Cargando…

Sepsis Outcome after Major Abdominal Surgery Does Not Seem to Be Improved by the Use of Pentameric Immunoglobulin IgM: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Background: Sepsis still represents a major public health issue worldwide, and the immune system plays a main role during infections; therefore, its activity is mandatory to resolve this clinical condition. In this report, we aimed to retrospectively verify in a real-life setting the possible useful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perrella, Alessandro, Rinaldi, Luca, Guarino, Ilaria, Bernardi, Francesca Futura, Castriconi, Maurizio, Antropoli, Carmine, Pafundi, Pia Clara, Di Micco, Pierpaolo, Sarno, Marina, Capoluongo, Nicolina, Minei, Giuseppina, Perrella, Marco, Frangiosa, Antonio, Capuano, Annalisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216887
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Sepsis still represents a major public health issue worldwide, and the immune system plays a main role during infections; therefore, its activity is mandatory to resolve this clinical condition. In this report, we aimed to retrospectively verify in a real-life setting the possible usefulness of pentameric IgM plus antibiotics in recovering patients with sepsis after major abdominal surgery. Materials/methods: We reviewed, from January 2013 until December 2019, all adult patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis or septic shock (2) after major abdominal surgery. Among these patients, were identified those that, according to legal indication and licenses in Italy, were treated with pentameric IgM plus antibiotics (Group A) or with antibiotics alone (Group B). The following parameters were evaluated: blood gas analysis, lactate, CRP, procalcitonin, endotoxin activity, liver and renal function, coagulation and blood cell count at different time points (every 48 h for at least 7 days). Differences between groups were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test or a chi-square test for categorical variables. A Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test were instead been performed to compare continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate analysis were also performed. Results: Over a period of 30 months, 24 patients were enrolled in Group A and 20 patients in Group B. In those subjects, no statistical differences were found in terms of bacterial or fungal infection isolates, when detected in a blood culture test, or according to inflammatory index, a score, lactate levels and mortality rate. A 48 h response was statistically more frequent in Group B than in Group A, while no differences were found in other clinical and laboratory evaluations. Conclusions: Based on our results, the use of pentameric IgM does not seem to give any clinical advantages in preventing sepsis after major abdominal surgery.