Cargando…

Predicting micropapillary or solid pattern of lung adenocarcinoma with CT-based radiomics, conventional radiographic and clinical features

BACKGROUND: To build prediction models with radiomics features, clinical/conventional radiographic signs and combined scores for the discrimination of micropapillary or solid subtypes (high-risk subtypes) of lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 351 patients with and withou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhe, Zhang, Ning, Liu, Junhong, Liu, Junfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02592-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To build prediction models with radiomics features, clinical/conventional radiographic signs and combined scores for the discrimination of micropapillary or solid subtypes (high-risk subtypes) of lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 351 patients with and without high-risk subtypes. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression with cross-validation was performed to determine the optimal features of radiomics model. Missing clinical data were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Chain Equations (MICE). Clinical model with radiographic signs was built and scores of both models were integrated to establish combined model. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, area under ROC curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were plotted to evaluate the model performance and clinical application. RESULTS: Stratified splitting allocated 246 patients into training set. MICE for missing values obtained complete and unbiased data for the following analysis. Ninety radiomic features and four clinical/conventional radiographic signs were used to predict the high-risk subtypes. The radiomic model, clinical model and combined model achieved AUCs of 0.863 (95%CI: 0.817–0.909), 0.771 (95%CI: 0.713–0.713) and 0.872 (95%CI: 0.829–0.916) in the training set, and 0.849 (95%CI: 0.774–0.924), 0.778 (95%CI: 0.687–0.868) and 0.853 (95%CI: 0.782–0.925) in the test set. Decision curve showed that the radiomic and combined models were more clinically useful when the threshold reached 37.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics features could facilitate the prediction of subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. A simple combination of radiomics and clinical scores generated a robust model with high performance for the discrimination of micropapillary or solid subtype of lung adenocarcinoma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-023-02592-2.