Cargando…
Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools
Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216814 |
_version_ | 1785135626127933440 |
---|---|
author | Golla, Kathrin Benesic, Andreas Mannell, Hanna Dreischulte, Tobias Grill, Eva Strobach, Dorothea |
author_facet | Golla, Kathrin Benesic, Andreas Mannell, Hanna Dreischulte, Tobias Grill, Eva Strobach, Dorothea |
author_sort | Golla, Kathrin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four liver scores as potential screening instruments. We retrospectively recorded liver/bile diagnoses, symptoms and abnormalities (summarized as hepatic findings) of 200 surgical patients followed by an assessment of the relevance of these findings for drug therapy (rating). The agreement between the Model of Endstage Liver Disease (MELD), Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), Fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the rating was quantified by Cohen’s Kappa. The performance of the scores in this setting was further evaluated by their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Of 200 patients, 18 (9%) had hepatic findings relevant for drug therapy. Fair agreement was found for FIB-4 and MELD and slight agreement for APRI and NFS compared to the rating. The highest values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 41.2% (MELD), 99.3% (APRI), 66.7% (APRI), and 93.6% (MELD), respectively. Due to low performance, none of the scores can be recommended for clinical use as a single screening tool for HI at hospital admission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10649763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106497632023-10-27 Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools Golla, Kathrin Benesic, Andreas Mannell, Hanna Dreischulte, Tobias Grill, Eva Strobach, Dorothea J Clin Med Article Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four liver scores as potential screening instruments. We retrospectively recorded liver/bile diagnoses, symptoms and abnormalities (summarized as hepatic findings) of 200 surgical patients followed by an assessment of the relevance of these findings for drug therapy (rating). The agreement between the Model of Endstage Liver Disease (MELD), Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), Fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the rating was quantified by Cohen’s Kappa. The performance of the scores in this setting was further evaluated by their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Of 200 patients, 18 (9%) had hepatic findings relevant for drug therapy. Fair agreement was found for FIB-4 and MELD and slight agreement for APRI and NFS compared to the rating. The highest values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 41.2% (MELD), 99.3% (APRI), 66.7% (APRI), and 93.6% (MELD), respectively. Due to low performance, none of the scores can be recommended for clinical use as a single screening tool for HI at hospital admission. MDPI 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10649763/ /pubmed/37959279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216814 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Golla, Kathrin Benesic, Andreas Mannell, Hanna Dreischulte, Tobias Grill, Eva Strobach, Dorothea Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools |
title | Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools |
title_full | Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools |
title_fullStr | Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools |
title_short | Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools |
title_sort | hepatic impairment as a risk factor for drug safety: suitability and comparison of four liver scores as screening tools |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gollakathrin hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools AT benesicandreas hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools AT mannellhanna hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools AT dreischultetobias hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools AT grilleva hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools AT strobachdorothea hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools |