Cargando…
A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes
This study used the sweeping air approach to conduct a comparative analysis of pervaporation (PV) and membrane distillation (MD) in the context of desalinating saline/hypersaline water. An experimental setup of the sweeping air arrangement was designed and built at a laboratory size to conduct the r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15214237 |
_version_ | 1785135365829427200 |
---|---|
author | Al-Harby, Nouf F. El Batouti, Mervette Elewa, Mahmoud M. |
author_facet | Al-Harby, Nouf F. El Batouti, Mervette Elewa, Mahmoud M. |
author_sort | Al-Harby, Nouf F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study used the sweeping air approach to conduct a comparative analysis of pervaporation (PV) and membrane distillation (MD) in the context of desalinating saline/hypersaline water. An experimental setup of the sweeping air arrangement was designed and built at a laboratory size to conduct the research. The desalination process using PV used innovatively designed cellulose acetate (CA) membranes specifically adapted for this purpose. Conversely, in the studies involving MD, hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes were utilised. CA membranes were fabricated in our laboratory using the phase inversion approach. The physicochemical characteristics of the membranes were assessed using many methodologies, including FTIR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), contact angle measurement, and water uptake analysis. This facilitated a more comprehensive comprehension of the impact of the alkaline treatment on these features. The variables that were examined included the kind of membrane, the pore size of the PTFE membrane, the composition of the casting solution of CA, the concentration of the feed solution, the temperature of the feed, and the temperature of the condenser cooling water. The morphologies of the membranes were examined using SEM. The study’s findings indicated that the use of MD resulted in a greater flow and a remarkable percentage of salt rejection (% SR). Furthermore, it was observed that the flux was positively correlated with the feed temperature, while it exhibited an inverse relationship with the cooling water temperature. Moreover, it was observed that the impact of the pore size of the PTFE membrane on the desalination process was found to be minimal. The most optimal outcomes obtained were 13.35 kg/m(2) h with a percentage salt rejection (% SR) of 99.86, and 17.96 kg/m(2) h with a % SR of 99.83 at a temperature of 70 °C, while using MD and PV technologies, respectively. Furthermore, both methods demonstrated the capability to desalinate very salty solutions with a salinity level of up to 160 g/L, thereby yielding potable water in a single step. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10648555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106485552023-10-27 A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes Al-Harby, Nouf F. El Batouti, Mervette Elewa, Mahmoud M. Polymers (Basel) Article This study used the sweeping air approach to conduct a comparative analysis of pervaporation (PV) and membrane distillation (MD) in the context of desalinating saline/hypersaline water. An experimental setup of the sweeping air arrangement was designed and built at a laboratory size to conduct the research. The desalination process using PV used innovatively designed cellulose acetate (CA) membranes specifically adapted for this purpose. Conversely, in the studies involving MD, hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes were utilised. CA membranes were fabricated in our laboratory using the phase inversion approach. The physicochemical characteristics of the membranes were assessed using many methodologies, including FTIR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), contact angle measurement, and water uptake analysis. This facilitated a more comprehensive comprehension of the impact of the alkaline treatment on these features. The variables that were examined included the kind of membrane, the pore size of the PTFE membrane, the composition of the casting solution of CA, the concentration of the feed solution, the temperature of the feed, and the temperature of the condenser cooling water. The morphologies of the membranes were examined using SEM. The study’s findings indicated that the use of MD resulted in a greater flow and a remarkable percentage of salt rejection (% SR). Furthermore, it was observed that the flux was positively correlated with the feed temperature, while it exhibited an inverse relationship with the cooling water temperature. Moreover, it was observed that the impact of the pore size of the PTFE membrane on the desalination process was found to be minimal. The most optimal outcomes obtained were 13.35 kg/m(2) h with a percentage salt rejection (% SR) of 99.86, and 17.96 kg/m(2) h with a % SR of 99.83 at a temperature of 70 °C, while using MD and PV technologies, respectively. Furthermore, both methods demonstrated the capability to desalinate very salty solutions with a salinity level of up to 160 g/L, thereby yielding potable water in a single step. MDPI 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10648555/ /pubmed/37959917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15214237 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Al-Harby, Nouf F. El Batouti, Mervette Elewa, Mahmoud M. A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes |
title_full | A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes |
title_short | A Comparative Analysis of Pervaporation and Membrane Distillation Techniques for Desalination Utilising the Sweeping Air Methodology with Novel and Economical Pervaporation Membranes |
title_sort | comparative analysis of pervaporation and membrane distillation techniques for desalination utilising the sweeping air methodology with novel and economical pervaporation membranes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15214237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alharbynouff acomparativeanalysisofpervaporationandmembranedistillationtechniquesfordesalinationutilisingthesweepingairmethodologywithnovelandeconomicalpervaporationmembranes AT elbatoutimervette acomparativeanalysisofpervaporationandmembranedistillationtechniquesfordesalinationutilisingthesweepingairmethodologywithnovelandeconomicalpervaporationmembranes AT elewamahmoudm acomparativeanalysisofpervaporationandmembranedistillationtechniquesfordesalinationutilisingthesweepingairmethodologywithnovelandeconomicalpervaporationmembranes AT alharbynouff comparativeanalysisofpervaporationandmembranedistillationtechniquesfordesalinationutilisingthesweepingairmethodologywithnovelandeconomicalpervaporationmembranes AT elbatoutimervette comparativeanalysisofpervaporationandmembranedistillationtechniquesfordesalinationutilisingthesweepingairmethodologywithnovelandeconomicalpervaporationmembranes AT elewamahmoudm comparativeanalysisofpervaporationandmembranedistillationtechniquesfordesalinationutilisingthesweepingairmethodologywithnovelandeconomicalpervaporationmembranes |