Cargando…

Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort

PURPOSE: To construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning‐based low dose computed tomography (LDCT)‐derived parametric response mapping (PRM) model for predicting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 615 subjects from a community‐based screening pop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Xiuxiu, Pu, Yu, Zhang, Di, Guan, Yu, Lu, Yang, Zhang, Weidong, Fu, Chi‐Cheng, Fang, Qu, Zhang, Hanxiao, Liu, Shiyuan, Fan, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37782241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14171
_version_ 1785135234957705216
author Zhou, Xiuxiu
Pu, Yu
Zhang, Di
Guan, Yu
Lu, Yang
Zhang, Weidong
Fu, Chi‐Cheng
Fang, Qu
Zhang, Hanxiao
Liu, Shiyuan
Fan, Li
author_facet Zhou, Xiuxiu
Pu, Yu
Zhang, Di
Guan, Yu
Lu, Yang
Zhang, Weidong
Fu, Chi‐Cheng
Fang, Qu
Zhang, Hanxiao
Liu, Shiyuan
Fan, Li
author_sort Zhou, Xiuxiu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning‐based low dose computed tomography (LDCT)‐derived parametric response mapping (PRM) model for predicting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 615 subjects from a community‐based screening population (40–74 years old) with PFT parameters, including the ratio of the first second forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), the percentage of forced expiratory volume in the one second predicted (FEV1%), and registered inspiration‐to‐expiration chest CT scanning were enrolled retrospectively. Subjects were classified into a normal, high risk, and COPD group based on PFT. Data of 72 PRM‐derived quantitative parameters were collected, including volume and volume percentage of emphysema, functional‐small airways disease, and normal lung tissue. A machine‐learning with random forest regression model and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model were constructed and tested on PFT prediction, which was followed by evaluation of classification performance based on the PFT predictions. RESULTS: The machine‐learning model based on PRM parameters showed better performance for predicting PFT than MLP, with a coefficient of determination (R(2)) of 0.749 and 0.792 for FEV1/FVC and FEV1%, respectively. The Mean Squared Errors (MSE) for FEV1/FVC and FEV1% are 0.0030 and 0.0097 for the random forest model, respectively. The Root Mean Squared Errors (RMSE) for FEV1/FVC and FEV1% are 0.055 and 0.098, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating between the normal group and high‐risk group were 34/40 (85%), 65/72 (90%), and 99/112 (88%), respectively. For differentiating between the non‐COPD group and COPD group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 8/9 (89%), 112/112 (100%), 120/121 (99%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning‐based random forest model predicts PFT results in a community screening population based on PRM, and it identifies high risk COPD from normal populations with high sensitivity and reliably predicts of high‐risk COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10647993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106479932023-10-02 Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort Zhou, Xiuxiu Pu, Yu Zhang, Di Guan, Yu Lu, Yang Zhang, Weidong Fu, Chi‐Cheng Fang, Qu Zhang, Hanxiao Liu, Shiyuan Fan, Li J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: To construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning‐based low dose computed tomography (LDCT)‐derived parametric response mapping (PRM) model for predicting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 615 subjects from a community‐based screening population (40–74 years old) with PFT parameters, including the ratio of the first second forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), the percentage of forced expiratory volume in the one second predicted (FEV1%), and registered inspiration‐to‐expiration chest CT scanning were enrolled retrospectively. Subjects were classified into a normal, high risk, and COPD group based on PFT. Data of 72 PRM‐derived quantitative parameters were collected, including volume and volume percentage of emphysema, functional‐small airways disease, and normal lung tissue. A machine‐learning with random forest regression model and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model were constructed and tested on PFT prediction, which was followed by evaluation of classification performance based on the PFT predictions. RESULTS: The machine‐learning model based on PRM parameters showed better performance for predicting PFT than MLP, with a coefficient of determination (R(2)) of 0.749 and 0.792 for FEV1/FVC and FEV1%, respectively. The Mean Squared Errors (MSE) for FEV1/FVC and FEV1% are 0.0030 and 0.0097 for the random forest model, respectively. The Root Mean Squared Errors (RMSE) for FEV1/FVC and FEV1% are 0.055 and 0.098, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating between the normal group and high‐risk group were 34/40 (85%), 65/72 (90%), and 99/112 (88%), respectively. For differentiating between the non‐COPD group and COPD group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 8/9 (89%), 112/112 (100%), 120/121 (99%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning‐based random forest model predicts PFT results in a community screening population based on PRM, and it identifies high risk COPD from normal populations with high sensitivity and reliably predicts of high‐risk COPD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10647993/ /pubmed/37782241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14171 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Zhou, Xiuxiu
Pu, Yu
Zhang, Di
Guan, Yu
Lu, Yang
Zhang, Weidong
Fu, Chi‐Cheng
Fang, Qu
Zhang, Hanxiao
Liu, Shiyuan
Fan, Li
Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort
title Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort
title_full Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort
title_fullStr Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort
title_full_unstemmed Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort
title_short Development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose CT‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort
title_sort development of machine learning model to predict pulmonary function with low‐dose ct‐derived parameter response mapping in a community‐based chest screening cohort
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37782241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14171
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouxiuxiu developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT puyu developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT zhangdi developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT guanyu developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT luyang developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT zhangweidong developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT fuchicheng developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT fangqu developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT zhanghanxiao developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT liushiyuan developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort
AT fanli developmentofmachinelearningmodeltopredictpulmonaryfunctionwithlowdosectderivedparameterresponsemappinginacommunitybasedchestscreeningcohort