Cargando…

Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?

The present article outlines the basic principles of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and how they should guide clinical practice. The evidence supporting a selection of perioperative interventions is assessed against objective criteria. Many of the perioperative interventions that have been widely ado...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meeran, Hanif, Grocott, Michael PW
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2932
_version_ 1782123345281548288
author Meeran, Hanif
Grocott, Michael PW
author_facet Meeran, Hanif
Grocott, Michael PW
author_sort Meeran, Hanif
collection PubMed
description The present article outlines the basic principles of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and how they should guide clinical practice. The evidence supporting a selection of perioperative interventions is assessed against objective criteria. Many of the perioperative interventions that have been widely adopted into clinical practice are supported by very limited evidence. Conversely a high level of evidence supports other interventions that have not been so widely adopted. This may be due to concerns about limitations in the design and conduct of some of the clinical trials.
format Text
id pubmed-1065089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10650892005-03-16 Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine? Meeran, Hanif Grocott, Michael PW Crit Care Review The present article outlines the basic principles of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and how they should guide clinical practice. The evidence supporting a selection of perioperative interventions is assessed against objective criteria. Many of the perioperative interventions that have been widely adopted into clinical practice are supported by very limited evidence. Conversely a high level of evidence supports other interventions that have not been so widely adopted. This may be due to concerns about limitations in the design and conduct of some of the clinical trials. BioMed Central 2005 2004-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1065089/ /pubmed/15693988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2932 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Meeran, Hanif
Grocott, Michael PW
Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?
title Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?
title_full Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?
title_fullStr Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?
title_short Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?
title_sort clinical review: evidence-based perioperative medicine?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2932
work_keys_str_mv AT meeranhanif clinicalreviewevidencebasedperioperativemedicine
AT grocottmichaelpw clinicalreviewevidencebasedperioperativemedicine