Cargando…
Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?
The present article outlines the basic principles of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and how they should guide clinical practice. The evidence supporting a selection of perioperative interventions is assessed against objective criteria. Many of the perioperative interventions that have been widely ado...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2932 |
_version_ | 1782123345281548288 |
---|---|
author | Meeran, Hanif Grocott, Michael PW |
author_facet | Meeran, Hanif Grocott, Michael PW |
author_sort | Meeran, Hanif |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present article outlines the basic principles of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and how they should guide clinical practice. The evidence supporting a selection of perioperative interventions is assessed against objective criteria. Many of the perioperative interventions that have been widely adopted into clinical practice are supported by very limited evidence. Conversely a high level of evidence supports other interventions that have not been so widely adopted. This may be due to concerns about limitations in the design and conduct of some of the clinical trials. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1065089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-10650892005-03-16 Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? Meeran, Hanif Grocott, Michael PW Crit Care Review The present article outlines the basic principles of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and how they should guide clinical practice. The evidence supporting a selection of perioperative interventions is assessed against objective criteria. Many of the perioperative interventions that have been widely adopted into clinical practice are supported by very limited evidence. Conversely a high level of evidence supports other interventions that have not been so widely adopted. This may be due to concerns about limitations in the design and conduct of some of the clinical trials. BioMed Central 2005 2004-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1065089/ /pubmed/15693988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2932 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Meeran, Hanif Grocott, Michael PW Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? |
title | Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? |
title_full | Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? |
title_fullStr | Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? |
title_short | Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? |
title_sort | clinical review: evidence-based perioperative medicine? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2932 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meeranhanif clinicalreviewevidencebasedperioperativemedicine AT grocottmichaelpw clinicalreviewevidencebasedperioperativemedicine |