Cargando…

Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L.

Cannabis sativa L. is cultivated globally for its cannabinoid-dense inflorescences. Commercial preference for sinsemilla has led to the development of methods for producing feminized seeds through cross-pollination of cosexual (masculinized) female plants. Although the induction of cosexuality in Ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wizenberg, Sydney B., Muir-Guarnaccia, Jillian, Campbell, Lesley G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37960087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12213731
_version_ 1785135307249680384
author Wizenberg, Sydney B.
Muir-Guarnaccia, Jillian
Campbell, Lesley G.
author_facet Wizenberg, Sydney B.
Muir-Guarnaccia, Jillian
Campbell, Lesley G.
author_sort Wizenberg, Sydney B.
collection PubMed
description Cannabis sativa L. is cultivated globally for its cannabinoid-dense inflorescences. Commercial preference for sinsemilla has led to the development of methods for producing feminized seeds through cross-pollination of cosexual (masculinized) female plants. Although the induction of cosexuality in Cannabis plants is common, to date, no work has empirically tested how masculinization of female Cannabis plants impacts male flowering, pollen production, pollen fitness, and related life-history trade-offs. Here, we cultivated a population of Cannabis plants (CFX-2) and explored how the route to cosexuality (drought vs. chemical induction) impacted flowering phenology, pollen production, and pollen fitness, relative to unsexual male plants. Unisexual males flowered earlier and longer than cosexual plants and produced 223% more total pollen (F(2,28) = 74.41, p < 0.001), but per-flower pollen production did not differ across reproductive phenotypes (F(2,21) = 0.887, p = 0.427). Pollen viability was 200% higher in unisexual males and drought-induced cosexuals (F(2,36) = 189.70, p < 0.001). Pollen non-abortion rates only differed in a marginally significant way across reproductive phenotypes (F(2,36) = 3.00, p = 0.06). Here, we demonstrate that masculinization of female plants impacts whole-plant pollen production and pollen fitness in Cannabis sativa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10648298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106482982023-10-31 Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L. Wizenberg, Sydney B. Muir-Guarnaccia, Jillian Campbell, Lesley G. Plants (Basel) Article Cannabis sativa L. is cultivated globally for its cannabinoid-dense inflorescences. Commercial preference for sinsemilla has led to the development of methods for producing feminized seeds through cross-pollination of cosexual (masculinized) female plants. Although the induction of cosexuality in Cannabis plants is common, to date, no work has empirically tested how masculinization of female Cannabis plants impacts male flowering, pollen production, pollen fitness, and related life-history trade-offs. Here, we cultivated a population of Cannabis plants (CFX-2) and explored how the route to cosexuality (drought vs. chemical induction) impacted flowering phenology, pollen production, and pollen fitness, relative to unsexual male plants. Unisexual males flowered earlier and longer than cosexual plants and produced 223% more total pollen (F(2,28) = 74.41, p < 0.001), but per-flower pollen production did not differ across reproductive phenotypes (F(2,21) = 0.887, p = 0.427). Pollen viability was 200% higher in unisexual males and drought-induced cosexuals (F(2,36) = 189.70, p < 0.001). Pollen non-abortion rates only differed in a marginally significant way across reproductive phenotypes (F(2,36) = 3.00, p = 0.06). Here, we demonstrate that masculinization of female plants impacts whole-plant pollen production and pollen fitness in Cannabis sativa. MDPI 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10648298/ /pubmed/37960087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12213731 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wizenberg, Sydney B.
Muir-Guarnaccia, Jillian
Campbell, Lesley G.
Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L.
title Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L.
title_full Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L.
title_fullStr Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L.
title_full_unstemmed Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L.
title_short Cosexuality Reduces Pollen Production and Fitness in Cannabis sativa L.
title_sort cosexuality reduces pollen production and fitness in cannabis sativa l.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37960087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12213731
work_keys_str_mv AT wizenbergsydneyb cosexualityreducespollenproductionandfitnessincannabissatival
AT muirguarnacciajillian cosexualityreducespollenproductionandfitnessincannabissatival
AT campbelllesleyg cosexualityreducespollenproductionandfitnessincannabissatival