Cargando…
Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Quantitative genetics theory postulates that genetic variance in closed populations under directional selection can considerably decrease. As genetic variance directly influences selection response, animal breeders are actively monitoring its changes over time to ensure the sustainab...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37958060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13213306 |
_version_ | 1785135510150184960 |
---|---|
author | Sosa-Madrid, Bolívar Samuel Maniatis, Gerasimos Ibáñez-Escriche, Noelia Avendaño, Santiago Kranis, Andreas |
author_facet | Sosa-Madrid, Bolívar Samuel Maniatis, Gerasimos Ibáñez-Escriche, Noelia Avendaño, Santiago Kranis, Andreas |
author_sort | Sosa-Madrid, Bolívar Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Quantitative genetics theory postulates that genetic variance in closed populations under directional selection can considerably decrease. As genetic variance directly influences selection response, animal breeders are actively monitoring its changes over time to ensure the sustainability of their breeding programmes. Here, we evaluated three different approaches to computing variance components over a period of twenty-three years in a commercial broiler (meat-type chicken) population undergoing multi-trait selection. Our results showed that the trajectory of variance components fluctuated, but no overall decline trend was detected. In light of these findings, we discuss the implications for the long-term sustainability of broiler breeding programmes. ABSTRACT: Monitoring the genetic variance of traits is a key priority to ensure the sustainability of breeding programmes in populations under directional selection, since directional selection can decrease genetic variation over time. Studies monitoring changes in genetic variation have typically used long-term data from small experimental populations selected for a handful of traits. Here, we used a large dataset from a commercial breeding line spread over a period of twenty-three years. A total of 2,059,869 records and 2,062,112 animals in the pedigree were used for the estimations of variance components for the traits: body weight (BWT; 2,059,869 records) and hen-housed egg production (HHP; 45,939 records). Data were analysed with three estimation approaches: sliding overlapping windows, under frequentist (restricted maximum likelihood (REML)) and Bayesian (Gibbs sampling) methods; expected variances using coefficients of the full relationship matrix; and a “double trait covariances” analysis by computing correlations and covariances between the same trait in two distinct consecutive windows. The genetic variance showed marginal fluctuations in its estimation over time. Whereas genetic, maternal permanent environmental, and residual variances were similar for BWT in both the REML and Gibbs methods, variance components when using the Gibbs method for HHP were smaller than the variances estimated when using REML. Large data amounts were needed to estimate variance components and detect their changes. For Gibbs (REML), the changes in genetic variance from 1999–2001 to 2020–2022 were 82.29 to 93.75 (82.84 to 93.68) for BWT and 76.68 to 95.67 (98.42 to 109.04) for HHP. Heritability presented a similar pattern as the genetic variance estimation, changing from 0.32 to 0.36 (0.32 to 0.36) for BWT and 0.16 to 0.15 (0.21 to 0.18) for HHP. On the whole, genetic parameters tended slightly to increase over time. The expected variance estimates were lower than the estimates when using overlapping windows. That indicates the low effect of the drift-selection process on the genetic variance, or likely, the presence of genetic variation sources compensating for the loss. Double trait covariance analysis confirmed the maintenance of variances over time, presenting genetic correlations >0.86 for BWT and >0.82 for HHP. Monitoring genetic variance in broiler breeding programmes is important to sustain genetic progress. Although the genetic variances of both traits fluctuated over time, in some windows, particularly between 2003 and 2020, increasing trends were observed, which warrants further research on the impact of other factors, such as novel mutations, operating on the dynamics of genetic variance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10649193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106491932023-10-24 Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits Sosa-Madrid, Bolívar Samuel Maniatis, Gerasimos Ibáñez-Escriche, Noelia Avendaño, Santiago Kranis, Andreas Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Quantitative genetics theory postulates that genetic variance in closed populations under directional selection can considerably decrease. As genetic variance directly influences selection response, animal breeders are actively monitoring its changes over time to ensure the sustainability of their breeding programmes. Here, we evaluated three different approaches to computing variance components over a period of twenty-three years in a commercial broiler (meat-type chicken) population undergoing multi-trait selection. Our results showed that the trajectory of variance components fluctuated, but no overall decline trend was detected. In light of these findings, we discuss the implications for the long-term sustainability of broiler breeding programmes. ABSTRACT: Monitoring the genetic variance of traits is a key priority to ensure the sustainability of breeding programmes in populations under directional selection, since directional selection can decrease genetic variation over time. Studies monitoring changes in genetic variation have typically used long-term data from small experimental populations selected for a handful of traits. Here, we used a large dataset from a commercial breeding line spread over a period of twenty-three years. A total of 2,059,869 records and 2,062,112 animals in the pedigree were used for the estimations of variance components for the traits: body weight (BWT; 2,059,869 records) and hen-housed egg production (HHP; 45,939 records). Data were analysed with three estimation approaches: sliding overlapping windows, under frequentist (restricted maximum likelihood (REML)) and Bayesian (Gibbs sampling) methods; expected variances using coefficients of the full relationship matrix; and a “double trait covariances” analysis by computing correlations and covariances between the same trait in two distinct consecutive windows. The genetic variance showed marginal fluctuations in its estimation over time. Whereas genetic, maternal permanent environmental, and residual variances were similar for BWT in both the REML and Gibbs methods, variance components when using the Gibbs method for HHP were smaller than the variances estimated when using REML. Large data amounts were needed to estimate variance components and detect their changes. For Gibbs (REML), the changes in genetic variance from 1999–2001 to 2020–2022 were 82.29 to 93.75 (82.84 to 93.68) for BWT and 76.68 to 95.67 (98.42 to 109.04) for HHP. Heritability presented a similar pattern as the genetic variance estimation, changing from 0.32 to 0.36 (0.32 to 0.36) for BWT and 0.16 to 0.15 (0.21 to 0.18) for HHP. On the whole, genetic parameters tended slightly to increase over time. The expected variance estimates were lower than the estimates when using overlapping windows. That indicates the low effect of the drift-selection process on the genetic variance, or likely, the presence of genetic variation sources compensating for the loss. Double trait covariance analysis confirmed the maintenance of variances over time, presenting genetic correlations >0.86 for BWT and >0.82 for HHP. Monitoring genetic variance in broiler breeding programmes is important to sustain genetic progress. Although the genetic variances of both traits fluctuated over time, in some windows, particularly between 2003 and 2020, increasing trends were observed, which warrants further research on the impact of other factors, such as novel mutations, operating on the dynamics of genetic variance. MDPI 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10649193/ /pubmed/37958060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13213306 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sosa-Madrid, Bolívar Samuel Maniatis, Gerasimos Ibáñez-Escriche, Noelia Avendaño, Santiago Kranis, Andreas Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits |
title | Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits |
title_full | Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits |
title_fullStr | Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits |
title_short | Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits |
title_sort | genetic variance estimation over time in broiler breeding programmes for growth and reproductive traits |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37958060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13213306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sosamadridbolivarsamuel geneticvarianceestimationovertimeinbroilerbreedingprogrammesforgrowthandreproductivetraits AT maniatisgerasimos geneticvarianceestimationovertimeinbroilerbreedingprogrammesforgrowthandreproductivetraits AT ibanezescrichenoelia geneticvarianceestimationovertimeinbroilerbreedingprogrammesforgrowthandreproductivetraits AT avendanosantiago geneticvarianceestimationovertimeinbroilerbreedingprogrammesforgrowthandreproductivetraits AT kranisandreas geneticvarianceestimationovertimeinbroilerbreedingprogrammesforgrowthandreproductivetraits |