Cargando…

Evaluation of bladder filling effects on the dose distribution during radiotherapy for cervical cancer based on daily CT images

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the effects of bladder filling during cervical cancer radiotherapy on target volume and organs at risk (OARs) dose based on daily computed tomography (daily‐CT) images and provide bladder‐volume‐based dose prediction models. METHODS: Nineteen patients (475 daily‐C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Fan, Zhou, Mi, Wang, Gang, Li, Xutong, Yue, Lu, Deng, Lihua, Chi, Kun, Chen, Kai, Qi, Zhenyu, Deng, Xiaowu, Peng, Yinglin, Liu, Yimei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14097
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the effects of bladder filling during cervical cancer radiotherapy on target volume and organs at risk (OARs) dose based on daily computed tomography (daily‐CT) images and provide bladder‐volume‐based dose prediction models. METHODS: Nineteen patients (475 daily‐CTs) comprised the study group, and five patients comprised the validation set (25 daily‐CTs). Target volumes and OARs were delineated on daily‐CT images and the treatment plan was recalculated accordingly. The deviation from the planning bladder volume (DVB), the correlation between DVB and clinical (CTV)/planning (PTV) target volume in terms of prescribed dose coverage, and the relationship of small bowel volume and bladder dose with the ratio of bladder volume (RVB) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all cases, the prescribed dose coverage in the CTV was >95% when DVB was <200 cm(3), whereas that in the PTV was >95% when RVB was <160%. The ratio of bladder V(45 Gy) to the planning bladder V(45 Gy) (RBV(45)) exhibited a negative linear relationship with RVB (RBV(45) = −0.18*RVB + 120.8; R (2) = 0.80). Moreover, the ratio of small bowel volume to planning small bowel volume (RVS) exhibited a negative linear relationship with RVB (RVS = −1.06*RVB +217.59; R (2) = 0.41). The validation set results showed that the linear model predicted well the effects of bladder volume changes on target volume coverage and bladder dose. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed dosimetry and volume effects of bladder filling on target and OARs based on daily‐CT images. We established a quantitative relationship between these parameters, providing dose prediction models for cervical cancer radiotherapy.