Cargando…

In vitro effects of omeprazole in combination with antifungal compounds against Malassezia pachydermatis

BACKGROUND: Fungal and yeast infections, including those caused by Malassezia spp., are becoming increasingly difficult to treat, likely due to the occurrence of drug resistance. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal effects of omeprazole (OME), a proton pump inhibitor, against ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Juyoung, Bae, Seulgi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1305
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Fungal and yeast infections, including those caused by Malassezia spp., are becoming increasingly difficult to treat, likely due to the occurrence of drug resistance. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal effects of omeprazole (OME), a proton pump inhibitor, against antifungal‐resistant Malassezia pachydermatis and to investigate the potential synergistic effects between OME and other antifungal compounds. METHODS: In total, 15 samples of M. pachydermatis isolated from the skin of dogs were tested. The susceptibility of M. pachydermatis to itraconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, terbinafine and OME was assessed using a modified broth microdilution (BM) method. The in vitro efficacy of OME alone and in combination with other antifungal compounds was evaluated for all isolates using the BM chequerboard method. The data obtained were analysed using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). RESULTS: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of antifungal compounds and OME against quality control strain (M. pachydermatis CBS1879) were lower than the MIC(90) values of same drugs against clinically collected strains. There was no significant difference in MIC values between drugs alone and combination. According to the analysis by the FICI method, no interaction was observed with OME and antifungal compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Most M. pachydermatis strains were resistant to azole antifungal compounds. OME exerted antifungal effects against Malassezia spp. and even showed good effects on antifungal‐resistant strains. No synergistic effects were observed between the antifungal compounds and OME.