading enzymes and ferment the resultant sugars to ethanol in a single step. In this study, the native S. cerevisiae COX4 and RPS25A promoter-proximal introns were evaluated for enhanced expression of amylase genes (ateA, temA or temG_Opt) under the control of an S. cerevisiae promoter (ENO1(P), TEF1(P), TDH3(P), or HXT7(P)). The results showed that different promoters and promoter-intron combinations differentially affected recombinant amylase production: ENO1(P)-COX4(i) and TDH3(P)-RPS25A(i) were the best promoters for AteA, followed closely by HXT7(P). The latter was also the best promoter for TemA and TemG production, followed closely by TDH3(P)-RPS25A(i) for both these enzymes. Introducing promoter-proximal introns increased amylase activity up to 62% in Y294[ENO-COX-AteA] and Y294[TDH3-RPS-TemA], a significant improvement relative to the intron-less promoters. Strains co-expressing both an α-amylase and glucoamylase genes yielded up to 56 g/L ethanol from 20% w/v raw starch, with a higher carbon conversion observed with strains co-expressing TDH3(P)-RPS25A(i)-temG_Opt than HXT7(P)-temG_Opt. The study showed that promoter-proximal introns can enhance amylase activity in S. cerevisiae and suggest that these alternative cassettes may also be considered for expression in more efficient ethanol-producing industrial yeast strains for raw starch CBP. Oxford University Press 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10647015/ /pubmed/37891015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foad047 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schwerdtfeger, Kirstie S Myburgh, Marthinus W van Zyl, Willem H Viljoen-Bloom, Marinda Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title | Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title_full | Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title_fullStr | Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title_short | Promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title_sort | promoter-proximal introns impact recombinant amylase expression in saccharomyces cerevisiae |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foad047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwerdtfegerkirsties promoterproximalintronsimpactrecombinantamylaseexpressioninsaccharomycescerevisiae AT myburghmarthinusw promoterproximalintronsimpactrecombinantamylaseexpressioninsaccharomycescerevisiae AT vanzylwillemh promoterproximalintronsimpactrecombinantamylaseexpressioninsaccharomycescerevisiae AT viljoenbloommarinda promoterproximalintronsimpactrecombinantamylaseexpressioninsaccharomycescerevisiae |