Cargando…
Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment
Most clinical trials on the topic of extubation have involved patients outside the neurological intensive care unit. As a result, in this area clinicians are left with little evidence on which to base their decision making. Although tracheostomies are increasingly common procedures, they are not wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15469593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2864 |
_version_ | 1782123323817197568 |
---|---|
author | Mascia, Luciana Corno, Eleomore Terragni, Pier Paok Stather, David Ferguson, Niall D |
author_facet | Mascia, Luciana Corno, Eleomore Terragni, Pier Paok Stather, David Ferguson, Niall D |
author_sort | Mascia, Luciana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most clinical trials on the topic of extubation have involved patients outside the neurological intensive care unit. As a result, in this area clinicians are left with little evidence on which to base their decision making. Although tracheostomies are increasingly common procedures, they are not without complications and costs, and hence a decision to perform them should not be taken lightly. In this issue of Critical Care two groups debate the merits of tracheostomy before extubation in a patient with neurological impairment. What becomes very clear is the need for more high quality data for this common clinical problem. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1065006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-10650062005-03-16 Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment Mascia, Luciana Corno, Eleomore Terragni, Pier Paok Stather, David Ferguson, Niall D Crit Care Review Most clinical trials on the topic of extubation have involved patients outside the neurological intensive care unit. As a result, in this area clinicians are left with little evidence on which to base their decision making. Although tracheostomies are increasingly common procedures, they are not without complications and costs, and hence a decision to perform them should not be taken lightly. In this issue of Critical Care two groups debate the merits of tracheostomy before extubation in a patient with neurological impairment. What becomes very clear is the need for more high quality data for this common clinical problem. BioMed Central 2004 2004-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1065006/ /pubmed/15469593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2864 Text en Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Mascia, Luciana Corno, Eleomore Terragni, Pier Paok Stather, David Ferguson, Niall D Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment |
title | Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment |
title_full | Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment |
title_fullStr | Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment |
title_full_unstemmed | Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment |
title_short | Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment |
title_sort | pro/con clinical debate: tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15469593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mascialuciana proconclinicaldebatetracheostomyisidealforwithdrawalofmechanicalventilationinsevereneurologicalimpairment AT cornoeleomore proconclinicaldebatetracheostomyisidealforwithdrawalofmechanicalventilationinsevereneurologicalimpairment AT terragnipierpaok proconclinicaldebatetracheostomyisidealforwithdrawalofmechanicalventilationinsevereneurologicalimpairment AT statherdavid proconclinicaldebatetracheostomyisidealforwithdrawalofmechanicalventilationinsevereneurologicalimpairment AT fergusonnialld proconclinicaldebatetracheostomyisidealforwithdrawalofmechanicalventilationinsevereneurologicalimpairment |