Cargando…
Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: In response to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, a convenient, rapid, and sensitive diagnostic method for detecting COVID-19 is crucial for patient control and timely treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit develop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962934 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48107 |
_version_ | 1785147574759456768 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Dandan Huang, Jing Hu, Bei Cao, Donglin Chen, Dingqiang Song, Xinqiang Chen, Jialing Zhou, Hao Cen, Aiqun Hou, Tieying |
author_facet | Zhu, Dandan Huang, Jing Hu, Bei Cao, Donglin Chen, Dingqiang Song, Xinqiang Chen, Jialing Zhou, Hao Cen, Aiqun Hou, Tieying |
author_sort | Zhu, Dandan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In response to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, a convenient, rapid, and sensitive diagnostic method for detecting COVID-19 is crucial for patient control and timely treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit developed based on a novel thermostatic amplification technique called RNase hybridization-assisted amplification. METHODS: From November 25 to December 8, 2022, patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, close contacts, and health care workers at high risk of exposure were recruited from 3 hospitals and 1 university. Respiratory specimens were collected for testing with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit and compared with reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and a commercial antigen assay kit. Samples from 1447 cases were obtained from 3 “ready-to-test” scenarios in which samples were collected on site and tested immediately, and samples from 503 cases were obtained from a “freeze-thaw test” scenario in which samples were collected, frozen, and thawed for testing. RESULTS: Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing of samples from the “ready-to-test” scenario was found to be accurate (overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.3% and 99.3%, respectively) and diagnostically useful (positive and negative likelihood ratios of 145.45 and 0.02, respectively). Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing of samples from the “freeze-thaw test” scenario was also found to be accurate (overall sensitivity and specificity of 71.2% and 98.6%, respectively) and diagnostically useful (positive and negative likelihood ratios of 51.01 and 0.67, respectively). Our findings demonstrated that the time efficiency and accuracy of the results in a “ready-to-test” scenario were better. The time required from sample preparation to the seeing the result of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test was 10 to 38 minutes, which was substantially shorter than that of RT-qPCR (at least 90 minutes). In addition, the diagnostic efficacy of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test was better than that of a commercial antigen assay kit. CONCLUSIONS: The developed RNase hybridization-assisted amplification assay provided rapid, sensitive, and convenient detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection and may be useful for enhanced detection of COVID-19 in homes, high-risk industries, and hospitals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10650960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106509602023-11-14 Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study Zhu, Dandan Huang, Jing Hu, Bei Cao, Donglin Chen, Dingqiang Song, Xinqiang Chen, Jialing Zhou, Hao Cen, Aiqun Hou, Tieying JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: In response to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, a convenient, rapid, and sensitive diagnostic method for detecting COVID-19 is crucial for patient control and timely treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit developed based on a novel thermostatic amplification technique called RNase hybridization-assisted amplification. METHODS: From November 25 to December 8, 2022, patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, close contacts, and health care workers at high risk of exposure were recruited from 3 hospitals and 1 university. Respiratory specimens were collected for testing with the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test kit and compared with reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and a commercial antigen assay kit. Samples from 1447 cases were obtained from 3 “ready-to-test” scenarios in which samples were collected on site and tested immediately, and samples from 503 cases were obtained from a “freeze-thaw test” scenario in which samples were collected, frozen, and thawed for testing. RESULTS: Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing of samples from the “ready-to-test” scenario was found to be accurate (overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.3% and 99.3%, respectively) and diagnostically useful (positive and negative likelihood ratios of 145.45 and 0.02, respectively). Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing of samples from the “freeze-thaw test” scenario was also found to be accurate (overall sensitivity and specificity of 71.2% and 98.6%, respectively) and diagnostically useful (positive and negative likelihood ratios of 51.01 and 0.67, respectively). Our findings demonstrated that the time efficiency and accuracy of the results in a “ready-to-test” scenario were better. The time required from sample preparation to the seeing the result of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test was 10 to 38 minutes, which was substantially shorter than that of RT-qPCR (at least 90 minutes). In addition, the diagnostic efficacy of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 rapid test was better than that of a commercial antigen assay kit. CONCLUSIONS: The developed RNase hybridization-assisted amplification assay provided rapid, sensitive, and convenient detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection and may be useful for enhanced detection of COVID-19 in homes, high-risk industries, and hospitals. JMIR Publications 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10650960/ /pubmed/37962934 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48107 Text en ©Dandan Zhu, Jing Huang, Bei Hu, Donglin Cao, Dingqiang Chen, Xinqiang Song, Jialing Chen, Hao Zhou, Aiqun Cen, Tieying Hou. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 14.11.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Zhu, Dandan Huang, Jing Hu, Bei Cao, Donglin Chen, Dingqiang Song, Xinqiang Chen, Jialing Zhou, Hao Cen, Aiqun Hou, Tieying Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study |
title | Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Trial of the Pluslife SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Rapid Test Kit: Prospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | trial of the pluslife sars-cov-2 nucleic acid rapid test kit: prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962934 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhudandan trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT huangjing trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT hubei trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT caodonglin trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT chendingqiang trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT songxinqiang trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT chenjialing trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT zhouhao trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT cenaiqun trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy AT houtieying trialofthepluslifesarscov2nucleicacidrapidtestkitprospectivecohortstudy |