Cargando…
OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort
OptiBreech collaborative care is a multi-disciplinary care pathway for breech presentation at term, with continuity from a breech specialist midwife, including where chosen, for vaginal breech birth (VBB). Pilot randomised trial using unblinded 1:1 parallel group allocation to OptiBreech versus stan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294139 |
_version_ | 1785147580752068608 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Shawn Spillane, Emma Stringer, Kate Trepte, Lauren Davies, Siân M. Bresson, Jacana Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew |
author_facet | Walker, Shawn Spillane, Emma Stringer, Kate Trepte, Lauren Davies, Siân M. Bresson, Jacana Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew |
author_sort | Walker, Shawn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OptiBreech collaborative care is a multi-disciplinary care pathway for breech presentation at term, with continuity from a breech specialist midwife, including where chosen, for vaginal breech birth (VBB). Pilot randomised trial using unblinded 1:1 parallel group allocation to OptiBreech versus standard care, within a cohort. Participants were women with a breech-presenting fetus > 33 weeks, at four sites in England, January–June 2022. A two-stage consent process was used. Participants consented to undergo random selection to be offered a ‘new care process’, with a choice to accept it, or not. Primary objectives were to identify recruitment, acceptance, and attrition rates. Randomisation procedures and potential primary outcomes for a substantive study were also feasibility-tested. 68 women were randomised between January–June 2022. The consent process was acceptable to participants, but randomisation was unacceptable to women who specifically sought OptiBreech care. Two women withdrew due to concerns about sharing personal information. More women planned a VBB when randomised to OptiBreech Care (23.5% vs 0, p = .002, 95% CI = 9.3%,37.8%). Women randomised to OptiBreech care had: lower rates of cephalic presentation at birth (38.2% vs 54.5%), higher rates of vaginal birth (32.4% vs 24.2%), lower rates of in-labour caesarean birth (20.6% vs 36.4%), lower rates of neonatal intensive care (5.9% vs 9.1%), and lower rates of severe neonatal morbidity (2.9% vs 9.1%). Randomisation was stopped on the advice of the steering committee before the planned sample of 104, as lack of access to VBB within standard care prohibited comparison of outcomes. Demand for VBB is sufficient for a cohort study, but comparison of outcomes by 1:1 randomisation is not feasible. OptiBreech care would be best evaluated using stepped wedge cluster randomisation. Funded by the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR300582). Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN 14521381. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10650999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106509992023-11-15 OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort Walker, Shawn Spillane, Emma Stringer, Kate Trepte, Lauren Davies, Siân M. Bresson, Jacana Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew PLoS One Research Article OptiBreech collaborative care is a multi-disciplinary care pathway for breech presentation at term, with continuity from a breech specialist midwife, including where chosen, for vaginal breech birth (VBB). Pilot randomised trial using unblinded 1:1 parallel group allocation to OptiBreech versus standard care, within a cohort. Participants were women with a breech-presenting fetus > 33 weeks, at four sites in England, January–June 2022. A two-stage consent process was used. Participants consented to undergo random selection to be offered a ‘new care process’, with a choice to accept it, or not. Primary objectives were to identify recruitment, acceptance, and attrition rates. Randomisation procedures and potential primary outcomes for a substantive study were also feasibility-tested. 68 women were randomised between January–June 2022. The consent process was acceptable to participants, but randomisation was unacceptable to women who specifically sought OptiBreech care. Two women withdrew due to concerns about sharing personal information. More women planned a VBB when randomised to OptiBreech Care (23.5% vs 0, p = .002, 95% CI = 9.3%,37.8%). Women randomised to OptiBreech care had: lower rates of cephalic presentation at birth (38.2% vs 54.5%), higher rates of vaginal birth (32.4% vs 24.2%), lower rates of in-labour caesarean birth (20.6% vs 36.4%), lower rates of neonatal intensive care (5.9% vs 9.1%), and lower rates of severe neonatal morbidity (2.9% vs 9.1%). Randomisation was stopped on the advice of the steering committee before the planned sample of 104, as lack of access to VBB within standard care prohibited comparison of outcomes. Demand for VBB is sufficient for a cohort study, but comparison of outcomes by 1:1 randomisation is not feasible. OptiBreech care would be best evaluated using stepped wedge cluster randomisation. Funded by the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR300582). Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN 14521381. Public Library of Science 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10650999/ /pubmed/37967120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294139 Text en © 2023 Walker et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Walker, Shawn Spillane, Emma Stringer, Kate Trepte, Lauren Davies, Siân M. Bresson, Jacana Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort |
title | OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort |
title_full | OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort |
title_fullStr | OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort |
title_short | OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort |
title_sort | optibreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: a pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkershawn optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT spillaneemma optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT stringerkate optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT treptelauren optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT daviessianm optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT bressonjacana optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT sandalljane optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT shennanandrew optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort AT optibreechcollaborativecareversusstandardcareforwomenwithabreechpresentingfetusattermapilotparallelgrouprandomisedtrialtoevaluatethefeasibilityofarandomisedtrialnestedwithinacohort |