Cargando…

How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review

Methods for retracting the anterior teeth are divided into frictional methods and non-frictional methods. However, evidence regarding the superiority of one technique over the other is still lacking in the available literature. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kheshfeh, Mohammad Naem, Hajeer, Mohammad Younis, Al Hinnawi, Mhd. Firas, Awawdeh, Mohammed Adel, Aljhani, Ali S., Alhazmi, Nora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216757
_version_ 1785135057996873728
author Kheshfeh, Mohammad Naem
Hajeer, Mohammad Younis
Al Hinnawi, Mhd. Firas
Awawdeh, Mohammed Adel
Aljhani, Ali S.
Alhazmi, Nora
author_facet Kheshfeh, Mohammad Naem
Hajeer, Mohammad Younis
Al Hinnawi, Mhd. Firas
Awawdeh, Mohammed Adel
Aljhani, Ali S.
Alhazmi, Nora
author_sort Kheshfeh, Mohammad Naem
collection PubMed
description Methods for retracting the anterior teeth are divided into frictional methods and non-frictional methods. However, evidence regarding the superiority of one technique over the other is still lacking in the available literature. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of frictional methods of anterior teeth retraction compared to the non-frictional ones. The extracted data included the mechanism of application of the retraction force and its intensity, the observation period, follow-up records, and outcome measures. Ten studies were included in this review; the results did not favor a specific technique regarding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and loss of anchorage during canine retraction, although a preference was shown for the sliding technique in the rate of en-masse retraction (0.74 versus 0.39 mm/month) and the anchorage control during the retraction of the incisors (0.5 versus 0.1 mm/month). The control of the incisor’s torque during the en-masse retraction was higher when frictionless techniques were used (−12° versus −7°). Regarding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement, the non-frictional technique is characterized by a high sensitivity to the quality of the design, and the sliding technique was generally effective. As for controlling the torque of the incisors, the preference is for the non-frictional technique. Overall, there is a need to conduct more studies with an appropriate design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10647228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106472282023-10-25 How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review Kheshfeh, Mohammad Naem Hajeer, Mohammad Younis Al Hinnawi, Mhd. Firas Awawdeh, Mohammed Adel Aljhani, Ali S. Alhazmi, Nora J Clin Med Systematic Review Methods for retracting the anterior teeth are divided into frictional methods and non-frictional methods. However, evidence regarding the superiority of one technique over the other is still lacking in the available literature. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of frictional methods of anterior teeth retraction compared to the non-frictional ones. The extracted data included the mechanism of application of the retraction force and its intensity, the observation period, follow-up records, and outcome measures. Ten studies were included in this review; the results did not favor a specific technique regarding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and loss of anchorage during canine retraction, although a preference was shown for the sliding technique in the rate of en-masse retraction (0.74 versus 0.39 mm/month) and the anchorage control during the retraction of the incisors (0.5 versus 0.1 mm/month). The control of the incisor’s torque during the en-masse retraction was higher when frictionless techniques were used (−12° versus −7°). Regarding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement, the non-frictional technique is characterized by a high sensitivity to the quality of the design, and the sliding technique was generally effective. As for controlling the torque of the incisors, the preference is for the non-frictional technique. Overall, there is a need to conduct more studies with an appropriate design. MDPI 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10647228/ /pubmed/37959222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216757 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kheshfeh, Mohammad Naem
Hajeer, Mohammad Younis
Al Hinnawi, Mhd. Firas
Awawdeh, Mohammed Adel
Aljhani, Ali S.
Alhazmi, Nora
How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review
title How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review
title_full How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review
title_short How Effective Are Non-Frictional Techniques Compared to Sliding Techniques in the Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth When Using Buccal Fixed-Appliance Therapy? A Systematic Review
title_sort how effective are non-frictional techniques compared to sliding techniques in the retraction of upper anterior teeth when using buccal fixed-appliance therapy? a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216757
work_keys_str_mv AT kheshfehmohammadnaem howeffectivearenonfrictionaltechniquescomparedtoslidingtechniquesintheretractionofupperanteriorteethwhenusingbuccalfixedappliancetherapyasystematicreview
AT hajeermohammadyounis howeffectivearenonfrictionaltechniquescomparedtoslidingtechniquesintheretractionofupperanteriorteethwhenusingbuccalfixedappliancetherapyasystematicreview
AT alhinnawimhdfiras howeffectivearenonfrictionaltechniquescomparedtoslidingtechniquesintheretractionofupperanteriorteethwhenusingbuccalfixedappliancetherapyasystematicreview
AT awawdehmohammedadel howeffectivearenonfrictionaltechniquescomparedtoslidingtechniquesintheretractionofupperanteriorteethwhenusingbuccalfixedappliancetherapyasystematicreview
AT aljhanialis howeffectivearenonfrictionaltechniquescomparedtoslidingtechniquesintheretractionofupperanteriorteethwhenusingbuccalfixedappliancetherapyasystematicreview
AT alhazminora howeffectivearenonfrictionaltechniquescomparedtoslidingtechniquesintheretractionofupperanteriorteethwhenusingbuccalfixedappliancetherapyasystematicreview