Cargando…

Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted increasing attention as a tool for the detection and management of several medical conditions. Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells, is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, which relies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alipour, Ehsan, Pooyan, Atefe, Shomal Zadeh, Firoozeh, Darbandi, Azad Duke, Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea, Chalian, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37958267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13213372
_version_ 1785135887847260160
author Alipour, Ehsan
Pooyan, Atefe
Shomal Zadeh, Firoozeh
Darbandi, Azad Duke
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Chalian, Majid
author_facet Alipour, Ehsan
Pooyan, Atefe
Shomal Zadeh, Firoozeh
Darbandi, Azad Duke
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Chalian, Majid
author_sort Alipour, Ehsan
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted increasing attention as a tool for the detection and management of several medical conditions. Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells, is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, which relies on imaging for diagnosis and management. We aimed to review the current literature and trends in AI research of MM imaging. This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three main concepts were used in the search algorithm, including “artificial intelligence” in “radiologic examinations” of patients with “multiple myeloma”. The algorithm was used to search the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the end, we used the checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) criteria to evaluate the manuscripts. We provided the percentage of studies that were compliant with each criterion as a measure of the quality of AI research on MM. The initial search yielded 977 results. After reviewing them, 14 final studies were selected. The studies used a wide array of imaging modalities. Radiomics analysis and segmentation tasks were the most popular studies (10/14 studies). The common purposes of radiomics studies included the differentiation of MM bone lesions from other lesions and the prediction of relapse. The goal of the segmentation studies was to develop algorithms for the automatic segmentation of important structures in MM. Dice score was the most common assessment tool in segmentation studies, which ranged from 0.80 to 0.97. These studies show that imaging is a valuable data source for medical AI models and plays an even greater role in the management of MM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10650900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106509002023-11-02 Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review Alipour, Ehsan Pooyan, Atefe Shomal Zadeh, Firoozeh Darbandi, Azad Duke Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Chalian, Majid Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted increasing attention as a tool for the detection and management of several medical conditions. Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells, is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, which relies on imaging for diagnosis and management. We aimed to review the current literature and trends in AI research of MM imaging. This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three main concepts were used in the search algorithm, including “artificial intelligence” in “radiologic examinations” of patients with “multiple myeloma”. The algorithm was used to search the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the end, we used the checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) criteria to evaluate the manuscripts. We provided the percentage of studies that were compliant with each criterion as a measure of the quality of AI research on MM. The initial search yielded 977 results. After reviewing them, 14 final studies were selected. The studies used a wide array of imaging modalities. Radiomics analysis and segmentation tasks were the most popular studies (10/14 studies). The common purposes of radiomics studies included the differentiation of MM bone lesions from other lesions and the prediction of relapse. The goal of the segmentation studies was to develop algorithms for the automatic segmentation of important structures in MM. Dice score was the most common assessment tool in segmentation studies, which ranged from 0.80 to 0.97. These studies show that imaging is a valuable data source for medical AI models and plays an even greater role in the management of MM. MDPI 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10650900/ /pubmed/37958267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13213372 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Alipour, Ehsan
Pooyan, Atefe
Shomal Zadeh, Firoozeh
Darbandi, Azad Duke
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Chalian, Majid
Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review
title Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_short Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_sort current status and future of artificial intelligence in mm imaging: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37958267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13213372
work_keys_str_mv AT alipourehsan currentstatusandfutureofartificialintelligenceinmmimagingasystematicreview
AT pooyanatefe currentstatusandfutureofartificialintelligenceinmmimagingasystematicreview
AT shomalzadehfiroozeh currentstatusandfutureofartificialintelligenceinmmimagingasystematicreview
AT darbandiazadduke currentstatusandfutureofartificialintelligenceinmmimagingasystematicreview
AT bonaffinipietroandrea currentstatusandfutureofartificialintelligenceinmmimagingasystematicreview
AT chalianmajid currentstatusandfutureofartificialintelligenceinmmimagingasystematicreview