Cargando…

Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools

Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golla, Kathrin, Benesic, Andreas, Mannell, Hanna, Dreischulte, Tobias, Grill, Eva, Strobach, Dorothea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216814
_version_ 1785135626127933440
author Golla, Kathrin
Benesic, Andreas
Mannell, Hanna
Dreischulte, Tobias
Grill, Eva
Strobach, Dorothea
author_facet Golla, Kathrin
Benesic, Andreas
Mannell, Hanna
Dreischulte, Tobias
Grill, Eva
Strobach, Dorothea
author_sort Golla, Kathrin
collection PubMed
description Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four liver scores as potential screening instruments. We retrospectively recorded liver/bile diagnoses, symptoms and abnormalities (summarized as hepatic findings) of 200 surgical patients followed by an assessment of the relevance of these findings for drug therapy (rating). The agreement between the Model of Endstage Liver Disease (MELD), Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), Fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the rating was quantified by Cohen’s Kappa. The performance of the scores in this setting was further evaluated by their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Of 200 patients, 18 (9%) had hepatic findings relevant for drug therapy. Fair agreement was found for FIB-4 and MELD and slight agreement for APRI and NFS compared to the rating. The highest values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 41.2% (MELD), 99.3% (APRI), 66.7% (APRI), and 93.6% (MELD), respectively. Due to low performance, none of the scores can be recommended for clinical use as a single screening tool for HI at hospital admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10649763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106497632023-10-27 Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools Golla, Kathrin Benesic, Andreas Mannell, Hanna Dreischulte, Tobias Grill, Eva Strobach, Dorothea J Clin Med Article Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four liver scores as potential screening instruments. We retrospectively recorded liver/bile diagnoses, symptoms and abnormalities (summarized as hepatic findings) of 200 surgical patients followed by an assessment of the relevance of these findings for drug therapy (rating). The agreement between the Model of Endstage Liver Disease (MELD), Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), Fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the rating was quantified by Cohen’s Kappa. The performance of the scores in this setting was further evaluated by their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Of 200 patients, 18 (9%) had hepatic findings relevant for drug therapy. Fair agreement was found for FIB-4 and MELD and slight agreement for APRI and NFS compared to the rating. The highest values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 41.2% (MELD), 99.3% (APRI), 66.7% (APRI), and 93.6% (MELD), respectively. Due to low performance, none of the scores can be recommended for clinical use as a single screening tool for HI at hospital admission. MDPI 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10649763/ /pubmed/37959279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216814 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Golla, Kathrin
Benesic, Andreas
Mannell, Hanna
Dreischulte, Tobias
Grill, Eva
Strobach, Dorothea
Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools
title Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools
title_full Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools
title_fullStr Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools
title_full_unstemmed Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools
title_short Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools
title_sort hepatic impairment as a risk factor for drug safety: suitability and comparison of four liver scores as screening tools
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216814
work_keys_str_mv AT gollakathrin hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools
AT benesicandreas hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools
AT mannellhanna hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools
AT dreischultetobias hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools
AT grilleva hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools
AT strobachdorothea hepaticimpairmentasariskfactorfordrugsafetysuitabilityandcomparisonoffourliverscoresasscreeningtools