Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment

BACKGROUND: In dentistry, nosocomial infection poses a great challenge to clinicians. The microbial contamination of water in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) is ubiquitous. Such infected DUWLs can transmit oral microbes in the form of aerosols. Previous studies have suggested treating DUWLs with vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Rutuja, Hindlekar, Ajit, Jadhav, Ganesh R., Mittal, Priya, Humnabad, Vamshi, Di Blasio, Marco, Cicciù, Marco, Minervini, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03585-9
_version_ 1785147519579193344
author Patil, Rutuja
Hindlekar, Ajit
Jadhav, Ganesh R.
Mittal, Priya
Humnabad, Vamshi
Di Blasio, Marco
Cicciù, Marco
Minervini, Giuseppe
author_facet Patil, Rutuja
Hindlekar, Ajit
Jadhav, Ganesh R.
Mittal, Priya
Humnabad, Vamshi
Di Blasio, Marco
Cicciù, Marco
Minervini, Giuseppe
author_sort Patil, Rutuja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In dentistry, nosocomial infection poses a great challenge to clinicians. The microbial contamination of water in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) is ubiquitous. Such infected DUWLs can transmit oral microbes in the form of aerosols. Previous studies have suggested treating DUWLs with various disinfectants to reduce cross-contamination. The literature lacks a comparative evaluation of the effect of the use of 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 0.1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in DUWLs on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental procedures. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of NaOCl and CHX in DUWLs on aerosolized bacteria generated during restorative and endodontic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 132 patients were equally divided into three groups (n = 44 in each group) according to the content of DUWL as follows. Group I—0.1% NaOCl Group II—0.2% CHX Group III—distilled water (Positive control) One-way ANOVA was performed and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for intergroup comparison. RESULTS: For the restorative procedure, inter-group comparison of mean colony-forming units (CFU) scores showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p - .001) with the score of group 3 higher than group 2 followed by group 1. For the endodontics, an inter-group comparison of CFU scores showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p - .003) with the mean score in group 1 being the lowest and group 3 being the highest. CONCLUSION: The addition of NaOCl or CHX in DUWLs shows an effective reduction in aerosolized bacteria compared to distilled water.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10647182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106471822023-11-14 Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment Patil, Rutuja Hindlekar, Ajit Jadhav, Ganesh R. Mittal, Priya Humnabad, Vamshi Di Blasio, Marco Cicciù, Marco Minervini, Giuseppe BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: In dentistry, nosocomial infection poses a great challenge to clinicians. The microbial contamination of water in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) is ubiquitous. Such infected DUWLs can transmit oral microbes in the form of aerosols. Previous studies have suggested treating DUWLs with various disinfectants to reduce cross-contamination. The literature lacks a comparative evaluation of the effect of the use of 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 0.1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in DUWLs on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental procedures. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of NaOCl and CHX in DUWLs on aerosolized bacteria generated during restorative and endodontic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 132 patients were equally divided into three groups (n = 44 in each group) according to the content of DUWL as follows. Group I—0.1% NaOCl Group II—0.2% CHX Group III—distilled water (Positive control) One-way ANOVA was performed and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for intergroup comparison. RESULTS: For the restorative procedure, inter-group comparison of mean colony-forming units (CFU) scores showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p - .001) with the score of group 3 higher than group 2 followed by group 1. For the endodontics, an inter-group comparison of CFU scores showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p - .003) with the mean score in group 1 being the lowest and group 3 being the highest. CONCLUSION: The addition of NaOCl or CHX in DUWLs shows an effective reduction in aerosolized bacteria compared to distilled water. BioMed Central 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10647182/ /pubmed/37964280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03585-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Patil, Rutuja
Hindlekar, Ajit
Jadhav, Ganesh R.
Mittal, Priya
Humnabad, Vamshi
Di Blasio, Marco
Cicciù, Marco
Minervini, Giuseppe
Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment
title Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment
title_full Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment
title_short Comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment
title_sort comparative evaluation of effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in dental unit waterline on aerosolized bacteria generated during dental treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03585-9
work_keys_str_mv AT patilrutuja comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment
AT hindlekarajit comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment
AT jadhavganeshr comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment
AT mittalpriya comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment
AT humnabadvamshi comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment
AT diblasiomarco comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment
AT cicciumarco comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment
AT minervinigiuseppe comparativeevaluationofeffectofsodiumhypochloriteandchlorhexidineindentalunitwaterlineonaerosolizedbacteriageneratedduringdentaltreatment