Cargando…
Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls
The diagnosis of large vestibular schwannomas (VS) with retained useful hearing has become increasingly common. Preservation of facial nerve (FN) function has improved using intraoperative EMG monitoring, hearing preservation remains challenging, with the recent use of cochlear nerve action potentia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216906 |
_version_ | 1785135776690864128 |
---|---|
author | Hochet, Baptiste Daoudi, Hannah Lefevre, Etienne Nguyen, Yann Bernat, Isabelle Sterkers, Olivier Lahlou, Ghizlene Kalamarides, Michel |
author_facet | Hochet, Baptiste Daoudi, Hannah Lefevre, Etienne Nguyen, Yann Bernat, Isabelle Sterkers, Olivier Lahlou, Ghizlene Kalamarides, Michel |
author_sort | Hochet, Baptiste |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnosis of large vestibular schwannomas (VS) with retained useful hearing has become increasingly common. Preservation of facial nerve (FN) function has improved using intraoperative EMG monitoring, hearing preservation remains challenging, with the recent use of cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) monitoring. This prospective longitudinal series of VS with useful hearing operated on using a retrosigmoid approach included 37 patients with a mean largest extrameatal VS. diameter of 25 ± 8.7 mm (81% of Koos stage 4). CNAP was detected in 51% of patients, while auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were present in 22%. Patients were divided into two groups based on the initial intraoperative CNAP status, whether it was present or absent. FN function was preserved (grade I–II) in 95% of cases at 6 months. Serviceable hearing (class A + B) was preserved in 16% of the cases, while 27% retained hearing with intelligibility (class A–C). Hearing with intelligibility (class A–C) was preserved in 42% of cases when CNAP could be monitored in the early stages of VS resection versus 11% when it was initially absent. Changes in both the approach to the cochlear nerve and VS resection are mandatory in preserving CNAP and improve the rate of hearing preservation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10650419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106504192023-11-02 Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls Hochet, Baptiste Daoudi, Hannah Lefevre, Etienne Nguyen, Yann Bernat, Isabelle Sterkers, Olivier Lahlou, Ghizlene Kalamarides, Michel J Clin Med Article The diagnosis of large vestibular schwannomas (VS) with retained useful hearing has become increasingly common. Preservation of facial nerve (FN) function has improved using intraoperative EMG monitoring, hearing preservation remains challenging, with the recent use of cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) monitoring. This prospective longitudinal series of VS with useful hearing operated on using a retrosigmoid approach included 37 patients with a mean largest extrameatal VS. diameter of 25 ± 8.7 mm (81% of Koos stage 4). CNAP was detected in 51% of patients, while auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were present in 22%. Patients were divided into two groups based on the initial intraoperative CNAP status, whether it was present or absent. FN function was preserved (grade I–II) in 95% of cases at 6 months. Serviceable hearing (class A + B) was preserved in 16% of the cases, while 27% retained hearing with intelligibility (class A–C). Hearing with intelligibility (class A–C) was preserved in 42% of cases when CNAP could be monitored in the early stages of VS resection versus 11% when it was initially absent. Changes in both the approach to the cochlear nerve and VS resection are mandatory in preserving CNAP and improve the rate of hearing preservation. MDPI 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10650419/ /pubmed/37959371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216906 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hochet, Baptiste Daoudi, Hannah Lefevre, Etienne Nguyen, Yann Bernat, Isabelle Sterkers, Olivier Lahlou, Ghizlene Kalamarides, Michel Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls |
title | Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls |
title_full | Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls |
title_fullStr | Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls |
title_short | Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Action Potential for Hearing Preservation in Medium/Large Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Tips and Pitfalls |
title_sort | monitoring cochlear nerve action potential for hearing preservation in medium/large vestibular schwannoma surgery: tips and pitfalls |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37959371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochetbaptiste monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls AT daoudihannah monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls AT lefevreetienne monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls AT nguyenyann monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls AT bernatisabelle monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls AT sterkersolivier monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls AT lahloughizlene monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls AT kalamaridesmichel monitoringcochlearnerveactionpotentialforhearingpreservationinmediumlargevestibularschwannomasurgerytipsandpitfalls |