Cargando…
A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Relapsed or refractory AML remains common and difficult to treat, with no standard of care. Therefore, improving upfront therapy to prevent relapse in younger AML patients who are candidates for aggressive chemotherapy is an imperative. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway helps regulate a vari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37958304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215129 |
_version_ | 1785135701709291520 |
---|---|
author | Palmisiano, Neil Jeschke, Grace Wilde, Lindsay Alpdogan, Onder Carabasi, Matthew Filicko-O’Hara, Joanne Grosso, Dolores Klumpp, Thomas Martinez, Ubaldo Wagner, John Carroll, Martin P. Perl, Alexander Kasner, Margaret |
author_facet | Palmisiano, Neil Jeschke, Grace Wilde, Lindsay Alpdogan, Onder Carabasi, Matthew Filicko-O’Hara, Joanne Grosso, Dolores Klumpp, Thomas Martinez, Ubaldo Wagner, John Carroll, Martin P. Perl, Alexander Kasner, Margaret |
author_sort | Palmisiano, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Relapsed or refractory AML remains common and difficult to treat, with no standard of care. Therefore, improving upfront therapy to prevent relapse in younger AML patients who are candidates for aggressive chemotherapy is an imperative. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway helps regulate a variety of cellular processes, including protein synthesis, cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Unlike many therapeutic targets valid in only a subset of patients, this pathway demonstrates broad activation across a wide variety of subtypes of AML. Sirolimus is a highly mTORC1-selective allosteric kinase inhibitor that has been extensively studied in a wide variety of malignancies, including myeloid malignancies, and is approved as antirejection prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation. We examined levels of pS6 (a marker of activation of this pathway) at baseline and after exposure to sirolimus in patient samples, and here we report on the pharmacodynamic and clinical results of our phase 1 trial. ABSTRACT: Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for younger AML patients, though many relapse. Data from our group have shown that highly phosphorylated S6 in blasts may predict response to sirolimus given with chemotherapy. We report the results of a phase I study of this combination in newly diagnosed AML and the pharmacodynamic analysis of pS6 before and after treatment. Subjects received sirolimus (12 mg on day 1, 4 mg daily, days 2–10), then idarubicin and cytarabine (days 4–10). Response was assessed at hematologic recovery or by day 42 using a modified IWG criteria. Fifty-five patients received sirolimus. Toxicity was similar to published 7 + 3 data, and 53% had high-, 27% intermediate-, and 20% favorable-risk disease. Forty-four percent of the high-risk patients entered into CR/CRp. Seventy-nine percent of the intermediate-risk subjects had a CR/CRp. All favorable-risk patients had a CR by day 42; 9/11 remained alive and in remission with a median follow-up of 660 days. Additionally, 41/55 patients had adequate samples for pharmacodynamic analysis. All patients demonstrated activation of S6 prior to therapy, in contrast to 67% seen in previous studies of relapsed AML. mTORC1 inhibition was observed in 66% of patients without enrichment among patients who achieved remission. We conclude that sirolimus and 7 + 3 is a well-tolerated and safe regimen. mTORC1 appears to be activated in almost all patients at diagnosis of AML. Inhibition of mTORC1 did not differ based on response, suggesting that AML cells may have redundant signaling pathways that regulate chemosensitivity in the presence of mTORC1 inhibition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10650097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106500972023-10-25 A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Palmisiano, Neil Jeschke, Grace Wilde, Lindsay Alpdogan, Onder Carabasi, Matthew Filicko-O’Hara, Joanne Grosso, Dolores Klumpp, Thomas Martinez, Ubaldo Wagner, John Carroll, Martin P. Perl, Alexander Kasner, Margaret Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Relapsed or refractory AML remains common and difficult to treat, with no standard of care. Therefore, improving upfront therapy to prevent relapse in younger AML patients who are candidates for aggressive chemotherapy is an imperative. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway helps regulate a variety of cellular processes, including protein synthesis, cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Unlike many therapeutic targets valid in only a subset of patients, this pathway demonstrates broad activation across a wide variety of subtypes of AML. Sirolimus is a highly mTORC1-selective allosteric kinase inhibitor that has been extensively studied in a wide variety of malignancies, including myeloid malignancies, and is approved as antirejection prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation. We examined levels of pS6 (a marker of activation of this pathway) at baseline and after exposure to sirolimus in patient samples, and here we report on the pharmacodynamic and clinical results of our phase 1 trial. ABSTRACT: Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for younger AML patients, though many relapse. Data from our group have shown that highly phosphorylated S6 in blasts may predict response to sirolimus given with chemotherapy. We report the results of a phase I study of this combination in newly diagnosed AML and the pharmacodynamic analysis of pS6 before and after treatment. Subjects received sirolimus (12 mg on day 1, 4 mg daily, days 2–10), then idarubicin and cytarabine (days 4–10). Response was assessed at hematologic recovery or by day 42 using a modified IWG criteria. Fifty-five patients received sirolimus. Toxicity was similar to published 7 + 3 data, and 53% had high-, 27% intermediate-, and 20% favorable-risk disease. Forty-four percent of the high-risk patients entered into CR/CRp. Seventy-nine percent of the intermediate-risk subjects had a CR/CRp. All favorable-risk patients had a CR by day 42; 9/11 remained alive and in remission with a median follow-up of 660 days. Additionally, 41/55 patients had adequate samples for pharmacodynamic analysis. All patients demonstrated activation of S6 prior to therapy, in contrast to 67% seen in previous studies of relapsed AML. mTORC1 inhibition was observed in 66% of patients without enrichment among patients who achieved remission. We conclude that sirolimus and 7 + 3 is a well-tolerated and safe regimen. mTORC1 appears to be activated in almost all patients at diagnosis of AML. Inhibition of mTORC1 did not differ based on response, suggesting that AML cells may have redundant signaling pathways that regulate chemosensitivity in the presence of mTORC1 inhibition. MDPI 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10650097/ /pubmed/37958304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215129 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Palmisiano, Neil Jeschke, Grace Wilde, Lindsay Alpdogan, Onder Carabasi, Matthew Filicko-O’Hara, Joanne Grosso, Dolores Klumpp, Thomas Martinez, Ubaldo Wagner, John Carroll, Martin P. Perl, Alexander Kasner, Margaret A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title | A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full | A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_fullStr | A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_short | A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with “7&3” Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_sort | phase i trial of sirolimus with “7&3” induction chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37958304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmisianoneil aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT jeschkegrace aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT wildelindsay aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT alpdoganonder aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT carabasimatthew aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT filickooharajoanne aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT grossodolores aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT klumppthomas aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT martinezubaldo aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT wagnerjohn aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT carrollmartinp aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT perlalexander aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT kasnermargaret aphaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT palmisianoneil phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT jeschkegrace phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT wildelindsay phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT alpdoganonder phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT carabasimatthew phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT filickooharajoanne phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT grossodolores phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT klumppthomas phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT martinezubaldo phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT wagnerjohn phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT carrollmartinp phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT perlalexander phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia AT kasnermargaret phaseitrialofsirolimuswith73inductionchemotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedacutemyeloidleukemia |