Cargando…

The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of using flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams and the aperture shape controller (ASC) on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 24 head and neck (H&N) and 24 prostate with pelvic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hui, Cheukkai B., Pourmoghaddas, Amir, Mutaf, Yildirim D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14108
_version_ 1785135230261133312
author Hui, Cheukkai B.
Pourmoghaddas, Amir
Mutaf, Yildirim D.
author_facet Hui, Cheukkai B.
Pourmoghaddas, Amir
Mutaf, Yildirim D.
author_sort Hui, Cheukkai B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of using flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams and the aperture shape controller (ASC) on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 24 head and neck (H&N) and 24 prostate with pelvic nodes treatment plans were used in this study. Each plan was reoptimized using the original clinical objectives with both flattened and FFF beams, as well as six different ASC settings. The dosimetric qualities of each plan cohort were evaluated using commonly used dose‐volume histogram values, and plan complexities were assessed through metrics including monitor unit (MU)/Dose, change in gantry speed, multileaf collimator (MLC) speed, the edge area ratio metric (EM), and the equivalent square length. RESULTS: No significant differences in dosimetric qualities were found between plans with flattened and FFF beams. The ASC settings did not have significant effects on dosimetric qualities in the H&N plan cohort, but the “very high” ASC setting resulted in poorer dosimetric results for the prostate plans. Plans with FFF beams had significantly higher MU/Dose compared to plans with flattened beams. The use of flattening filter (FF) had significant effects on the change in gantry speed, with flattened beams producing plans that required higher change in gantry speed. However, the FF did not have significant effects on MLC speed, EM, or equivalent square length. In contrast, ASC settings had significant effects on these three metrics; increasing the ASC level resulted in plans with decreasing MLC speed, lower edge area ratio, and higher equivalent square length. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that using FFF beams with various ASC settings, except for the “very high” level, can produce plans with reduced complexities without compromising dosimetric qualities in conventional large‐field treatment plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10647973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106479732023-08-01 The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans Hui, Cheukkai B. Pourmoghaddas, Amir Mutaf, Yildirim D. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of using flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams and the aperture shape controller (ASC) on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 24 head and neck (H&N) and 24 prostate with pelvic nodes treatment plans were used in this study. Each plan was reoptimized using the original clinical objectives with both flattened and FFF beams, as well as six different ASC settings. The dosimetric qualities of each plan cohort were evaluated using commonly used dose‐volume histogram values, and plan complexities were assessed through metrics including monitor unit (MU)/Dose, change in gantry speed, multileaf collimator (MLC) speed, the edge area ratio metric (EM), and the equivalent square length. RESULTS: No significant differences in dosimetric qualities were found between plans with flattened and FFF beams. The ASC settings did not have significant effects on dosimetric qualities in the H&N plan cohort, but the “very high” ASC setting resulted in poorer dosimetric results for the prostate plans. Plans with FFF beams had significantly higher MU/Dose compared to plans with flattened beams. The use of flattening filter (FF) had significant effects on the change in gantry speed, with flattened beams producing plans that required higher change in gantry speed. However, the FF did not have significant effects on MLC speed, EM, or equivalent square length. In contrast, ASC settings had significant effects on these three metrics; increasing the ASC level resulted in plans with decreasing MLC speed, lower edge area ratio, and higher equivalent square length. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that using FFF beams with various ASC settings, except for the “very high” level, can produce plans with reduced complexities without compromising dosimetric qualities in conventional large‐field treatment plans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10647973/ /pubmed/37528683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14108 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hui, Cheukkai B.
Pourmoghaddas, Amir
Mutaf, Yildirim D.
The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans
title The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans
title_full The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans
title_fullStr The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans
title_full_unstemmed The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans
title_short The effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans
title_sort effects of flattening filter‐free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large‐field treatment plans
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14108
work_keys_str_mv AT huicheukkaib theeffectsofflatteningfilterfreebeamsandapertureshapecontrolleronthecomplexityofconventionallargefieldtreatmentplans
AT pourmoghaddasamir theeffectsofflatteningfilterfreebeamsandapertureshapecontrolleronthecomplexityofconventionallargefieldtreatmentplans
AT mutafyildirimd theeffectsofflatteningfilterfreebeamsandapertureshapecontrolleronthecomplexityofconventionallargefieldtreatmentplans
AT huicheukkaib effectsofflatteningfilterfreebeamsandapertureshapecontrolleronthecomplexityofconventionallargefieldtreatmentplans
AT pourmoghaddasamir effectsofflatteningfilterfreebeamsandapertureshapecontrolleronthecomplexityofconventionallargefieldtreatmentplans
AT mutafyildirimd effectsofflatteningfilterfreebeamsandapertureshapecontrolleronthecomplexityofconventionallargefieldtreatmentplans