Cargando…

Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate

BACKGROUND: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are biopersistent, global pollutants. Although some in vitro and epidemiological studies have explored the neurotoxic potential of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), a prevalent PFAS congener, it is unknown how developmental PFOS exposure affects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paquette, Shannon E., Martin, Nathan R., Rodd, April, Manz, Katherine E., Allen, Eden, Camarillo, Manuel, Weller, Hannah I., Pennell, Kurt, Plavicki, Jessica S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Environmental Health Perspectives 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37966802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP12861
_version_ 1785147573631188992
author Paquette, Shannon E.
Martin, Nathan R.
Rodd, April
Manz, Katherine E.
Allen, Eden
Camarillo, Manuel
Weller, Hannah I.
Pennell, Kurt
Plavicki, Jessica S.
author_facet Paquette, Shannon E.
Martin, Nathan R.
Rodd, April
Manz, Katherine E.
Allen, Eden
Camarillo, Manuel
Weller, Hannah I.
Pennell, Kurt
Plavicki, Jessica S.
author_sort Paquette, Shannon E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are biopersistent, global pollutants. Although some in vitro and epidemiological studies have explored the neurotoxic potential of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), a prevalent PFAS congener, it is unknown how developmental PFOS exposure affects neuronal signaling, microglia development, and microglial–neuron communication. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the extent to which PFOS exposure disrupts brain health, neuronal activity, and microglia–neuron communication during development. In addition, although PFOS impairs humoral immunity, its impact on innate immune cells, including resident microglia, is unclear. As such, we investigated whether microglia are cellular targets of PFOS, and, if so, whether disrupted microglial development or function could contribute to or is influenced by PFOS-induced neural dysfunction. METHODS: Zebrafish were chronically exposed to either a control solution [0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)], [Formula: see text] PFOS, [Formula: see text] PFOS, [Formula: see text] PFOS, or [Formula: see text] perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). We used in vivo imaging and gene expression analysis to assess microglial populations in the developing brain and to determine shifts in the microglia state. We functionally challenged microglia state using a brain injury model and, to assess the neuronal signaling environment, performed functional neuroimaging experiments using the photoconvertible calcium indicator calcium-modulated photoactivatable ratiometric integrator (CaMPARI). These studies were paired with optogenetic manipulations of neurons and microglia, an untargeted metabolome-wide association study (MWAS), and behavioral assays. RESULTS: Developmental PFOS exposure resulted in a shift away from the homeostatic microglia state, as determined by functional and morphological differences in exposed larvae, as well as up-regulation of the microglia activation gene p2ry12. PFOS-induced effects on microglia state exacerbated microglia responses to brain injury in the absence of increased cell death or inflammation. PFOS exposure also heightened neural activity, and optogenetic silencing of neurons or microglia independently was sufficient to normalize microglial responses to injury. An untargeted MWAS of larval brains revealed PFOS-exposed larvae had neurochemical signatures of excitatory–inhibitory imbalance. Behaviorally, PFOS-exposed larvae also exhibited anxiety-like thigmotaxis. To test whether the neuronal and microglial phenotypes were specific to PFOS, we exposed embryos to PFOA, a known immunotoxic PFAS. PFOA did not alter thigmotaxis, neuronal activity, or microglial responses, further supporting a role for neuronal activity as a critical modifier of microglial function following PFOS exposure. DISCUSSION: Together, this study provides, to our knowledge, the first detailed account of the effects of PFOS exposure on neural cell types in the developing brain in vivo and adds neuronal hyperactivity as an important end point to assess when studying the impact of toxicant exposures on microglia function. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12861
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10650473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Environmental Health Perspectives
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106504732023-11-15 Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Paquette, Shannon E. Martin, Nathan R. Rodd, April Manz, Katherine E. Allen, Eden Camarillo, Manuel Weller, Hannah I. Pennell, Kurt Plavicki, Jessica S. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are biopersistent, global pollutants. Although some in vitro and epidemiological studies have explored the neurotoxic potential of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), a prevalent PFAS congener, it is unknown how developmental PFOS exposure affects neuronal signaling, microglia development, and microglial–neuron communication. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the extent to which PFOS exposure disrupts brain health, neuronal activity, and microglia–neuron communication during development. In addition, although PFOS impairs humoral immunity, its impact on innate immune cells, including resident microglia, is unclear. As such, we investigated whether microglia are cellular targets of PFOS, and, if so, whether disrupted microglial development or function could contribute to or is influenced by PFOS-induced neural dysfunction. METHODS: Zebrafish were chronically exposed to either a control solution [0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)], [Formula: see text] PFOS, [Formula: see text] PFOS, [Formula: see text] PFOS, or [Formula: see text] perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). We used in vivo imaging and gene expression analysis to assess microglial populations in the developing brain and to determine shifts in the microglia state. We functionally challenged microglia state using a brain injury model and, to assess the neuronal signaling environment, performed functional neuroimaging experiments using the photoconvertible calcium indicator calcium-modulated photoactivatable ratiometric integrator (CaMPARI). These studies were paired with optogenetic manipulations of neurons and microglia, an untargeted metabolome-wide association study (MWAS), and behavioral assays. RESULTS: Developmental PFOS exposure resulted in a shift away from the homeostatic microglia state, as determined by functional and morphological differences in exposed larvae, as well as up-regulation of the microglia activation gene p2ry12. PFOS-induced effects on microglia state exacerbated microglia responses to brain injury in the absence of increased cell death or inflammation. PFOS exposure also heightened neural activity, and optogenetic silencing of neurons or microglia independently was sufficient to normalize microglial responses to injury. An untargeted MWAS of larval brains revealed PFOS-exposed larvae had neurochemical signatures of excitatory–inhibitory imbalance. Behaviorally, PFOS-exposed larvae also exhibited anxiety-like thigmotaxis. To test whether the neuronal and microglial phenotypes were specific to PFOS, we exposed embryos to PFOA, a known immunotoxic PFAS. PFOA did not alter thigmotaxis, neuronal activity, or microglial responses, further supporting a role for neuronal activity as a critical modifier of microglial function following PFOS exposure. DISCUSSION: Together, this study provides, to our knowledge, the first detailed account of the effects of PFOS exposure on neural cell types in the developing brain in vivo and adds neuronal hyperactivity as an important end point to assess when studying the impact of toxicant exposures on microglia function. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12861 Environmental Health Perspectives 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10650473/ /pubmed/37966802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP12861 Text en https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/about-ehp/licenseEHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.
spellingShingle Research
Paquette, Shannon E.
Martin, Nathan R.
Rodd, April
Manz, Katherine E.
Allen, Eden
Camarillo, Manuel
Weller, Hannah I.
Pennell, Kurt
Plavicki, Jessica S.
Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate
title Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate
title_full Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate
title_fullStr Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate
title_short Evaluation of Neural Regulation and Microglial Responses to Brain Injury in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate
title_sort evaluation of neural regulation and microglial responses to brain injury in larval zebrafish exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37966802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP12861
work_keys_str_mv AT paquetteshannone evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT martinnathanr evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT roddapril evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT manzkatherinee evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT alleneden evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT camarillomanuel evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT wellerhannahi evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT pennellkurt evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate
AT plavickijessicas evaluationofneuralregulationandmicroglialresponsestobraininjuryinlarvalzebrafishexposedtoperfluorooctanesulfonate