Cargando…

Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training

Introduction: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is a multisystemic disorder marked by impaired physical performance as one lead symptom. Since it has been suggested that endurance training as part of medical rehabilitation may be effective in improving physical performance capacity in PCS, this study aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mooren, Johanna M., Garbsch, René, Schäfer, Hendrik, Kotewitsch, Mona, Waranski, Melina, Teschler, Marc, Schmitz, Boris, Mooren, Frank C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216739
_version_ 1785135678530519040
author Mooren, Johanna M.
Garbsch, René
Schäfer, Hendrik
Kotewitsch, Mona
Waranski, Melina
Teschler, Marc
Schmitz, Boris
Mooren, Frank C.
author_facet Mooren, Johanna M.
Garbsch, René
Schäfer, Hendrik
Kotewitsch, Mona
Waranski, Melina
Teschler, Marc
Schmitz, Boris
Mooren, Frank C.
author_sort Mooren, Johanna M.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is a multisystemic disorder marked by impaired physical performance as one lead symptom. Since it has been suggested that endurance training as part of medical rehabilitation may be effective in improving physical performance capacity in PCS, this study aimed to compare different modes of aerobic endurance training. Methods: A total of 110 PCS patients (49.3 ± 11.8 years; 38% women; time after infection = 260.2 ± 127.5 days) underwent detailed clinical screening including symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing at admission and after 4–6 weeks of inpatient medical rehabilitation. Questionnaires were used to assess disease perception. Patients performed controlled isocaloric cycle ergometer training (3–5 sessions/week; 18 min) as either continuous training (CT) at 50% of maximal workload or as interval training (IT; load = 60%, relief = 30%). Outcomes of PCS patients were compared to coronary artery disease patients (CAD; n = 96) to evaluate overall training effectiveness. Results: Training participation was comparable between the groups, with no indication of training-specific exercise-induced fatigue. Overall, PCS patients improved significantly by a mean of 6.8 ± 12.1% for W at VT1; 3.1 ± 10.0% for VO(2) at VT1; 5.5 ± 14.7% for O(2) pulse at VT1; 7.5 ± 15.0% for W at VO(2peak); 2.7 ± 11.0% for VO(2peak) and 4.6 ± 12.4% for O(2) pulse at VO(2peak) (all p < 0.05) with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed reduced levels of fatigue, anxiety, and depression as well as improved quality of life and wellbeing (all p < 0.05). Compared to guideline-based cardiac rehabilitation, PCS patients showed a similar improvement in workload and oxygen uptake compared to CAD patients. Conclusion: PCS patients benefit from aerobic endurance training performed as moderate continuous or interval training as part of a medical rehabilitation program in terms of improved physical exercise capacity and disease perception. The results for PCS patients are comparable to the guideline-based rehabilitation of CAD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10649998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106499982023-10-25 Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training Mooren, Johanna M. Garbsch, René Schäfer, Hendrik Kotewitsch, Mona Waranski, Melina Teschler, Marc Schmitz, Boris Mooren, Frank C. J Clin Med Article Introduction: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is a multisystemic disorder marked by impaired physical performance as one lead symptom. Since it has been suggested that endurance training as part of medical rehabilitation may be effective in improving physical performance capacity in PCS, this study aimed to compare different modes of aerobic endurance training. Methods: A total of 110 PCS patients (49.3 ± 11.8 years; 38% women; time after infection = 260.2 ± 127.5 days) underwent detailed clinical screening including symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing at admission and after 4–6 weeks of inpatient medical rehabilitation. Questionnaires were used to assess disease perception. Patients performed controlled isocaloric cycle ergometer training (3–5 sessions/week; 18 min) as either continuous training (CT) at 50% of maximal workload or as interval training (IT; load = 60%, relief = 30%). Outcomes of PCS patients were compared to coronary artery disease patients (CAD; n = 96) to evaluate overall training effectiveness. Results: Training participation was comparable between the groups, with no indication of training-specific exercise-induced fatigue. Overall, PCS patients improved significantly by a mean of 6.8 ± 12.1% for W at VT1; 3.1 ± 10.0% for VO(2) at VT1; 5.5 ± 14.7% for O(2) pulse at VT1; 7.5 ± 15.0% for W at VO(2peak); 2.7 ± 11.0% for VO(2peak) and 4.6 ± 12.4% for O(2) pulse at VO(2peak) (all p < 0.05) with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed reduced levels of fatigue, anxiety, and depression as well as improved quality of life and wellbeing (all p < 0.05). Compared to guideline-based cardiac rehabilitation, PCS patients showed a similar improvement in workload and oxygen uptake compared to CAD patients. Conclusion: PCS patients benefit from aerobic endurance training performed as moderate continuous or interval training as part of a medical rehabilitation program in terms of improved physical exercise capacity and disease perception. The results for PCS patients are comparable to the guideline-based rehabilitation of CAD patients. MDPI 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10649998/ /pubmed/37959205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216739 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mooren, Johanna M.
Garbsch, René
Schäfer, Hendrik
Kotewitsch, Mona
Waranski, Melina
Teschler, Marc
Schmitz, Boris
Mooren, Frank C.
Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training
title Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training
title_full Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training
title_fullStr Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training
title_full_unstemmed Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training
title_short Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training
title_sort medical rehabilitation of patients with post-covid-19 syndrome—a comparison of aerobic interval and continuous training
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216739
work_keys_str_mv AT moorenjohannam medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining
AT garbschrene medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining
AT schaferhendrik medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining
AT kotewitschmona medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining
AT waranskimelina medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining
AT teschlermarc medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining
AT schmitzboris medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining
AT moorenfrankc medicalrehabilitationofpatientswithpostcovid19syndromeacomparisonofaerobicintervalandcontinuoustraining