Cargando…

Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of global disability. Several lines of evidence implicate the dopamine system in its pathophysiology. However, the magnitude and consistency of the findings are unknown. We address this by systematically reviewing in vivo imaging evidenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mizuno, Yuya, Ashok, Abhishekh Hulegar, Bhat, Bhagyashree Bhaskar, Jauhar, Sameer, Howes, Oliver D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37811803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02698811231200881
_version_ 1785147525207949312
author Mizuno, Yuya
Ashok, Abhishekh Hulegar
Bhat, Bhagyashree Bhaskar
Jauhar, Sameer
Howes, Oliver D
author_facet Mizuno, Yuya
Ashok, Abhishekh Hulegar
Bhat, Bhagyashree Bhaskar
Jauhar, Sameer
Howes, Oliver D
author_sort Mizuno, Yuya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of global disability. Several lines of evidence implicate the dopamine system in its pathophysiology. However, the magnitude and consistency of the findings are unknown. We address this by systematically reviewing in vivo imaging evidence for dopamine measures in MDD and meta-analysing these where there are sufficient studies. METHODS: Studies investigating the dopaminergic system using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography in MDD and a control group were included. Demographic, clinical and imaging measures were extracted from each study, and meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We identified 43 studies including 662 patients and 801 controls. Meta-analysis of 38 studies showed no difference in mean or mean variability of striatal D(2/3) receptor availability (g = 0.06, p = 0.620), or combined dopamine synthesis and release capacity (g = 0.19, p = 0.309). Dopamine transporter (DAT) availability was lower in the MDD group in studies using DAT selective tracers (g = −0.56, p = 0.006), but not when tracers with an affinity for serotonin transporters were included (g = −0.21, p = 0.420). Subgroup analysis showed greater dopamine release (g = 0.49, p = 0.030), but no difference in dopamine synthesis capacity (g = −0.21, p = 0.434) in the MDD group. Striatal D(1) receptor availability was lower in patients with MDD in two studies. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates striatal DAT availability is lower, but D(2/3) receptor availability is not altered in people with MDD compared to healthy controls. There may be greater dopamine release and lower striatal D(1) receptors in MDD, although further studies are warranted. We discuss factors associated with these findings, discrepancies with preclinical literature and implications for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10647912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106479122023-11-15 Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies Mizuno, Yuya Ashok, Abhishekh Hulegar Bhat, Bhagyashree Bhaskar Jauhar, Sameer Howes, Oliver D J Psychopharmacol Original Papers BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of global disability. Several lines of evidence implicate the dopamine system in its pathophysiology. However, the magnitude and consistency of the findings are unknown. We address this by systematically reviewing in vivo imaging evidence for dopamine measures in MDD and meta-analysing these where there are sufficient studies. METHODS: Studies investigating the dopaminergic system using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography in MDD and a control group were included. Demographic, clinical and imaging measures were extracted from each study, and meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We identified 43 studies including 662 patients and 801 controls. Meta-analysis of 38 studies showed no difference in mean or mean variability of striatal D(2/3) receptor availability (g = 0.06, p = 0.620), or combined dopamine synthesis and release capacity (g = 0.19, p = 0.309). Dopamine transporter (DAT) availability was lower in the MDD group in studies using DAT selective tracers (g = −0.56, p = 0.006), but not when tracers with an affinity for serotonin transporters were included (g = −0.21, p = 0.420). Subgroup analysis showed greater dopamine release (g = 0.49, p = 0.030), but no difference in dopamine synthesis capacity (g = −0.21, p = 0.434) in the MDD group. Striatal D(1) receptor availability was lower in patients with MDD in two studies. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates striatal DAT availability is lower, but D(2/3) receptor availability is not altered in people with MDD compared to healthy controls. There may be greater dopamine release and lower striatal D(1) receptors in MDD, although further studies are warranted. We discuss factors associated with these findings, discrepancies with preclinical literature and implications for future research. SAGE Publications 2023-10-09 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10647912/ /pubmed/37811803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02698811231200881 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Papers
Mizuno, Yuya
Ashok, Abhishekh Hulegar
Bhat, Bhagyashree Bhaskar
Jauhar, Sameer
Howes, Oliver D
Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies
title Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies
title_full Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies
title_fullStr Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies
title_full_unstemmed Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies
title_short Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies
title_sort dopamine in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37811803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02698811231200881
work_keys_str_mv AT mizunoyuya dopamineinmajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvivoimagingstudies
AT ashokabhishekhhulegar dopamineinmajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvivoimagingstudies
AT bhatbhagyashreebhaskar dopamineinmajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvivoimagingstudies
AT jauharsameer dopamineinmajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvivoimagingstudies
AT howesoliverd dopamineinmajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvivoimagingstudies