Cargando…

Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?

Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy in the intensive care setting presents an increasingly important concept for establishing a large-bore tracheal airway with minimal surgical intervention. Over the last years, different technical solutions have been studied to assess their respective risks and be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brambrink, Ansgar
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15469590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2968
_version_ 1782123331640623104
author Brambrink, Ansgar
author_facet Brambrink, Ansgar
author_sort Brambrink, Ansgar
collection PubMed
description Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy in the intensive care setting presents an increasingly important concept for establishing a large-bore tracheal airway with minimal surgical intervention. Over the last years, different technical solutions have been studied to assess their respective risks and benefits to determine whether one method is actually superior. A recent observational study comparing two such techniques prompted this commentary, which reviews the current literature, comments on study design and suggests interesting topics for future research in this field.
format Text
id pubmed-1065037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10650372005-03-16 Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence? Brambrink, Ansgar Crit Care Commentary Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy in the intensive care setting presents an increasingly important concept for establishing a large-bore tracheal airway with minimal surgical intervention. Over the last years, different technical solutions have been studied to assess their respective risks and benefits to determine whether one method is actually superior. A recent observational study comparing two such techniques prompted this commentary, which reviews the current literature, comments on study design and suggests interesting topics for future research in this field. BioMed Central 2004 2004-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1065037/ /pubmed/15469590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2968 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Brambrink, Ansgar
Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?
title Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?
title_full Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?
title_fullStr Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?
title_short Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?
title_sort percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15469590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2968
work_keys_str_mv AT brambrinkansgar percutaneousdilatationtracheostomywhichtechniqueisthebestforthecriticallyillpatientandhowcanwegatherfurtherscientificevidence