Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torbjørnsen, Astrid, Jensen, Annesofie Lunde, Singstad, Tone, Weldingh, Nina Mickelson, Holmen, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37963648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628
_version_ 1785147561922789376
author Torbjørnsen, Astrid
Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
Singstad, Tone
Weldingh, Nina Mickelson
Holmen, Heidi
author_facet Torbjørnsen, Astrid
Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
Singstad, Tone
Weldingh, Nina Mickelson
Holmen, Heidi
author_sort Torbjørnsen, Astrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO measures alongside the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the framework of Arksey and O’Malley with scoping searches of Cinahl, EMBASE, Medline and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Studies reporting on adults with diabetes in a clinical setting where the PRO measure response directly affected patient care were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 35 197 citations were identified, of which 7 reports presenting 4 different PRO measures were included in the review. All four of the included items measured psychosocial aspects of diabetes, and three included elements of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale. All the patients were satisfied with the use of PRO measures in clinical care, whereas the level of satisfaction among healthcare personnel with PRO measures varied within and among studies. CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of eligible studies in this review suggests that research on PRO measures for diabetes outpatient care is scarce. Patients welcome the opportunity to express their concerns through the systematic collection of PRO measures, and some healthcare personnel value the broader insight that PRO measures provide into the impact of diabetes on patients’ lives. However, the heterogeneity among services and among patients challenges the implementation of PRO measures. Research is needed to explore how PRO measures in clinical outpatient care affect healthcare personnel workflow. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46AHC
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10649597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106495972023-11-14 Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review Torbjørnsen, Astrid Jensen, Annesofie Lunde Singstad, Tone Weldingh, Nina Mickelson Holmen, Heidi BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Clinical care/Education/Nutrition BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO measures alongside the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the framework of Arksey and O’Malley with scoping searches of Cinahl, EMBASE, Medline and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Studies reporting on adults with diabetes in a clinical setting where the PRO measure response directly affected patient care were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 35 197 citations were identified, of which 7 reports presenting 4 different PRO measures were included in the review. All four of the included items measured psychosocial aspects of diabetes, and three included elements of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale. All the patients were satisfied with the use of PRO measures in clinical care, whereas the level of satisfaction among healthcare personnel with PRO measures varied within and among studies. CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of eligible studies in this review suggests that research on PRO measures for diabetes outpatient care is scarce. Patients welcome the opportunity to express their concerns through the systematic collection of PRO measures, and some healthcare personnel value the broader insight that PRO measures provide into the impact of diabetes on patients’ lives. However, the heterogeneity among services and among patients challenges the implementation of PRO measures. Research is needed to explore how PRO measures in clinical outpatient care affect healthcare personnel workflow. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46AHC BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10649597/ /pubmed/37963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical care/Education/Nutrition
Torbjørnsen, Astrid
Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
Singstad, Tone
Weldingh, Nina Mickelson
Holmen, Heidi
Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
title Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
topic Clinical care/Education/Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37963648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628
work_keys_str_mv AT torbjørnsenastrid patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview
AT jensenannesofielunde patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview
AT singstadtone patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview
AT weldinghninamickelson patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview
AT holmenheidi patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview