Cargando…

GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures

Background: Intertrochanteric fractures are a global health concern, especially in aging populations like the Republic of Korea. Surgical treatments like intramedullary nailing are preferred for their benefit. Various hip nails are used worldwide, each with unique features and challenges. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Seungcheol, Lee, Minjae, Lee, Heeyeon, Hwang, Jihyo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959186
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216720
_version_ 1785135685869502464
author Kwon, Seungcheol
Lee, Minjae
Lee, Heeyeon
Hwang, Jihyo
author_facet Kwon, Seungcheol
Lee, Minjae
Lee, Heeyeon
Hwang, Jihyo
author_sort Kwon, Seungcheol
collection PubMed
description Background: Intertrochanteric fractures are a global health concern, especially in aging populations like the Republic of Korea. Surgical treatments like intramedullary nailing are preferred for their benefit. Various hip nails are used worldwide, each with unique features and challenges. This study aims to compare the GS hip nail with the Affixus hip fracture nail for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Material and Methods: This retrospective study, conducted at a single center, included 179 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric fractures using the GS hip nail or the Affixus hip fracture nail. Excluding specific cases, 43 patients in the GS group and 46 in the Affixus group met the minimum 6-month follow-up criteria. Result: The GS group exhibited a significantly shorter mean operation time (43.26 min) compared to the Affixus group (51.11 min). Radiographically, both groups showed no significant differences in their reduction quality, tip, and apex distance (TAD), or Cleveland index in the immediate postoperative window. However, the GS group achieved a greater valgus reduction based on the contralateral femoral neck shaft angle (NSA). At 6 months post-operation, there were no significant differences in TAD or advancement and sliding distances. Complication rates were similar between the two groups, with no implant breakages. Clinical outcomes, as measured via mHHS and EQ-5D-5L, showed no significant differences. Despite a slightly higher implant cost, the GS group had a lower total hospital cost than the Affixus group, but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: This study highlights the efficiency of the GS hip nail in reducing the operation time compared to the Affixus hip fracture nail with comparable radiologic and clinical outcomes. Further research with long-term follow-up and larger patient studies are needed to fully assess its effectiveness in improving patient outcomes in hip fracture treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10650030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106500302023-10-24 GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures Kwon, Seungcheol Lee, Minjae Lee, Heeyeon Hwang, Jihyo J Clin Med Article Background: Intertrochanteric fractures are a global health concern, especially in aging populations like the Republic of Korea. Surgical treatments like intramedullary nailing are preferred for their benefit. Various hip nails are used worldwide, each with unique features and challenges. This study aims to compare the GS hip nail with the Affixus hip fracture nail for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Material and Methods: This retrospective study, conducted at a single center, included 179 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric fractures using the GS hip nail or the Affixus hip fracture nail. Excluding specific cases, 43 patients in the GS group and 46 in the Affixus group met the minimum 6-month follow-up criteria. Result: The GS group exhibited a significantly shorter mean operation time (43.26 min) compared to the Affixus group (51.11 min). Radiographically, both groups showed no significant differences in their reduction quality, tip, and apex distance (TAD), or Cleveland index in the immediate postoperative window. However, the GS group achieved a greater valgus reduction based on the contralateral femoral neck shaft angle (NSA). At 6 months post-operation, there were no significant differences in TAD or advancement and sliding distances. Complication rates were similar between the two groups, with no implant breakages. Clinical outcomes, as measured via mHHS and EQ-5D-5L, showed no significant differences. Despite a slightly higher implant cost, the GS group had a lower total hospital cost than the Affixus group, but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: This study highlights the efficiency of the GS hip nail in reducing the operation time compared to the Affixus hip fracture nail with comparable radiologic and clinical outcomes. Further research with long-term follow-up and larger patient studies are needed to fully assess its effectiveness in improving patient outcomes in hip fracture treatment. MDPI 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10650030/ /pubmed/37959186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216720 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kwon, Seungcheol
Lee, Minjae
Lee, Heeyeon
Hwang, Jihyo
GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures
title GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_full GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_fullStr GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_full_unstemmed GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_short GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_sort gs hip nail versus affixus hip fracture nail for the intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959186
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216720
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonseungcheol gshipnailversusaffixushipfracturenailfortheintramedullarynailingofintertrochantericfractures
AT leeminjae gshipnailversusaffixushipfracturenailfortheintramedullarynailingofintertrochantericfractures
AT leeheeyeon gshipnailversusaffixushipfracturenailfortheintramedullarynailingofintertrochantericfractures
AT hwangjihyo gshipnailversusaffixushipfracturenailfortheintramedullarynailingofintertrochantericfractures