Cargando…
The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse
OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach for patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The aim of this international survey was to assess the patterns in treatment of rectal prolapse. DESIGN: A 23-question survey was distributed to the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000198 |
_version_ | 1785147564873482240 |
---|---|
author | Kelley, Jesse K Hagen, Edward R Gurland, Brooke Stevenson, Andrew RL Ogilvie, James W |
author_facet | Kelley, Jesse K Hagen, Edward R Gurland, Brooke Stevenson, Andrew RL Ogilvie, James W |
author_sort | Kelley, Jesse K |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach for patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The aim of this international survey was to assess the patterns in treatment of rectal prolapse. DESIGN: A 23-question survey was distributed to the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colorectal Surgeons, the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand, and the Pelvic Floor Society. Questions pertained to surgeon and practice demographics, preoperative evaluation, procedural preferences, and educational needs. SETTING: Electronic survey distributed to colorectal surgeons of diverse practice settings PARTICIPANTS: 249 colorectal surgeons responded to the survey, 65% of which were male. There was wide variability in age, years in practice, and practice setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to questions regarding preoperative workup preferences and clinical scenarios. RESULTS: In preoperative evaluation, 19% would perform anorectal physiology testing and 70% would evaluate for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse. In a healthy patient, 90% would perform a minimally invasive abdominal approach, including ventral rectopexy (56%), suture rectopexy (31%), mesh rectopexy (6%) and resection rectopexy (5%). In terms of ventral rectopexy, surgeons in the Americas preferred a synthetic mesh (61.9% vs 38.1%, p=0.59) whereas surgeons from Australasia preferred biologic grafts (75% vs 25%, p<0.01). In an older patient with comorbidities 81% would perform a perineal approach. Procedure preference (Delormes vs Altmeier) varied according to location (Australasia, 85.9% vs 14.1%; Europe, 75.3% vs 24.7%; Americas, 14.1% vs 85.9%). Most participants were interested in education regarding surgical approaches, however there is wide variability in preferred methods. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the preoperative evaluation and surgery performed for rectal prolapse. Given the lack of consensus, it is not surprising that most surgeons desire further education on the topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10649678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106496782023-11-14 The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse Kelley, Jesse K Hagen, Edward R Gurland, Brooke Stevenson, Andrew RL Ogilvie, James W BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol Original Research OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach for patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The aim of this international survey was to assess the patterns in treatment of rectal prolapse. DESIGN: A 23-question survey was distributed to the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colorectal Surgeons, the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand, and the Pelvic Floor Society. Questions pertained to surgeon and practice demographics, preoperative evaluation, procedural preferences, and educational needs. SETTING: Electronic survey distributed to colorectal surgeons of diverse practice settings PARTICIPANTS: 249 colorectal surgeons responded to the survey, 65% of which were male. There was wide variability in age, years in practice, and practice setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to questions regarding preoperative workup preferences and clinical scenarios. RESULTS: In preoperative evaluation, 19% would perform anorectal physiology testing and 70% would evaluate for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse. In a healthy patient, 90% would perform a minimally invasive abdominal approach, including ventral rectopexy (56%), suture rectopexy (31%), mesh rectopexy (6%) and resection rectopexy (5%). In terms of ventral rectopexy, surgeons in the Americas preferred a synthetic mesh (61.9% vs 38.1%, p=0.59) whereas surgeons from Australasia preferred biologic grafts (75% vs 25%, p<0.01). In an older patient with comorbidities 81% would perform a perineal approach. Procedure preference (Delormes vs Altmeier) varied according to location (Australasia, 85.9% vs 14.1%; Europe, 75.3% vs 24.7%; Americas, 14.1% vs 85.9%). Most participants were interested in education regarding surgical approaches, however there is wide variability in preferred methods. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the preoperative evaluation and surgery performed for rectal prolapse. Given the lack of consensus, it is not surprising that most surgeons desire further education on the topic. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10649678/ /pubmed/38020494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000198 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kelley, Jesse K Hagen, Edward R Gurland, Brooke Stevenson, Andrew RL Ogilvie, James W The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse |
title | The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse |
title_full | The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse |
title_fullStr | The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse |
title_full_unstemmed | The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse |
title_short | The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse |
title_sort | international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kelleyjessek theinternationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT hagenedwardr theinternationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT gurlandbrooke theinternationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT stevensonandrewrl theinternationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT ogilviejamesw theinternationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT kelleyjessek internationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT hagenedwardr internationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT gurlandbrooke internationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT stevensonandrewrl internationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse AT ogilviejamesw internationalvariabilityofsurgeryforrectalprolapse |