Cargando…

Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus

BACKGROUND: Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) and Aedes koreicus (Edwards, 1917) have rapidly spread in Europe over the last decades. Both species are very closely related and occur in sympatry. Females and males are difficult to distinguish. However, the accurate species discrimination is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauer, Felix G., Pfitzner, Wolf Peter, Jöst, Hanna, Rauhöft, Leif, Kliemke, Konstantin, Lange, Unchana, Heitmann, Anna, Jansen, Stephanie, Lühken, Renke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37968721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06038-y
_version_ 1785147543809687552
author Sauer, Felix G.
Pfitzner, Wolf Peter
Jöst, Hanna
Rauhöft, Leif
Kliemke, Konstantin
Lange, Unchana
Heitmann, Anna
Jansen, Stephanie
Lühken, Renke
author_facet Sauer, Felix G.
Pfitzner, Wolf Peter
Jöst, Hanna
Rauhöft, Leif
Kliemke, Konstantin
Lange, Unchana
Heitmann, Anna
Jansen, Stephanie
Lühken, Renke
author_sort Sauer, Felix G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) and Aedes koreicus (Edwards, 1917) have rapidly spread in Europe over the last decades. Both species are very closely related and occur in sympatry. Females and males are difficult to distinguish. However, the accurate species discrimination is important as both species may differ in their vectorial capacity and spreading behaviour. In this study, we assessed the potential of geometric wing morphometrics as alternative to distinguish the two species. METHODS: A total of 147 Ae. j. japonicus specimens (77 females and 70 males) and 124 Ae. koreicus specimens (67 females and 57 males) were collected in southwest Germany. The left wing of each specimen was removed, mounted and photographed. The coordinates of 18 landmarks on the vein crosses were digitalised by a single observer. The resulting two-dimensional dataset was used to analyse the differences in the wing size (i.e. centroid size) and wing shape between Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. koreicus using geometric morphometrics. To analyse the reproducibility of the analysis, the landmark collection was repeated for 20 specimens per sex and species by two additional observers. RESULTS: The wing size in female Ae. koreicus was significantly greater than in Ae. j. japonicus but did not differ significantly for males. However, the strong overlap in wing size also for the females would not allow to discriminate the two species. In contrast, the wing shape clustering was species specific and a leave-one-out validation resulted in a reclassification accuracy of 96.5% for the females and 91.3% for the males. The data collected by different observers resulted in a similar accuracy, indicating a low observer bias for the landmark collection. CONCLUSIONS: Geometric wing morphometrics provide a reliable and robust tool to distinguish female and male specimens of Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. koreicus. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-023-06038-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10648383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106483832023-11-15 Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus Sauer, Felix G. Pfitzner, Wolf Peter Jöst, Hanna Rauhöft, Leif Kliemke, Konstantin Lange, Unchana Heitmann, Anna Jansen, Stephanie Lühken, Renke Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) and Aedes koreicus (Edwards, 1917) have rapidly spread in Europe over the last decades. Both species are very closely related and occur in sympatry. Females and males are difficult to distinguish. However, the accurate species discrimination is important as both species may differ in their vectorial capacity and spreading behaviour. In this study, we assessed the potential of geometric wing morphometrics as alternative to distinguish the two species. METHODS: A total of 147 Ae. j. japonicus specimens (77 females and 70 males) and 124 Ae. koreicus specimens (67 females and 57 males) were collected in southwest Germany. The left wing of each specimen was removed, mounted and photographed. The coordinates of 18 landmarks on the vein crosses were digitalised by a single observer. The resulting two-dimensional dataset was used to analyse the differences in the wing size (i.e. centroid size) and wing shape between Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. koreicus using geometric morphometrics. To analyse the reproducibility of the analysis, the landmark collection was repeated for 20 specimens per sex and species by two additional observers. RESULTS: The wing size in female Ae. koreicus was significantly greater than in Ae. j. japonicus but did not differ significantly for males. However, the strong overlap in wing size also for the females would not allow to discriminate the two species. In contrast, the wing shape clustering was species specific and a leave-one-out validation resulted in a reclassification accuracy of 96.5% for the females and 91.3% for the males. The data collected by different observers resulted in a similar accuracy, indicating a low observer bias for the landmark collection. CONCLUSIONS: Geometric wing morphometrics provide a reliable and robust tool to distinguish female and male specimens of Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. koreicus. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-023-06038-y. BioMed Central 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10648383/ /pubmed/37968721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06038-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sauer, Felix G.
Pfitzner, Wolf Peter
Jöst, Hanna
Rauhöft, Leif
Kliemke, Konstantin
Lange, Unchana
Heitmann, Anna
Jansen, Stephanie
Lühken, Renke
Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus
title Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus
title_full Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus
title_fullStr Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus
title_full_unstemmed Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus
title_short Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus
title_sort using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish aedes japonicus japonicus and aedes koreicus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37968721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06038-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sauerfelixg usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT pfitznerwolfpeter usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT josthanna usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT rauhoftleif usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT kliemkekonstantin usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT langeunchana usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT heitmannanna usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT jansenstephanie usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus
AT luhkenrenke usinggeometricwingmorphometricstodistinguishaedesjaponicusjaponicusandaedeskoreicus