Cargando…
Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628 |
_version_ | 1785147561922789376 |
---|---|
author | Torbjørnsen, Astrid Jensen, Annesofie Lunde Singstad, Tone Weldingh, Nina Mickelson Holmen, Heidi |
author_facet | Torbjørnsen, Astrid Jensen, Annesofie Lunde Singstad, Tone Weldingh, Nina Mickelson Holmen, Heidi |
author_sort | Torbjørnsen, Astrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO measures alongside the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the framework of Arksey and O’Malley with scoping searches of Cinahl, EMBASE, Medline and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Studies reporting on adults with diabetes in a clinical setting where the PRO measure response directly affected patient care were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 35 197 citations were identified, of which 7 reports presenting 4 different PRO measures were included in the review. All four of the included items measured psychosocial aspects of diabetes, and three included elements of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale. All the patients were satisfied with the use of PRO measures in clinical care, whereas the level of satisfaction among healthcare personnel with PRO measures varied within and among studies. CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of eligible studies in this review suggests that research on PRO measures for diabetes outpatient care is scarce. Patients welcome the opportunity to express their concerns through the systematic collection of PRO measures, and some healthcare personnel value the broader insight that PRO measures provide into the impact of diabetes on patients’ lives. However, the heterogeneity among services and among patients challenges the implementation of PRO measures. Research is needed to explore how PRO measures in clinical outpatient care affect healthcare personnel workflow. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46AHC |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10649597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106495972023-11-14 Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review Torbjørnsen, Astrid Jensen, Annesofie Lunde Singstad, Tone Weldingh, Nina Mickelson Holmen, Heidi BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Clinical care/Education/Nutrition BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO measures alongside the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the framework of Arksey and O’Malley with scoping searches of Cinahl, EMBASE, Medline and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Studies reporting on adults with diabetes in a clinical setting where the PRO measure response directly affected patient care were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 35 197 citations were identified, of which 7 reports presenting 4 different PRO measures were included in the review. All four of the included items measured psychosocial aspects of diabetes, and three included elements of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale. All the patients were satisfied with the use of PRO measures in clinical care, whereas the level of satisfaction among healthcare personnel with PRO measures varied within and among studies. CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of eligible studies in this review suggests that research on PRO measures for diabetes outpatient care is scarce. Patients welcome the opportunity to express their concerns through the systematic collection of PRO measures, and some healthcare personnel value the broader insight that PRO measures provide into the impact of diabetes on patients’ lives. However, the heterogeneity among services and among patients challenges the implementation of PRO measures. Research is needed to explore how PRO measures in clinical outpatient care affect healthcare personnel workflow. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46AHC BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10649597/ /pubmed/37963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical care/Education/Nutrition Torbjørnsen, Astrid Jensen, Annesofie Lunde Singstad, Tone Weldingh, Nina Mickelson Holmen, Heidi Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review |
title | Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review |
title_full | Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review |
title_short | Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review |
title_sort | patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review |
topic | Clinical care/Education/Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37963648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torbjørnsenastrid patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview AT jensenannesofielunde patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview AT singstadtone patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview AT weldinghninamickelson patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview AT holmenheidi patientreportedoutcomemeasuresindiabetesoutpatientcareascopingreview |